Market Design with Distributional Objectives

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2024.0712

References

  • [1] Abdulkadiroglu A, Grigoryan A (2021) Priority-based assignment with reserves and quotas. NBER Working Paper No. 28689, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • [2] Aizerman MA, Malishevski AV (1981) General theory of best variants choice: Some aspects. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 26(5):1030–1040.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [3] Alkan A, Gale D (2003) Stable schedule matching under revealed preference. J. Econom. Theory 112(2):289–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [4] Aygün O, Sönmez T (2013) Matching with contracts: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(5):2050–2051.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [5] Aygün O, Turhan B (2017) Large-scale affirmative action in school choice: Admissions to IITs in India. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):210–213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [6] Aygün O, Turhan B (2020) Dynamic reserves in matching markets. J. Econom. Theory 188:105069.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [7] Bodoh-Creed AL, Hickman BR (2018) College assignment as a large contest. J. Econom. Theory 175:88–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [8] Brualdi RA (1969) Comments on bases in dependence structures. Bull. Australian Math. Soc. 1(2):161–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [9] Candogan O, Epitropou M, Vohra RV (2021) Competitive equilibrium and trading networks: A network flow approach. Oper. Res. 69(1):114–147.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [10] Çelebi O, Flynn JP (2025) Adaptive priority mechanisms. NBER Working Paper No. 34035, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • [11] Chambers CP, Yenmez MB (2017) Choice and matching. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 9(3):126–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [12] Che Y-K, Kim J, Kojima F (2019) Stable matching in large economies. Econometrica 87(1):65–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [13] Chen X, Li M (2021) M♮ convexity and its applications in operations. Oper. Res. 69(5):1396–1408.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [14] Correa J, Epstein R, Escobar J, Rios I, Bahamondes B, Bonet C, Epstein N, et al. (2019) School choice in Chile. Karlin A, Immorlica N, Johari R, eds. Proc. 2019 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. EC‘19 (ACM, New York), 325–343.Google Scholar
  • [15] Dien AE (2001) Civil service examinations: Evidence from the Northwest. Pearce S, Spiro A, Ebrey P, eds. Culture and Power in the Reconstitution of the Chinese Realm, 200–600, Harvard East Asian Monographs, 1st ed., vol. 200 (Harvard University Asia Center, Cambridge, MA), 99–121.Google Scholar
  • [16] Echenique F, Yenmez MB (2015) How to control controlled school choice. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(8):2679–2694.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [17] Eguchi A, Fujishige S, Tamura A (2003) A generalized Gale–Shapley algorithm for a discrete-concave stable-marriage model. Ibaraki T, Katoh N, Ono H, eds. Algorithms Comput. 14th Internat. Symposium, ISAAC 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2906 (Springer, Berlin), 495–504.Google Scholar
  • [18] Ehlers L, Hafalir IE, Bumin Yenmez M, Yildirim MA (2014) School choice with controlled choice constraints: Hard bounds versus soft bounds. J. Econom. Theory 153:648–683.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [19] Farooq R, Shioura A (2005) A note on the equivalence between substitutability and M♮ convexity. Pacific J. Optim. 1:243–252.Google Scholar
  • [20] Fleiner T (2001) A matroid generalization of the stable matching polytope. Aardal K, Gerards B, eds. Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization (Springer, Berlin), 105–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [21] Fujishige S (2005) Submodular Functions and Optimization (Elsevier, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  • [22] Gale D (1968) Optimal assignments in an ordered set: An application of matroid theory. J. Combin. Theory 4(2):176–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [23] Gale D, Shapley LS (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Amer. Math. Monthly 69(1):9–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [24] Hafalir IE, Bumin Yenmez M, Yildirim MA (2013) Effective affirmative action in school choice. Theoret. Econom. 8(2):325–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [25] Hafalir IE, Kojima F, Bumin Yenmez M (2022) Interdistrict school choice: A theory of student assignment. J. Econom. Theory 201:105441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [26] Hafalir IE, Kojima F, Bumin Yenmez M (2025) Market design with distributional objectives: Efficiency, incentives, and property rights. J. Econom. Theory 230:106099.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [27] Hatfield JW, Milgrom PR (2005) Matching with contracts. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(4):913–935.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [28] Hatfield JW, Kominers SD, Nichifor A, Ostrovsky M, Westkamp A (2019) Full substitutability. Theoret. Econom. 14(4):1535–1590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [29] Imamura K (2025) Meritocracy versus diversity. J. Econom. Theory 228:106047.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [30] Kamada Y, Kojima F (2015) Efficient matching under distributional constraints: Theory and applications. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(1):67–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [31] Kamada Y, Kojima F (2017) Stability concepts in matching with distributional constraints. J. Econom. Theory 168:107–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [32] Kamada Y, Kojima F (2018) Stability and strategy-proofness for matching with constraints: A necessary and sufficient condition. Theoret. Econom. 13(2):761–794.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [33] Kamada Y, Kojima F (2020) Accommodating various policy goals in matching with constraints. Japanese Econom. Rev. 71(1):101–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [34] Kelso AS, Crawford VP (1982) Job matching, coalition formation, and gross substitutes. Econometrica 50(6):1483–1504.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [35] Kojima F, Sun N, Yu NN (2020) Job matching under constraints. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(9):2935–2947.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [36] Kojima F, Sun N, Yu NN (2023) Job matching with subsidy and taxation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 91(1):372–402.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [37] Kojima F, Tamura A, Yokoo M (2018) Designing matching mechanisms under constraints: An approach from discrete convex analysis. J. Econom. Theory 176:803–833.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [38] Kreps DM (2023) Microeconomic Foundations I: Choice and Competitive Markets, vol. 1 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • [39] Kumano T, Kurino M (2026) Quota adjustment process. Amer. Econom. Rev. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • [40] Kushnir AI, Lokutsievskiy LV (2021) When is a monotone function cyclically monotone? Theoret. Econom. 16(3):853–879.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [41] Markovits D (2019) The Meritocracy Trap: How America’s Foundational Myth Feeds Inequality, Dismantles the Middle Class, and Devours the Elite (Penguin UK, New York).Google Scholar
  • [42] Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic Theory (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • [43] Murota K (2003) Discrete Convex Analysis (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [44] Murota K (2016) Discrete convex analysis: A tool for economics and game theory. J. Mechanism Institution Design 1(1):151–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [45] Murota K, Shioura A (2003) Quasi M-convex and L-convex functions—Quasiconvexity in discrete optimization. Discrete Appl. Math. 131(2):467–494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [46] Murota K, Shioura A (2018) Simpler exchange axioms for M-concave functions on generalized polymatroids. Japanese J. Indust. Appl. Math. 35(1):235–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [47] Murota K, Yokoi Y (2015) On the lattice structure of stable allocations in two-sided discrete-concave market. Math. Oper. Res. 40(2):460–473.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • [48] Oxley JG (2006) Matroid Theory, vol. 3 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • [49] Paes Leme R (2017) Gross substitutability: An algorithmic survey. Games Econom. Behav. 106:294–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [50] Plott CR (1973) Path independence, rationality, and social choice. Econometrica 41(6):1075–1091.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [51] Roth AE (1984) Stability and polarization of interests in job matching. Econometrica 52(1):47–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [52] Sönmez T, Yenmez MB (2022) Affirmative action in India via vertical, horizontal, and overlapping reservations. Econometrica 90(3):1143–1176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [53] Sowell T (2004) Affirmative Action Around the World: An Empirical Study (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • [54] Yokoi Y (2019) Matroidal choice functions. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 33(3):1712–1724.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • [55] Yokote K, Hafalir IE, Kojima F, Yenmez MB (2023) Rationalizing path-independent choice rules. Preprint, submitted March 2, https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.00892.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.