Bilateral Trade: A Regret Minimization Perspective
Published Online:17 Feb 2023https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2023.1351
References
- [1] (2014) Bandits with concave rewards and convex knapsacks. Proc. ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC) (ACM, New York), 989–1006.Google Scholar
- [2] (2013) Learning prices for repeated auctions with strategic buyers. Proc. Internat. Conf. Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY), 1169–1177.Google Scholar
- [3] (2002) Neural Network Learning: Theoretical Foundations. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
- [4] (2009) Minimax policies for adversarial and stochastic bandits. Proc. 22nd Ann. Conf. Learning Theory (COLT). https://www.cs.mcgill.ca/∼colt2009/proceedings.html.Google Scholar
- [5] (2022) An α-regret analysis of adversarial bilateral trade. Proc. Ann. Conf. Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY).Google Scholar
- [6] (2015) Dynamic pricing with limited supply. ACM Trans. Econom. Comput. 3(1):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [7] (2018) Bandits with knapsacks. J. ACM 65(3):1–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [8] (2014) Partial monitoring—classification, regret bounds, and algorithms. Math. Oper. Res. 39(4):967–997.Link, Google Scholar
- [9] (2005) Near-optimal online auctions. Proc. ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA) (ACM, New York), 1156–1163.Google Scholar
- [10] (2004) Online learning in online auctions. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 324(2–3):137–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [11] (2014) Reallocation mechanisms. Proc. ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC) (ACM, New York), 617.Google Scholar
- [12] (2021) (Almost) efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. Games Econom. Behav. 130:369–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [13] (2021) Truthful mechanisms for two-sided markets via prophet inequalities. Proc. ACM Conf. Economics and Computation (EC) (ACM, New York), 202–203.Google Scholar
- [14] (2012) Dynamic pricing under a general parametric choice model. Oper. Res. 60(4):965–980.Link, Google Scholar
- [15] (2017) Approximating gains from trade in two-sided markets via simple mechanisms. Proc. ACM Conf. Economics and Computation (EC) (ACM, New York), 589–590.Google Scholar
- [16] (2017) Online auctions and multi-scale online learning. Proc. ACM Conf. Econom. Computat. (EC) (ACM, New York), 497–514.Google Scholar
- [17] (2019) Dynamic pricing with finitely many unknown valuations. Proc. 30th Internat. Conf. Algorithmic Learning Theory (PMLR), 247–273.Google Scholar
- [18] (2021) A regret analysis of bilateral trade. Proc. ACM Conf. Econom. Computat. (EC) (ACM, New York), 289–309.Google Scholar
- [19] (2015) Regret minimization for reserve prices in second-price auctions. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 61(1):549–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [20] (2006) Prediction, Learning, and Games. (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- [21] (2006) Regret minimization under partial monitoring. Math. Oper. Res. 31(3):562–580.Link, Google Scholar
- [22] (2021) A nearest neighbor characterization of Lebesgue points in metric measure spaces. Math. Stat. Learning 3(1):71–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [23] (2020) Feature-based dynamic pricing. Management Sci. 66(11):4921–4943.Link, Google Scholar
- [24] (2016) Approximately efficient double auctions with strong budget balance. ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA) (ACM, New York), 1424–1443.Google Scholar
- [25] (2017) Fixed price approximability of the optimal gain from trade. Internat. Conf. Web Internet Econom. (Springer, Berlin), 146–160.Google Scholar
- [26] (1965) Behavior of sequential predictors of binary sequences. Proc. 4th Prague Conf. Information Theory, Statistical Decision Functions and Random Processes, 263–272 (Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences).Google Scholar
- [27] (2016) Learning in auctions: Regret is hard, envy is easy. IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 219–228.Google Scholar
- [28] (2015) Dynamic pricing and learning: Historical origins, current research, and new directions. Surv. Oper. Res. Management Sci. 20(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [29] (2020) Discontinuous demand functions: Estimation and pricing. Management Sci. 66(10):4516–4534.Link, Google Scholar
- [30] (2022) Approximately efficient bilateral trade. Proc. ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) (ACM, New York), 718–721.Google Scholar
- [31] (2019) Perfect Bayesian equilibria in repeated sales. Games Econom. Behav. 118:570–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [32] (2018) Weakly consistent optimal pricing algorithms in repeated posted-price auctions with strategic buyer. Proc. Internat. Conf. Machine Learning, (PMLR), 1318–1327.Google Scholar
- [33] (2021) Efficient two-sided markets with limited information. Proc. Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) (ACM, New York), 1452–1465.Google Scholar
- [34] (2022) Improved approximation to first-best gains-from-trade. WINE. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 13778 (Springer, New York), 204–218.Google Scholar
- [35] (1987) Robust trading mechanisms. J. Econom. Theory 42(1):94–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [36] (2016) Adaptive contract design for crowdsourcing markets: Bandit algorithms for repeated principal-agent problems. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. 55:317–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [37] (2022) Fixed-price approximations in bilateral trade. Proc. ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA) (ACM, New York), 2964–2985.Google Scholar
- [38] (2003) The value of knowing a demand curve: Bounds on regret for online posted-price auctions. Proc. IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 594–605.Google Scholar
- [39] (2020) Bandit Algorithms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- [40] (2001) Improved bounds on the sample complexity of learning. J. Comput. System Sci. 62(3):516–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [41] (2016) Learning and efficiency in games with dynamic population. Proc. ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA) (ACM, New York), 120–129.Google Scholar
- [42] (1990) The tight constant in the Dvoretzky-Kiefer-Wolfowitz inequality. Ann. Probab. 18(3):1269–1283.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [43] (2014) Optimal regret minimization in posted-price auctions with strategic buyers. Proc. Internat. Conf. Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY), 1871–1879.Google Scholar
- [44] (1983) Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. J. Econom. Theory. 29(2):265–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [45] (2021) On the tight constant in the multivariate Dvoretzky–Kiefer–Wolfowitz inequality. Statist. Probab. Lett. 173:109088.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [46] (2019) Introduction to multi-armed bandits. Foundations Trends Machine Learn. 12(1–2):1–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [47] (2015) Dynamic pricing under model uncertainty. Tutorial given at the 16th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (ACM, New York).Google Scholar
- [48] (1961) Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance. 16(1):8–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [49] (1991) Probability with Martingales (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar

