Market Design with Distributional Objectives
References
- [1] (2021) Priority-based assignment with reserves and quotas. NBER Working Paper No. 28689, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- [2] (1981) General theory of best variants choice: Some aspects. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 26(5):1030–1040.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [3] (2003) Stable schedule matching under revealed preference. J. Econom. Theory 112(2):289–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [4] (2013) Matching with contracts: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(5):2050–2051.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [5] (2017) Large-scale affirmative action in school choice: Admissions to IITs in India. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):210–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [6] (2020) Dynamic reserves in matching markets. J. Econom. Theory 188:105069.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [7] (2018) College assignment as a large contest. J. Econom. Theory 175:88–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [8] (1969) Comments on bases in dependence structures. Bull. Australian Math. Soc. 1(2):161–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [9] (2021) Competitive equilibrium and trading networks: A network flow approach. Oper. Res. 69(1):114–147.Link, Google Scholar
- [10] (2025) Adaptive priority mechanisms. NBER Working Paper No. 34035, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- [11] (2017) Choice and matching. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 9(3):126–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [12] (2019) Stable matching in large economies. Econometrica 87(1):65–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [13] (2021) M♮ convexity and its applications in operations. Oper. Res. 69(5):1396–1408.Link, Google Scholar
- [14] (2019) School choice in Chile. Karlin A, Immorlica N, Johari R, eds. Proc. 2019 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. EC‘19 (ACM, New York), 325–343.Google Scholar
- [15] (2001) Civil service examinations: Evidence from the Northwest. Pearce S, Spiro A, Ebrey P, eds. Culture and Power in the Reconstitution of the Chinese Realm, 200–600, Harvard East Asian Monographs, 1st ed., vol. 200 (Harvard University Asia Center, Cambridge, MA), 99–121.Google Scholar
- [16] (2015) How to control controlled school choice. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(8):2679–2694.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [17] (2003) A generalized Gale–Shapley algorithm for a discrete-concave stable-marriage model. Ibaraki T, Katoh N, Ono H, eds. Algorithms Comput. 14th Internat. Symposium, ISAAC 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2906 (Springer, Berlin), 495–504.Google Scholar
- [18] (2014) School choice with controlled choice constraints: Hard bounds versus soft bounds. J. Econom. Theory 153:648–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [19] (2005) A note on the equivalence between substitutability and M♮ convexity. Pacific J. Optim. 1:243–252.Google Scholar
- [20] (2001) A matroid generalization of the stable matching polytope. Aardal K, Gerards B, eds. Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization (Springer, Berlin), 105–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [21] (2005) Submodular Functions and Optimization (Elsevier, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
- [22] (1968) Optimal assignments in an ordered set: An application of matroid theory. J. Combin. Theory 4(2):176–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [23] (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Amer. Math. Monthly 69(1):9–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [24] (2013) Effective affirmative action in school choice. Theoret. Econom. 8(2):325–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [25] (2022) Interdistrict school choice: A theory of student assignment. J. Econom. Theory 201:105441.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [26] (2025) Market design with distributional objectives: Efficiency, incentives, and property rights. J. Econom. Theory 230:106099.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [27] (2005) Matching with contracts. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(4):913–935.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [28] (2019) Full substitutability. Theoret. Econom. 14(4):1535–1590.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [29] (2025) Meritocracy versus diversity. J. Econom. Theory 228:106047.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [30] (2015) Efficient matching under distributional constraints: Theory and applications. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(1):67–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [31] (2017) Stability concepts in matching with distributional constraints. J. Econom. Theory 168:107–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [32] (2018) Stability and strategy-proofness for matching with constraints: A necessary and sufficient condition. Theoret. Econom. 13(2):761–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [33] (2020) Accommodating various policy goals in matching with constraints. Japanese Econom. Rev. 71(1):101–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [34] (1982) Job matching, coalition formation, and gross substitutes. Econometrica 50(6):1483–1504.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [35] (2020) Job matching under constraints. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(9):2935–2947.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [36] (2023) Job matching with subsidy and taxation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 91(1):372–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [37] (2018) Designing matching mechanisms under constraints: An approach from discrete convex analysis. J. Econom. Theory 176:803–833.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [38] (2023) Microeconomic Foundations I: Choice and Competitive Markets, vol. 1 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
- [39] (2026) Quota adjustment process. Amer. Econom. Rev. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- [40] (2021) When is a monotone function cyclically monotone? Theoret. Econom. 16(3):853–879.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [41] (2019) The Meritocracy Trap: How America’s Foundational Myth Feeds Inequality, Dismantles the Middle Class, and Devours the Elite (Penguin UK, New York).Google Scholar
- [42] (1995) Microeconomic Theory (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
- [43] (2003) Discrete Convex Analysis (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia).Crossref, Google Scholar
- [44] (2016) Discrete convex analysis: A tool for economics and game theory. J. Mechanism Institution Design 1(1):151–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [45] (2003) Quasi M-convex and L-convex functions—Quasiconvexity in discrete optimization. Discrete Appl. Math. 131(2):467–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [46] (2018) Simpler exchange axioms for M-concave functions on generalized polymatroids. Japanese J. Indust. Appl. Math. 35(1):235–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [47] (2015) On the lattice structure of stable allocations in two-sided discrete-concave market. Math. Oper. Res. 40(2):460–473.Link, Google Scholar
- [48] (2006) Matroid Theory, vol. 3 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
- [49] (2017) Gross substitutability: An algorithmic survey. Games Econom. Behav. 106:294–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [50] (1973) Path independence, rationality, and social choice. Econometrica 41(6):1075–1091.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [51] (1984) Stability and polarization of interests in job matching. Econometrica 52(1):47–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [52] (2022) Affirmative action in India via vertical, horizontal, and overlapping reservations. Econometrica 90(3):1143–1176.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [53] (2004) Affirmative Action Around the World: An Empirical Study (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
- [54] (2019) Matroidal choice functions. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 33(3):1712–1724.Crossref, Google Scholar
- [55] (2023) Rationalizing path-independent choice rules. Preprint, submitted March 2, https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.00892.Google Scholar

