Is There a Golden Parachute in Sannikov’s Principal–Agent Problem?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2022.0305

References

  • [1] Adrian T, Westerfield M (2009) Disagreement and learning in a dynamic contracting model. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(10):3873–3906.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [2] Alvarez O, Lasry JM, Lions PL (1997) Convex viscosity solutions and state constraints. J. Math. Pures Appl. 76(3):265–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [3] Biais B, Mariotti T, Rochet JC (2013) Dynamic financial contracting. Acemoglu D, Arellano M, Dekel E, eds. Adv. Econom. Econometrics 10th World Congress Econometric Soc. Vol. 1 Econom. Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 125–171.Google Scholar
  • [4] Biais B, Mariotti T, Plantin G, Rochet JC (2007) Dynamic security design: Convergence to continuous time and asset pricing implications. Rev. Econom. Stud. 74(2):345–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [5] Biais B, Mariotti T, Rochet JC, Villeneuve S (2010) Large risks, limited liability, and dynamic moral hazard. Econometrica 78(1):73–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [6] Bouchard B, Touzi N (2000) Explicit solution to the multivariate super-replication problem under transaction costs. Ann. Appl. Probab. 10(3):685–708.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [7] Broadie M, Cvitanić J, Soner H (1998) Optimal replication of contingent claims under portfolio constraints. Rev. Financial Stud. 11(1):59–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [8] Capponi A, Frei C (2015) Dynamic contracting: Accidents lead to nonlinear contracts. SIAM J. Financial Math. 6(1):959–983.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [9] Chassagneux JF, Élie R, Kharroubi I (2015) When terminal facelift enforces Delta constraints. Finance Stochastics 19(2):329–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [10] Cheridito P, Soner H, Touzi N (2005) The multi-dimensional super-replication problem under gamma constraints. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare Anal. Non Lineaire 22(5):633–666.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [11] Choi S (2014) On Sannikov’s continuous-time principal-agent problem. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  • [12] Crandall M, Ishii H, Lions PL (1992) User’s guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 27(1):1–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [13] Cvitanić J, Zhang J (2012) Contract Theory in Continuous-Time Models (Springer, Cham, Switzerland).Google Scholar
  • [14] Cvitanić J, Possamaï D, Touzi N (2017) Moral hazard in dynamic risk management. Management Sci. 63(10):3328–3346.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [15] Cvitanić J, Possamaï D, Touzi N (2018) Dynamic programming approach to principal-agent problems. Finance Stochastics 22(1):1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [16] Cvitanić J, Wan X, Zhang J (2006) Optimal contracts in continuous-time models. Internat. J. Stochastic Anal. 2006:095203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [17] Cvitanić J, Wan X, Zhang J (2008) Principal-agent problems with exit options. B. E. J. Theoret. Econom. 8(1):1474.Google Scholar
  • [18] Cvitanić J, Wan X, Zhang J (2009) Optimal compensation with hidden action and lump-sum payment in a continuous-time model. Appl. Math. Optim. 59(1):99–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [19] Décamps JP, Villeneuve S (2019) A two-dimensional control problem arising from dynamic contracting theory. Finance Stochastics 23(1):1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [20] DeMarzo P, Sannikov Y (2006) Optimal security design and dynamic capital structure in a continuous-time agency model. J. Finance 61(6):2681–2724.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [21] DeMarzo P, Fishman M, He Z, Wang N (2012) Dynamic agency and the q theory of investment. J. Finance 67(6):2295–2340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [22] Fong K (2009) Evaluating skilled experts: Optimal scoring rules for surgeons. Technical report, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • [23] Guasoni P, Rásonyi M, Schachermayer W (2008) Consistent price systems and facelifting pricing under transaction costs. Ann. Appl. Probab. 18(2):491–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [24] Hajjej I, Hillairet C, Mnif M (2022) Optimal stopping contract for public private partnerships under moral hazard. Frontiers Math. Finance 1(4):539–573.Google Scholar
  • [25] Hajjej I, Hillairet C, Mnif M, Pontier M (2017) Optimal contract with moral hazard for public private partnerships. Stochastics 89(6–7):1015–1038.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [26] He Z (2009) Optimal executive compensation when firm size follows geometric Brownian motion. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(2):859–892.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [27] Hellwig M (2007) The role of boundary solutions in principal-agent problems of the Holmström–Milgrom type. J. Econom. Theory 136(1):446–475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [28] Hellwig M, Schmidt K (2002) Discrete-time approximations of the Holmström–Milgrom Brownian-motion model of intertemporal incentive provision. Econometrica 70(6):2225–2264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [29] Hoffmann F, Pfeil S (2010) Reward for luck in a dynamic agency model. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(9):3329–3345.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [30] Holmström B, Milgrom P (1987) Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica 55(2):303–328.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [31] Imbert C (2006) Convexity of solutions and C1,1 estimates for fully nonlinear elliptic equations. J. Math. Pures Appl. 85(6):791–807.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [32] Ju N, Wan X (2012) Optimal compensation and pay-performance sensitivity in a continuous-time principal-agent model. Management Sci. 58(3):641–657.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [33] Karatzas I, Shreve S (1998) Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus, 2nd ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 113 (Springer-Verlag, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [34] Keiber K (2003) Overconfidence in the continuous-time principal-agent problem. Technical report, WHU Otto Beisheim Graduate School of Management, Düsseldorf, Germany.Google Scholar
  • [35] Krylov N (1980) Controlled Diffusion Processes, Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability, vol. 14 (Springer-Verlag, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [36] Larsen K, Soner H, Žitković G (2016) Facelifting in utility maximization. Finance Stochastics 20(1):99–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [37] Leung R (2014) Continuous-time principal-agent problem with drift and stochastic volatility control: With applications to delegated portfolio management. Technical report, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  • [38] Lin Y, Ren Z, Touzi N, Yang J (2020) Second order backward SDE with random terminal time. Electronic J. Probab. 25(99):1–43.Google Scholar
  • [39] Lin Y, Ren Z, Touzi N, Yang J (2022) Random horizon principal-agent problem. SIAM J. Control Optim. 60(1):355–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [40] Lions PL (1983) Optimal control of diffustion processes and Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations. III. Regularity of the optimal cost function. Brezis H, Lions JL, eds. Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Their Applications, Collège de France Seminar Volume V, Research Notes in Mathematics, vol. 93 (Taylor & Francis, Milton Park, UK), 95–205.Google Scholar
  • [41] Mirrlees J, Raimondo R (2013) Strategies in the principal-agent model. Econom. Theory 53(3):605–656.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [42] Müller H (1998) The first-best sharing rule in the continuous-time principal-agent problem with exponential utility. J. Econom. Theory 79(2):276–280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [43] Müller H (2000) Asymptotic efficiency in dynamic principal-agent problems. J. Econom. Theory 91(2):292–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [44] Myerson R (2008) Leadership, trust, and power: Dynamic moral hazard in high office. Technical report, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  • [45] Ou-Yang H (2003) Optimal contracts in a continuous-time delegated portfolio management problem. Rev. Financial Stud. 16(1):173–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [46] Pagès H (2013) Bank monitoring incentives and optimal ABS. J. Financial Intermediation 22(1):30–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [47] Pagès H, Possamaï D (2014) A mathematical treatment of bank monitoring incentives. Finance Stochastics 18(1):39–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [48] Papapantoleon A, Possamaï D, Saplaouras A (2018) Existence and uniqueness for BSDEs with jumps: The whole nine yards. Electronic J. Probab. 23(121):1–68.Google Scholar
  • [49] Piskorski T, Tchistyi A (2010) Optimal mortgage design. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(8):3098–3140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [50] Piskorski T, Westerfield M (2016) Optimal dynamic contracts with moral hazard and costly monitoring. J. Econom. Theory 166:242–281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [51] Possamaï D, Rodrigues M (2024) Reflections on BSDEs. Electronic J. Probab. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • [52] Rogerson W (1985) The first-order approach to principal-agent problems. Econometrica 53(6):1357–1368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [53] Sannikov Y (2007) Agency problems, screening and increasing credit lines. Technical report, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  • [54] Sannikov Y (2008) A continuous-time version of the principal-agent problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 75(3):957–984.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [55] Sannikov Y (2013) Contracts: The theory of dynamic principal-agent relationships and the continuous-time approach. Acemoglu D, Arellano M, Dekel E, eds. Adv. Econom. Econometrics 10th World Congress Econometric Soc. Vol. 1 Econom. Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 89–124.Google Scholar
  • [56] Schättler H, Sung J (1993) The first-order approach to the continuous-time principal-agent problem with exponential utility. J. Econom. Theory 61(2):331–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [57] Schmock U, Shreve S, Wystup U (2002) Valuation of exotic options under shortselling constraints. Finance Stochastics 6(2):143–172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [58] Schroder M, Sinha S, Levental S (2010) The continuous-time principal-agent problem with moral hazard and recursive preferences. Technical report, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
  • [59] Soner H, Touzi N (2000) Superreplication under gamma constraints. SIAM J. Control Optim. 39(1):73–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [60] Soner H, Touzi N (2002) Dynamic programming for stochastic target problems and geometric flows. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 4(3):201–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [61] Soner H, Touzi N (2003) The problem of super-replication under constraints. Bank P, Baudoin E, Föllmer H, Rogers L, Soner H, Touzi N, eds. Paris–Princeton Lectures on Mathematical Finance 2002, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1814 (Springer, New York), 133–172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [62] Soner H, Touzi N (2007) Hedging under gamma constraints by optimal stopping and facelifting. Math. Finance 17(1):59–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [63] Spear S, Srivastava S (1987) On repeated moral hazard with discounting. Rev. Econom. Stud. 54(4):599–617.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [64] Stroock D, Varadhan S (1997) Multidimensional Diffusion Processes, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 233 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).Google Scholar
  • [65] Strulovici B, Szydlowski M (2015) On the smoothness of value functions and the existence of optimal strategies in diffusion models. J. Econom. Theory 159:1016–1055.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [66] Sung J (1995) Linearity with project selection and controllable diffusion rate in continuous-time principal-agent problems. RAND J. Econom. 26(4):720–743.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [67] Sung J (1997) Corporate insurance and managerial incentives. J. Econom. Theory 74(2):297–332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [68] Touzi N (2013) Optimal Stochastic Control, Stochastic Target Problems, and Backward SDE, Fields Institute Monographs, vol. 29 (Springer-Verlag, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [69] Van Long N, Sorger G (2010) A dynamic principal-agent problem as a feedback Stackelberg differential game. Central Eur. J. Oper. Res. 18(4):491–509.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [70] Westerfield M (2006) Optimal dynamic contracts with hidden actions in continuous time. Technical report, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  • [71] Williams N (2008) On dynamic principal-agent problems in continuous time. Technical report, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  • [72] Williams N (2011) Persistent private information. Econometrica 79(4):1233–1275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [73] Williams N (2015) A solvable continuous time dynamic principal-agent model. J. Econom. Theory 159(Part B):989–1015.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [74] Zhang Y (2009) Dynamic contracting with persistent shocks. J. Econom. Theory 144(2):635–675.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [75] Zhou Y (2006) Principal-agent analysis in continuous-time. Technical report, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  • [76] Zhu J (2011) Sticky incentives and dynamic agency. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.