A Geometric Model of Opinion Polarization

References

• [1] Amaldi E, Kann V (1998) On the approximability of minimizing nonzero variables or unsatisfied relations in linear systems. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 209(1–2):237–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [2] Axelrod R (1997) The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. J. Conflict Resolution 41(2):203–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [3] Bail CA, Argyle LP, Brown TW, Bumpus JP, Chen H, Hunzaker MBF, Lee J, Mann M, Merhout F, Volfovsky A (2018) Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(37):9216–9221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [4] Bakshy E, Messing S, Adamic LA (2015) Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348(6239):1130–1132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [5] Bala V, Goyal S (1998) Learning from neighbours. Rev. Econom. Stud. 65(3):595–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [6] Baldassarri D (2007) Crosscutting social spheres? Political polarization and the social roots of pluralism. PhD thesis, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• [7] Baldassarri D, Bearman P (2007) Dynamics of political polarization. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(5):784–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [8] Baldassarri D, Gelman A (2008) Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion. Amer. J. Sociol. 114(2):408–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [9] BBC (2020) Trump signs executive order targeting Twitter after fact-checking row. (May 29), https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-52843986.Google Scholar
• [10] Ben-David S, Simon HU (2000) Efficient learning of linear perceptrons. Leen TK, Dietterich TG, Tresp V, eds. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 189–195.Google Scholar
• [11] Ben-David S, Eiron N, Long PM (2003) On the difficulty of approximately maximizing agreements. J. Comput. System Sci. 66(3):496–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [12] Ben-David S, Eiron N, Simon HU (2002) The computational complexity of densest region detection. J. Comput. System Sci. 64(1):22–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [13] Błasiok J, Guruswami V, Nakkiran P, Rudra A, Sudan M (2018) General strong polarization. Diakonikolas I, Kempe D, General Chairs; Henzinger M, Program Chair. Sympos. Theory Comput. (STOC) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 485–492.Google Scholar
• [14] Boyd S, Vandenberghe L (2004) Convex Optimization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• [15] Bshouty NH, Burroughs L (2006) Maximizing agreements and coagnostic learning. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 350(1):24–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [16] Conover MD, Ratkiewicz J, Francisco M, Gonçalves B, Menczer F, Flammini A (2011) Political polarization on Twitter. Adamic LA, Baeza-Yates R, Counts S, eds. Internat. Conf. Weblogs Social Media (ICWSM), (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA) 89–96.Google Scholar
• [17] Dandekar P, Goel A, Lee DT (2013) Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110(15):5791–5796.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [18] Del Vicario M, Scala A, Caldarelli G, Stanley HE, Quattrociocchi W (2017) Modeling confirmation bias and polarization. Sci. Rep. 7:40391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [19] Feldman V, Gopalan P, Khot S, Ponnuswami AK (2006) New results for learning noisy parities and halfspaces. Arora S, Program Chair. Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (FOCS) (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA), 563–574.Google Scholar
• [20] Fiorina MP, Abrams SJ (2008) Political polarization in the American public. Annual Rev. Political Sci. 11:563–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [21] Fiorina MP, Abrams SJ, Pope JC (2005) Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America (Pearson-Longman, New York).Google Scholar
• [22] Fortin J (2018) A list of the companies cutting ties with the N.R.A. New York Times (February 24), https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/24/business/nra-companies-boycott.html.Google Scholar
• [23] Gaitonde J, Kleinberg J, Tardos E (2021) Polarization in geometric opinion dynamics. Biró P, General Chair; Chawla S, Echenique F, Program Chairs. ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (EC) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 499–519.Google Scholar
• [24] Garimella K (2018) Polarization on social media. PhD thesis, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.Google Scholar
• [25] Garimella K, Gionis A, Parotsidis N, Tatti N (2017) Balancing information exposure in social networks. von Luxburg U, Guyon I, Bengio S, Wallach H, Fergus R, eds. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (NIPS) (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 4663–4671.Google Scholar
