Nonasymptotic Convergence Rates for the Plug-in Estimation of Risk Measures

References

• [1] Acciaio B, Svindland G (2013) Are law-invariant risk functions concave on distributions? Dependence Model. 1(3):54–64.Google Scholar
• [2] Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9(3):203–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [3] Bartl D, Mendelson S (2022) On Monte-Carlo methods in convex stochastic optimization. Ann. Appl. Probab. 32(4):3146–3198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [4] Bartl D, Drapeau S, Tangpi L (2020) Computational aspects of robust optimized certainty equivalents and option pricing. Math. Finance 30(1):287–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [5] Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2013) Fundamental review of the trading book: A revised market risk framework. Technical report, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• [6] Belomestny D, Krätschmer V (2012) Central limit theorems for law-invariant coherent risk measures. J. Appl. Probab. 49(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [7] Ben-Tal A, Taboulle M (1986) Expected utility, penalty functions and duality in stochastic nonlinear programming. Management Sci. 32(11):1445–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• [8] Ben-Tal A, Taboulle M (2007) An old-new concept of convex risk measures: The optimized certainty equivalent. Math. Finance 17(3):449–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [9] Bertsimas D, Gupta V, Kallus N (2017) Robust sample average approximation. Math. Programming 171:217–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [10] Beutner E, Zähle H (2010) A modified functional delta method and its application to the estimation of risk functionals. J. Multivariate Anal. 101(10):2452–2463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [11] Chen SX (2008) Nonparametric estimation of expected shortfall. J. Financial Econom. 6(1):87–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [12] Chu J, Tangpi L (2021) Non-asymptotic estimation of risk measures using stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics. Preprint, submitted November 24, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.12248.Google Scholar
• [13] Claus M, Krätschmer V, Schultz R (2017) Weak continuity of risk functionals with applications to stochastic programming. SIAM J. Optim. 27(1):91–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [14] Cont R, Deguest R, Scandolo G (2010) Robustness and sensitivity analysis of risk measurement procedures. Quant. Finance 10(6):593–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [15] Eckstein S, Kupper M, Pohl M (2020) Robust risk aggregation with neural networks. Math. Finance 30(4):1229–1272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [16] Embrechts P, Hofert M (2014) Statistics and quantitative risk management for banking and insurance. Annual Rev. Statist. Appl. 1:493–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [17] Esfahani PM, Kuhn D (2018) Data-driven distributionally robust optimization using the Wassertein metric: Performance guarantees and tractable reformulations. Math. Programming 171:115–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [18] Föllmer H, Schied A (2002) Convex measures of risk and trading constraint. Finance Stochastics 6(4)429–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [19] Föllmer H, Schied A (2004) Stochastic Finance: An Introduction in Discrete Time, 2nd ed., de Gruyter Studies in Mathematics (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• [20] Fournier N, Guillin A (2015) On the rate of convergence in Wasserstein distance of the empirical measure. Probab. Theory Related Fields 162:707–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [21] Furman E, Zitikis R (2008) Weighted risk capital allocations. Insurance Math. Econom. 43(2):263–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [22] Gao N, Leung D, Munari C, Xanthos F (2018) Fatou property, representation, and extensions of law-invariant risk measures on general Orlicz spaces. Finance Stochastics 22:395–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [23] Glasserman P (2004) Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering (Springer Science and Business Media, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• [24] Glasserman P, Heidelberger P, Shahabuddin P (2000) Variance reduction techniques for estimating value-at-risk. Management Sci. 46(10):1349–1364.Link, Google Scholar
• [25] Guigues V, Krätschmer V, Shapiro A (2018) A central limit theorem and hypothesis testing for risk-averse stochastic programs. SIAM J. Optim. 28(2):1337–1366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [26] Holzmann H, Zwingmann T (2020) Weak convergence of quantile and expectile processes under general assumptions. Bernoulli 26(1):323–351.Google Scholar
• [27] Hong LJ (2009) Estimating quantile sensitivities. Oper. Res. 57(1):118–130.Link, Google Scholar
• [28] Hong LJ, Hu Z, Liu G (2014) Monte Carlo methods for value-at-risk and conditional value-at-risk: A review. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simulation 24(4):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [29] Jin X, Fu MC, Xiong X (2003) Probabilistic error bounds for simulation quantile estimators. Management Sci. 14(2):230–246.Link, Google Scholar
• [30] Jorion P (2006) Value at Risk, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• [31] Jouini E, Schachermayer W, Touzi N (2006) Law invariant risk measures have the Fatou property. Kusuoka S, Yamazaki A, eds. Advances in Mathematical Economics, vol. 9 (Springer, Japan), 49–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [32] Kim S, Pasupathy R, Henderson SG (2015) A guide to sample average approximation. Fu M, ed. Handbook of Simulation Optimization, vol. 216 (Springer, New York) 207–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [33] Kleywegt AJ, Shapiro A, and Homem de Mello T (2001) The sample average approximation method for stochastic discrete optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 12(2):479–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [34] Krätschmer V (2021) First order asymptotics of the sample average approximation method to solve risk averse stochastic programs. Preprint, submitted July 29, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.13863.Google Scholar
• [35] Krätschmer V, Zähle H (2017) Statistical inference for expectile-based risk measures. Scandinavian J. Statist. 44(2):425–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [36] Krätschmer V, Schied A, Zähle H (2012) Qualitative and infinitesimal robustness of tail-dependent statistical functionals. J. Multivariate Anal. 103(1):35–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [37] Krätschmer V, Schied A, Zähle H (2014) Comparative and quantitative robustness for law-invariant risk measures. Finance Stochastics 18:271–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [38] Krätschmer V, Schied A, Zähle H (2015) Quasi-Hadamard differentiability of general riskk functionals and its application. Statist. Risk Model. 32(1):25–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [39] Krätschmer V, Schied A, Zähle H (2017) Domains of weak continuity of statistical functions with a view toward robust statistics. J. Multivariate Anal. 158(4):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [40] Kusuoka S (2001) On law invariant coherent risk measures. Advances in Mathematical Economics (Springer), 83–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [41] Markowitz HM (1952) Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7(1):77–91.Google Scholar
• [42] McNeil AJ, Frey R, Embrechts P (2005) Quantitative Risk Management (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
• [43] Nonnenmacher DJF, Zagst R (1995) A new form of Jensen’s inequality and its application to statistical experiments. ANZIAM J. 36(4):389–398.Google Scholar
• [44] Obłój J, Wiesel J (2021) Statistical estimation of superhedging prices. Ann. Statist. 49(1):508–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [45] Pal S (2006) On capital requirements and optimal strategies to achieve acceptability. Unpublished PhD thesis, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• [46] Pal S (2007) Computing strategies for achieving acceptability: A Monte Carlo approach. Stochastic Processes Appl. 117(11):1587–1605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [47] Pitera M, Schmidt T (2018) Unbiased estimation of risk. J. Banking Finance 91:133–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [48] Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2(3):21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [49] Shapiro A, Dentcheva D, Ruszczyński A (2014) Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics).Crossref, Google Scholar
• [50] van der Vaart AW, Wellner JA (1996) Weak convergence. Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes with Applications to Statistics (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• [51] Weber S (2007) Distribution-invariant risk measures, entropy, and large deviations. J. Appl. Probab. 44(1):16–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [52] Young VR (2004) Premium principles. Teugels JL, Sundt B, eds. Encyclopedia of Acturial Science (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar