Strategic Bonding Curves in Automated Market Makers

References

• [1] Adams H, Zinsmeister N, Salem M, Keefer R, Robinson D (2021) Uniswap v3 core. Technical report, Uniswap.Google Scholar
• [2] Adams H, Salem M, Zinsmeister N, Reynolds S, Adams A, Pote W, Toda M, Henshaw A, Williams E, Robinson D (2023) Uniswap v4 core [draft]. Working paper.Google Scholar
• [3] Agarwal A, Gobet E (2025) Optimal exit from Uniswap v3 and best expected return for a liquidity provider. Preprint, submitted September 8, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5422975.Google Scholar
• [4] Al-Mohy AH, Higham NJ (2011) Computing the action of the matrix exponential, with an application to exponential integrators. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 33(2):488–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [5] Amoussou-Guenou Y, Biais B, Potop-Butucaru M, Tucci-Piergiovanni S (2024) Committee-based blockchains as games between opportunistic players and adversaries. Rev. Financial Stud. 37(2):409–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [6] Angeris G, Chitra T (2020) Improved price oracles: Constant function market makers. Meiklejohn S, Shelat A, eds. Proc. 2nd ACM Conf. Adv. Financial Tech. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 80–91.Google Scholar
• [7] Angeris G, Chitra T, Evans A (2022) When does the tail wag the dog? Curvature and market making. Cryptoeconomic Systems 2(1):58320208.e9e6b7ce.Google Scholar
• [8] Angeris G, Evans A, Chitra T (2021) Replicating market makers. Preprint, submitted March 26, https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.14769.Google Scholar
• [9] Angeris G, Kao HT, Chiang R, Noyes C, Chitra T (2019) An analysis of Uniswap markets. Preprint, submitted November 8, https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.03380.Google Scholar
• [10] Aqsha A, Bergault P, Sánchez-Betancourt L (2025) Equilibrium reward for liquidity providers in automated market makers. Preprint, submitted March 28, https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22502.Google Scholar
• [11] Avellaneda M, Stoikov S (2008) High-frequency trading in a limit order book. Quant. Finance 8(3):217–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [12] Baggiani L, Herdegen M, Sánchez-Betancourt L (2025) Optimal dynamic fees in automated market makers. Preprint, submitted June 3, https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.02869.Google Scholar
• [13] Bergault P, Bieber S, Sánchez-Betancourt L (2025) Optimal exit time for liquidity providers in automated market makers. Preprint, submitted September 8, https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06510.Google Scholar
• [14] Bergault P, Drissi F, Guéant O (2022) Multi-asset optimal execution and statistical arbitrage strategies under Ornstein–Uhlenbeck dynamics. SIAM J. Financial Math. 13(1):353–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [15] Biais B, Glosten L, Spatt C (2005) Market microstructure: A survey of microfoundations, empirical results, and policy implications. J. Financial Markets 8(2):217–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [16] Biais B, Bisière C, Bouvard M, Casamatta C, Menkveld AJ (2023) Equilibrium Bitcoin pricing. J. Finance 78(2):967–1014.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [17] Biais B, Capponi A, Cong LW, Gaur V, Giesecke K (2023) Advances in blockchain and crypto economics. Management Sci. 69(11):6417–6426.Link, Google Scholar
• [18] Bichuch M, Feinstein Z (2022) Axioms for automated market makers: A mathematical framework in fintech and decentralized finance. Preprint, submitted October 3, https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.01227.Google Scholar
• [19] Bichuch M, Feinstein Z (2024) DeFi arbitrage in hedged liquidity tokens. Preprint, submitted September 17, https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.11339.Google Scholar
• [20] Bondarenko O (2001) Competing market makers, liquidity provision, and bid–ask spreads. J. Financial Markets 4(3):269–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [21] Bouzianis G, Hughston LP, Sánchez-Betancourt L (2024) Information-based trading. Internat. J. Theoret. Appl. Finance 27(03n04):2350030.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [22] Calcagno R, Lovo S (2006) Bid-ask price competition with asymmetric information between market-makers. Rev. Econom. Stud. 73(2):329–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [23] Caldarelli G (2020) Understanding the blockchain oracle problem: A call for action. Information 11(11):509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [24] Caldarelli G, Ellul J (2021) The blockchain oracle problem in decentralized finance—A multivocal approach. Appl. Sci. 11(16):7572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [25] Capponi A, Jia R (2021) The adoption of blockchain-based decentralized exchanges. Preprint, submitted March 16, https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17425.Google Scholar
• [26] Capponi A, Cartea Á, Drissi F (2026) The viability of blockchain markets under discrete clearing and paid priority. Preprint, submitted May 17, https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17425.Google Scholar
• [27] Capponi A, Jia R, Yu S (2024) Price discovery on decentralized exchanges. Preprint, submitted October 17, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4236993.Google Scholar
• [28] Cartea Á, Sánchez-Betancourt L (2023) Optimal execution with stochastic delay. Finance Stochastics 27(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [29] Cartea Á, Drissi F, Monga M (2023) Execution and statistical arbitrage with signals in multiple automated market makers. 2023 IEEE 43rd Internat. Conf. Distributed Comput. Systems Workshops (ICDCSW) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 37–42.Google Scholar
• [30] Cartea Á, Drissi F, Monga M (2023) Predictable losses of liquidity provision in constant function markets and concentrated liquidity markets. Appl. Math. Finance 30(2):69–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [31] Cartea Á, Drissi F, Monga M (2024) Decentralized finance and automated market making: Predictable loss and optimal liquidity provision. SIAM J. Financial Math. 15(3):931–959.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [32] Cartea Á, Drissi F, Monga M (2025) Decentralised finance and automated market making: Execution and speculation. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 177(C):105134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [33] Cartea Á, Drissi F, Palmari G (2025) Multi-task Gaussian processes for tactical execution under regime shifts. Preprint, submitted December 25, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5946898.Google Scholar
• [34] Cartea Á, Drissi F, Saleh F (2026) The economics of regulating tokenized securities. Preprint, submitted July 13, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6942338.Google Scholar
• [35] Cartea Á, Jaimungal S, Penalva J (2015) Algorithmic and High-Frequency Trading (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• [36] Cartea Á, Drissi F, Sánchez-Betancourt L, Siska D, Szpruch L (2023) Automated market makers designs beyond constant functions. Preprint, submitted May 25, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4459177.Google Scholar
• [37] Casgrain P, Jaimungal S (2019) Trading algorithms with learning in latent alpha models. Math. Finance 29(3):735–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [38] Chang PG, Durán-Martín G, Shestopaloff AY, Jones M, Murphy K (2023) Low-rank extended Kalman filtering for online learning of neural networks from streaming data. Preprint, submitted May 31, https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.19535.Google Scholar
• [39] Chitra T, Kulkarni K, Srinivasan K (2025) Optimal routing in the presence of hooks: Three case studies. Preprint, submitted February 4, https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.02059.Google Scholar
• [40] Cohen S, Vidales MS, Šiška D, Szpruch Ł (2023) Inefficiency of CFMs: Hedging perspective and agent-based simulations. Preprint, submitted February 8, https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04345.Google Scholar
• [41] Cong LW, Li Y, Wang N (2021) Tokenomics: Dynamic adoption and valuation. Rev. Financial Stud. 34(3):1105–1155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [42] Cong LW, Hui X, Tucker C, Zhou L (2023) Scaling smart contracts via layer-2 technologies: Some empirical evidence. Management Sci. 69(12):7306–7316.Link, Google Scholar
• [43] Curry MJ, Fan Z, Parkes DC (2024) Optimal automated market makers: Differentiable economics and strong duality. Preprint, submitted February 14, https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.09129.Google Scholar
• [44] Diamandis T, Resnick M, Chitra T, Angeris G (2024) An efficient algorithm for optimal routing through constant function market makers. Baldimtsi F, Cachin C, eds. Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2023, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 13951 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 128–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [45] Drissi F (2022) Solvability of differential Riccati equations and applications to algorithmic trading with signals. Appl. Math. Finance 29(6):457–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [46] Drissi F (2023) Models of market liquidity: Applications to traditional markets and automated market makers. Preprint, submitted May 9, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4424010.Google Scholar
• [47] Duran-Martin G (2025) Adaptive, robust and scalable Bayesian filtering for online learning. Preprint, submitted May 12, https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07267.Google Scholar
• [48] Engel D, Herlihy M (2021) Presentation and publication: Loss and slippage in networks of automated market makers. Preprint, submitted October 18, https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.09872.Google Scholar
• [49] Evans A (2021) Liquidity provider returns in geometric mean markets. Cryptoeconomic Systems 1(2):58320208.56ddae1b.Google Scholar
• [50] Evans A, Angeris G, Chitra T (2021) Optimal fees for geometric mean market makers. Bernhard M, Bracciali A, Gudgeon L, Haines T, Klages-Mundt A, Matsuo S, Perez D, Sala M, Werner S, eds. Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2021 International Workshops: CoDecFin, DeFi, VOTING, and WTSC, Virtual Event, March 5, 2021, Revised Selected Papers, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12676 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 65–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [51] Foster FD, Viswanathan S (1996) Strategic trading when agents forecast the forecasts of others. J. Finance 51(4):1437–1478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [52] Fukasawa M, Maire B, Wunsch M (2023) Model-free hedging of impermanent loss in geometric mean market makers. Preprint, submitted March 20, https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11118.Google Scholar
• [53] Glosten LR, Milgrom PR (1985) Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. J. Financial Econom. 14(1):71–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [54] Goyal M, Ramseyer G, Goel A, Mazières D (2023) Finding the right curve: Optimal design of constant function market makers. Leyton-Brown K, Hartline JD, Samuelson L, eds. Proc. 24th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 783–812.Google Scholar
• [55] Green TC (2004) Economic news and the impact of trading on bond prices. J. Finance 59(3):1201–1233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [56] Hasbrouck J, Rivera TJ, Saleh F (2022) The need for fees at a DEX: How increases in fees can increase DEX trading volume. Preprint, submitted August 26, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4192925.Google Scholar
• [57] Hasbrouck J, Rivera TJ, Saleh F (2023) An economic model of a decentralized exchange with concentrated liquidity. Preprint, submitted August 3, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4529513.Google Scholar
• [58] Ho TS, Stoll HR (1983) The dynamics of dealer markets under competition. J. Finance 38(4):1053–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [59] Huddart S, Hughes JS, Levine CB (2001) Public disclosure and dissimulation of insider trades. Econometrica 69(3):665–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [60] Jaimungal S, Saporito YF, Souza MO, Thamsten Y (2023) Optimal trading in automatic market makers with deep learning. Preprint, submitted April 5, https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02180.Google Scholar
• [61] Lehar A, Parlour CA (2021) Decentralized exchanges. Preprint, submitted August 16, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3905316.Google Scholar
• [62] Li S, Wang X, Ye M (2021) Who provides liquidity, and when? J. Financial Econom. 141(3):968–980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [63] Li T, Naik S, Papanicolaou A, Schönleber L (2023) Yield farming for liquidity provision. Preprint, submitted April 26, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4422213.Google Scholar
• [64] Liu Y, Lu Q, Zhu L, Paik H-Y, Staples M (2023) A systematic literature review on blockchain governance. J. Systems Software 197(C):111576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [65] Loesch S, Hindman N, Richardson MB, Welch N (2021) Impermanent loss in Uniswap v3. Preprint, submitted November 17, https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.09192.Google Scholar
• [66] Malinova K, Park A (2023) Learning from DeFi: Would automated market makers improve equity trading? Preprint, submitted August 7, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4531670.Google Scholar
• [67] Massa M, Simonov A (2003) Reputation and interdealer trading: A microstructure analysis of the treasury bond market. J. Financial Markets 6(2):99–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [68] Milionis J, Moallemi CC, Roughgarden T (2023) Automated market making and arbitrage profits in the presence of fees. Preprint, submitted May 24, https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14604.Google Scholar
• [69] Milionis J, Moallemi CC, Roughgarden T, Zhang AL (2022) Automated market making and loss-versus-rebalancing. Preprint, submitted August 11, https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.06046.Google Scholar
• [70] Nadkarni V, Kulkarni S, Viswanath P (2024) Adaptive curves for optimally efficient market making. Preprint, submitted June 19, https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13794.Google Scholar
• [71] Neuder M, Rao R, Moroz DJ, Parkes DC (2021) Strategic liquidity provision in Uniswap v3. Preprint, submitted June 22, https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.12033.Google Scholar
• [72] Park A (2023) The conceptual flaws of decentralized automated market making. Management Sci. 69(11):6731–6751.Link, Google Scholar
• [73] Parlour CA, Seppi DJ (2003) Liquidity-based competition for order flow. Rev. Financial Stud. 16(2):301–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [74] Sabate-Vidales M, Šiška D (2023) The case for variable fees in constant product markets: An agent based simulation. Matsuo A, Gudgeon L, Klages-Mundt A, Perez Hernandez D, Werner S, Haines T, Essex A, Bracciali A, Sala M, eds. Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2022 International Workshops. FC 2022, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 13412 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 225–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• [75] Uniswap Labs (2025) Uniswap v4 documentation: Swap routing guide. Accessed August 17, 2025, https://docs.uniswap.org/contracts/v4/guides/swap-routing.Google Scholar
• [76] Wang Y, Chen Y, Wu H, Zhou L, Deng S, Wattenhofer R (2022) Cyclic arbitrage in decentralized exchanges. Companion Proc. Web Conf. 2022 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 12–19.Google Scholar