Convexification of Bilinear Terms over Network Polytopes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2023.0001

References

  • [1] Al-Khayyal FA, Falk JE (1983) Jointly constrained biconvex programming. Math. Oper. Res. 8:273–286.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [2] Balas E (1998) Disjunctive programming: Properties of the convex hull of the feasible points. Discrete Appl. Math. 89:3–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [3] Beale EML, Forrest JJH (1976) Global optimization using special ordered sets. Math. Programming 10:52–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [4] Ben-Ayed O, Blair CE (1990) Computational difficulties of bilevel linear programming. Oper. Res. 38:556–560.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [5] Boland N, Dey SS, Kalinowski T, Molinaro M, Rigterink F (2017) Bounding the gap between the McCormick relaxation and the convex hull for bilinear functions. Math. Programming 162:523–532.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [6] Bonami P, Günlük O, Linderoth J (2018) Globally solving nonconvex quadratic programming problems with box constraints via integer programming methods. Math. Programming Comput. 10(3):333–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [7] Buchheim C, Crama Y, Rodríguez-Heck E (2019) Berge-acyclic multilinear 0-1 optimization problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 273(1):102–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [8] Chiou SW (2005) Bilevel programming for the continuous transport network design problem. Transportation Res. Part B Methodol. 39(4):361–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [9] Davarnia D (2016) Convexification techniques for bilinear and complementarity constraints with application to network interdiction. PhD thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.Google Scholar
  • [10] Davarnia D (2021) Strong relaxations for continuous nonlinear programs based on decision diagrams. Oper. Res. Lett. 49(2):239–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [11] Davarnia D, Van Hoeve WJ (2020) Outer approximation for integer nonlinear programs via decision diagrams. Math. Programming 187:111–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [12] Davarnia D, Richard JPP, Tawarmalani M (2017) Simultaneous convexification of bilinear functions over polytopes with application to network interdiction. SIAM J. Optim. 27:1801–1833.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [13] Del Pia A, Di Gregorio S (2021) Chvátal rank in binary polynomial optimization. INFORMS J. Optim. 3(4):315–349.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [14] Del Pia A, Khajavirad A (2018) The multilinear polytope for acyclic hypergraphs. SIAM J. Optim. 28(2):1049–1076.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [15] Del Pia A, Khajavirad A (2021) The running intersection relaxation of the multilinear polytope. Math. Oper. Res. 46:1008–1037.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [16] Del Pia A, Walter M (2022) Simple odd β-cycle inequalities for binary polynomial optimization. Aardal K, Sanità L, eds. Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 181–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [17] Fampa M, Lee J (2021) Convexification of bilinear forms through non-symmetric lifting. J. Global Optim. 80:287–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [18] Ficker A, Spieksma F, Woeginger G (2021) The transportation problem with conflicts. Ann. Oper. Res. 298:207–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [19] Gupte A, Ahmed S, Cheon MS, Dey S (2013) Solving mixed integer bilinear problems using MILP formulations. SIAM J. Optim. 23:721–744.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [20] Gupte A, Kalinowski T, Rigterink F, Waterer H (2020) Extended formulations for convex hulls of some bilinear functions. Discrete Optim. 36:100569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [21] Khajavirad A (2023) On the strength of recursive McCormick relaxations for binary polynomial optimization. Oper. Res. Lett. 51(2):146–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [22] Locatelli M, Schoen F (2014) On convex envelopes for bivariate functions over polytopes. Math. Programming 144:65–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [23] Luedtke J, Namazifar M, Linderoth J (2012) Some results on the strength of relaxations of multilinear functions. Math. Programming 136:325–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [24] McCormick GP (1976) Computability of global solutions to factorable nonconvex programs: Part I. Convex underestimating problems. Math. Programming 10:145–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [25] Muller B, Serrano F, Gleixner A (2020) Using two-dimensional projections for stronger separation and propagation of bilinear terms. SIAM J. Optim. 30(2):1339–1365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [26] Rebennack S, Nahapetyan A, Pardalos P (2009) Bilinear modeling solution approach for fixed charge network flow problems. Optim. Lett. 3:347–355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [27] Salemi H, Davarnia D (2022) On the structure of decision diagram-representable mixed integer programs with application to unit commitment. Oper. Res. 71:1943–1959.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [28] Salemi H, Davarnia D (2023) Solving unsplittable network flow problems with decision diagrams. Transportation Sci. 57(4):937–953.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [29] Sherali HD, Adams WP (1990) A hierarchy of relaxations between the continuous and convex hull representations for zero-one programming problems. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 3:411–430.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [30] Sherali HD, Alameddine A (1992) A new reformulation-linearization technique for bilinear programming problems. J. Global Optim. 2:379–410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [31] Sherali HD, Adams WP, Driscoll PJ (1998) Exploiting special structures in constructing a hierarchy of relaxations for 0-1 mixed integer problems. Oper. Res. 46:396–405.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [32] Smith JC, Lim C (2008) Algorithms for network interdiction and fortification games. Chinchuluun A, Pardalos PM, Migdalas A, Pitsoulis L, eds. Pareto Optimality, Game Theory And Equilibria, vol. 17 (Springer Optimization and Its Applications, New York), 609–644.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [33] Tawarmalani M, Richard JPP, Xiong C (2012) Explicit convex and concave envelopes through polyhedral subdivisions. Math. Programming 138:531–577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [34] Vancroonenburg W, Della Croce F, Goossens D, Spieksma FC (2014) The red-blue transportation problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 237(3):814–823.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.