Information Design and Sharing in Supply Chains
References
- [1] (2001) The effect of collaborative forecasting on supply chain performance. Management Sci. 47(10):1326–1343.Link, Google Scholar
- [2] (2002) Gaining benefits from joint forecasting and replenishment processes: The case of auto-correlated demand. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 4(1):55–74.Link, Google Scholar
- [3] (2003) A time-series framework for supply chain inventory management. Oper. Res. 51(2):210–227.Link, Google Scholar
- [4] (2007) On the benefits of collaborative forecasting partnerships between retailers and manufacturers. Management Sci. 53(5):777–794.Link, Google Scholar
- [5] (2004) Coordinating supply chains by controlling upstream variability propagation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 6(2):163–183.Link, Google Scholar
- [6] (1949) On two problems concerning linear transformations in Hilbert space. Acta Mathematica 81:239–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [7] (1996) Exploiting timely demand information to reduce inventories. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 92(2):239–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [8] (2007) An integrated production and inventory model to dampen upstream demand variability in the supply chain. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178(1):121–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [9] (2012) Information transmission and the bullwhip effect: An empirical investigation. Management Sci. 58(5):860–875.Link, Google Scholar
- [10] (2015) Production smoothing and the bullwhip effect. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(2):208–220.Link, Google Scholar
- [11] (2006) Time Series: Theory and Methods (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
- [12] (2000) Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information. Management Sci. 46(8):1032–1048.Link, Google Scholar
- [13] (2019) Order smoothing and information sharing under endogenous inventory cost parameters. Preprint, submitted March 4, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3333371.Google Scholar
- [14] (2022) Performance bound for myopic order-up-to inventory policies under stationary demand processes. Oper. Res. Lett. 50(5):588–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [15] (1998) Echelon reorder points, installation reorder points, and the value of centralized demand information. Management Sci. 44(12):221–234.Link, Google Scholar
- [16] (2003) Information sharing and supply chain coordination. Graves SC, de Kok AG, eds. Supply Chain Management: Design, Coordination and Operations, Handbooks in OR & MS, vol. 11 (Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam), 341–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [17] (2009) Information sharing and order variability control under a generalized demand model. Management Sci. 55(5):781–797.Link, Google Scholar
- [18] (2017) Measuring the bullwhip effect: Discrepancy and alignment between information and material flows. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(1):36–51.Link, Google Scholar
- [19] (2015) Information sharing in supply chains: An empirical and theoretical valuation. Management Sci. 61(11):2803–2824.Link, Google Scholar
- [20] (2014) Beyond information sharing: An empirical analysis of vendor managed inventory. Production Oper. Management 23(5):817–828.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [21] (2005) Information sharing in a supply chain under ARMA demand. Management Sci. 51(6):961–969.Link, Google Scholar
- [22] (1999) Value of information in capacitated supply chains. Management Sci. 45(1):16–24.Link, Google Scholar
- [23] (2014) Forecasting and information sharing in supply chains under ARMA demand. IIE Trans. 46(1):35–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [24] (1998) A dynamic model for requirements planning with application to supply chain optimization. Oper. Res. 46(3):35–49.Link, Google Scholar
- [25] (2002) Supply chain partnership between P&G and Wal-Mart. Shaw MJ, ed. E-Business Management, Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol. 1 (Springer, Boston), 155–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [26] (1957) Statistical Analysis of Stationary Time Series (AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, RI).Crossref, Google Scholar
- [27] (2017) Handbook of Information Exchange in Supply Chain Management (Springer International Publishing, Basel, Switzerland).Crossref, Google Scholar
- [28] (2015) Analyzing variability, cost, and responsiveness of base-stock inventory policies with linear control theory. IIE Trans. 47(8):865–879.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [29] (2007) Analyzing the effect of the inventory policy on order and inventory variability with linear control theory. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 176(3):1620–1642.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [30] (2006) On variance amplification in a three-echelon supply chain with minimum mean square error forecasting. Omega 34(4):344–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [31] (1899) Sur un nouvel et important théorème de la théorie des fonctions. Acta Mathematica 22:359–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [32] (1975) Optimality of myopic inventory policies for certain dependent demand processes. Management Sci. 21(11):1303–1307.Link, Google Scholar
- [33] (2014) Assessing the value of demand sharing in supply chains. Naval Res. Logist. 61(7):515–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [34] (2022) Partial-information sharing in supply chains with ARMA demand. Working paper, Yeshiva University, New York.Google Scholar
- [35] (2004) Manufacturer benefits from information integration with retail customers. Management Sci. 50(4):431–444.Link, Google Scholar
- [36] Kurt Salomon Associates (1993) Efficient consumer response: Enhancing consumer value in the grocery industry. Technical report, The Joint Industry Project on Efficient Consumer Response, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- [37] (2000) Information sharing in a supply chain. Internat. J. Tech. Management 20(3–4):373–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [38] (1997) The bullwhip effect in supply chains. Sloan Management Rev. 38(3):93–102.Google Scholar
- [39] (2004) Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. 50(12):1875–1886.Link, Google Scholar
- [40] (2000) The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Sci. 46(5):626–643.Link, Google Scholar
- [41] (2007) An Introduction to Operators on the Hardy-Hilbert Space (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
- [42] (2004) How a base stock policy using “stale” forecasts provides supply chain benefits. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 6(2):149–162.Link, Google Scholar
- [43] (2019) Hardy Spaces (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- [44] (2021) The bullwhip effect in supply networks. Management Sci. 67(10):6153–6173.Link, Google Scholar
- [45] (1981) Spectral Analysis and Time Series (Academic Press, London).Google Scholar
- [46] (2001) Information sharing in a supply chain: A note on its value when demand is nonstationary. Management Sci. 47(4):605–610.Link, Google Scholar
- [47] (1987) Real and Complex Analysis, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
- [48] (1928) Sur la théorie des polynomes orthogonaux à une variable complexe. J. Societe Physico-Mathematique Leningrad 22:155–179.Google Scholar
- [49] (1929) Sur les valeurs limites des fonctions, régulières à l’interieur d’un cercle. J. Societe Physico-Mathematique Leningrad 2(2):22–37.Google Scholar
- [50] (1965) Optimal policy for a multi-product, dynamic nonstationary inventory problem. Management Sci. 12(3):206–222.Link, Google Scholar
- [51] (2016) The bullwhip effect: Progress, trends and directions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250(3):691–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [52] (2004) Evolution of ARMA demand in supply chains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 6(2):195–198.Link, Google Scholar