• [26] Garimella K, Morales GDF, Gionis A, Mathioudakis M (2017) Reducing controversy by connecting opposing views. de Rijke M, Shokouhi M, General Chairs; Tomkins A, Zhang M, Program Chairs. Internat. Conf. Web Search Data Mining (WSDM) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 81–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [27] Guruswami V, Raghavendra P (2009) Hardness of learning halfspaces with noise. SIAM J. Comput. 39(2):742–765.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [28] Hegselmann R, Krause U (2002) Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence. Models, analysis, and simulation. J. Artificial Soc. Soc. Simulation 5(3):1–2.Google Scholar
• [29] Iyengar S, Westwood SJ (2015) Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. Amer. J. Political Sci. 59(3):690–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [30] Jadbabaie A, Motee N, Barahona M (2004) On the stability of the Kuramoto model of coupled nonlinear oscillators. Amer. Control Conf. (ACC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), vol. 5, 4296–4301. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1383555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [31] Krasa S, Polborn MK (2018) Political competition in legislative elections. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 112(4):809–825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [32] Kuziemko I, Washington E (2018) Why did the Democrats lose the South? Bringing new data to an old debate. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(10):2830–2867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [33] Lavine H, Borgida E, Sullivan JL (2000) On the relationship between attitude involvement and attitude accessibility: Toward a cognitive-motivational model of political information processing. Political Psych. 21(1):81–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [34] Lord CG, Ross L, Lepper MR (1979) Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(11):2098–2109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [35] Macy MW, Kitts JA, Flache A, Benard S (2003) Polarization in dynamic networks: A Hopfield model of emergent structure. Pattison P, Carley K, Breiger R, eds. Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers (National Academies Press, Washington, DC), 162–173.Google Scholar
• [36] Mossel E, Schoenebeck G (2010) Reaching consensus on social networks. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• [37] Mullainathan S, Shleifer A (2005) The market for news. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(4):1031–1053.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [38] Noah M (1998) Beyond individual differences: Social differentiation from first principles. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(3):309–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [39] Nowak A, Szamrej J, Latané B (1990) From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psych. Rev. 97(3):362–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [40] Pariser E (2011) The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think (Penguin, New York).Google Scholar
• [41] Parsegov SE, Proskurnikov AV, Tempo R, Friedkin NE (2017) Novel multidimensional models of opinion dynamics in social networks. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 62(5):2270–2285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [42] Perego J, Yuksel S (2022) Media competition and social disagreement. Econometrica 90(1):223–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [43] Pettigrew TF, Tropp LR (2006) A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(5):751–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [44] Pew Research Center (2014) Political polarization in the American public: How increasing ideological uniformity and partisan antipathy affect politics, compromise and everyday life. (June 12), https://www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/.Google Scholar
• [45] Prior M (2013) Media and political polarization. Annual Rev. Political Sci. 16:101–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [46] Sasahara K, Chen W, Peng H, Ciampaglia GL, Flammini A, Menczer F (2021) Social influence and unfollowing accelerate the emergence of echo chambers. J. Comput. Soc. Sci. 4(1):381–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [47] Saylor EA, Vittes KA, Sorenson SB (2004) Firearm advertising: Product depiction in consumer gun magazines. Evaluation Rev. 28(5):420–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [48] Shi G, Proutiere A, Johansson M, Baras JS, Johansson KH (2016) The evolution of beliefs over signed social networks. Oper. Res. 64(3):585–604.Link, Google Scholar
• [49] Sides J, Hopkins DJ, eds. (2015) Political Polarization in American Politics (Bloomsbury Publishing USA, New York).Google Scholar
• [50] Snyder B (2015) LGBT advertising: How brands are taking a stance on issues. Think with Google (March), https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/future-of-marketing/management-and-culture/diversity-and-inclusion/lgbt-advertising-brands-taking-stance-on-issues/.Google Scholar
• [51] Vinson DE, Scott JE, Lamont LM (1977) The role of personal values in marketing and consumer behavior. J. Marketing 41(2):44–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [52] Williams D (1991) Probability with Martingales (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• [53] Williams HT, McMurray JR, Kurz T, Lambert FH (2015) Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change. Global Environ. Change 32:126–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [54] Zaller JR (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar