A General Class of Greedily Solvable Linear Programs

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.23.4.892

References

  • Adler I., Hoffman A. J., Shamir R. Monge and feasibility sequences in general flow problems. Discrete Appl. Math. (1993) 44:21–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adler I., Shamir R., Du D.-Z., Pardalos P. M. Greedily solvable transportation networks and edge-guided vertex elimination. Network Optimization Problems: Algorithms, Applications and Complexity (1993) (World Scientific)1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aggarwal A., Klawe M. M. Applications of generalized matrix searching to geometric algorithms. Discrete Appl. math. (1990) 27:3–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aggarwal A., Klawe M. M., Moran S., Shor P., Wilber R. Geometric applications of a matrix-searching algorithm. Algorithmica (1987) 2:195–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aggarwal A., Park J. K. Sequential searching in multi-dimensional monotone arrays. (1989a) . Research report RC 15128, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown HeightsGoogle Scholar
  • Aggarwal A., Park J. K. Parallel searching in multi-dimensional monotone arrays. (1989b) . Research report RC 14826, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown HeightsGoogle Scholar
  • Aggarwal A., Park J. K. Improved algorithms for economic lot-size problems. Oper. Res. (1993) 41:549–571LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Balas E., Saltzman M. J. Facets of the three-index assignment polytope. Discrete Appl. Math. (1989) 23:201–229CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandelt H. J., Crama Y., Spieksma F. C. R. Approximation algorithms for multi-dimensional assignment problems with decomposable costs. Discrete Appl. Math. (1994) 49:25–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bein W. W., Brucker P., Pathak P. K. Monge properties in higher dimensions. (1991) . Preprint 134, Universität OsnabrückGoogle Scholar
  • Bein W. W., Brucker P., Park J. K., Pathak P. K. A Monge property for the d-dimensional transportation problem. Discrete Appl. Math. (1995) 58:97–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birkhoff G.Lattice Theory (1967) 3rd ed.(Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ., 25. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI) Google Scholar
  • Burkard R. E., Klinz B., Rudolf R. Perspectives of Monge properties in optimization. Discrete Appl. Math. (1996) 70:95–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crama Y., Spieksma F. C. R. Approximation algorithms for three-dimensional assignment problems with triangle inequalities. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1992) 60:273–279CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dietrich B. L. Monge sequences, antimatroids, and the transportation problem with forbidden arcs. Linear Algebra Appl. (1990) 39:133–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmonds J., Guy R., et al. Submodular functions, matroids and certain polyhedra. Combinatorial Structures and Their Applications (1970) (Gordon and Breach, New York) 69–87Google Scholar
  • Edmonds J. Matroids and the greedy algorithm. Math. Programming (1971) 1:127–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmonds J., Giles R. A min-max relation for submodular functions on graphs. Ann. Discrete Math. (1974) 1:185–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faigle U., Kern W. Submodular linear programs on forests. Math. Programming (1996) 72:195–206(Original manuscript: Memorandum No. 1163, Faculty of Applied Mathematics, University of Twente, September. 1993.)CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frank A., Tardos É. Generalized polymatroids and submodular flows. Math. Programming (1988) 42:489–563CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frieze A. M., Yadegar J. An algorithm for solving 3-dimensional assignment problems with applications to scheduling a teaching practice. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1981) 32:989–995CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fujishige S.Submodular Functions and Optimization (1991) (North-Holland, Amsterdam) Google Scholar
  • Fujishige S., Tomizawa N. A note on submodular functions on distributive lattices. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Japan (1983) 26:309–318Google Scholar
  • Gilmore P. C., Lawler E. L., Shmoys D. B., Lawler E. L., et al. Well-solved special cases. The Traveling Salesman Problem (1985) (Wiley, Chichester) Google Scholar
  • Granot F., Veinott A. F. Substitutes, complements and ripples in network flows. Math. Oper. Res. (1985) 10:471–497LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haley K. B. The multi-index problem. Oper. Res. (1962) 11:368–379LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman A. J., Klee V. On simple linear programming problems. Convexity: Proc. Seventh Sympos. in Pure Mathematics (1963) 7Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics(American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI) 317–327Google Scholar
  • Hoffman A. J. A generalization of max-flow min-cut. Math. Programming (1974) 6:352–359CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman A. J., Anderson I. On greedy algorithms that succeed. Surveys in Combinatorics (1985) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) 97–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klawe M. M. Superlinear bounds for matrix searching problems. J. Algorithms (1992) 13:55–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korte B., Lovász L., Schrader R.Greedoids (1991) (Springer, Berlin) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korsnikov A. D. Planar three-index transportation problems with dominating index. Z OR—Zeitschrift für Oper. Res. (1988) 32:29–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larmore L. L., Schieber B. On-line dynamic programming with applications to the prediction of RNA secondary structure. J. Algorithms (1991) 12:490–515CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lovász L., Bachem A., et al. Submodular functions and convexity. Mathematical Programming—The State of The Art (1983) (Springer, Berlin) 235–257CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monge G. Mémoire sur la théorie des déblais et remblais. Mémoires de Mathematiques et de Physique (1781) 666–704Google Scholar
  • Nemhauser G. L., Wolsey L. A.Integer and Combinatorial Optimization (1988) (Wiley, Chichester) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park J. K. A special case of the n-vertex traveling salesman problem that can be solved in O(n) time. Inform. Processing Lett. (1991) 40:247–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pierskalla W. P. The multidimensional assignment problem. Oper. Res. (1968) 16:422–431LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Queyranne M., Spieksma F. C. R. Approximation algorithms for multi-index transportation problems with decomposable costs. Discrete Appl. Math. (1997) 76:239–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Queyranne M., Spieksma F. C. R., Tardella F., Rinaldi G., Wolsey L. A general class of greedily solvable linear programs. Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization (1993) 385–3993, Proc. Third IPCO Conf., CORE, Louvain-la-Neuve, May 1993Google Scholar
  • Rudolf R. (1992) . Personal communicationGoogle Scholar
  • Sankoff D., Kruskal J. B.Time Warps, String Edits, and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison (1983) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Shamir R., Dietrich B. L. Characterization and algorithms for greedily solvable transportation problems. Proc. 1st ACM/SIAM Sympos. on Discrete Algorithms (1990) 358–366Google Scholar
  • Tamir A. The least element property of center location on tree networks with applications to distance and precedence constrained problems. Math. Programming (1993) 62:475–496CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Topkis D. M. Minimizing a submodular function on a lattice. Oper. Res. (1978) 26:305–321LinkGoogle Scholar
  • van der Veen J. A., van Dal R. Solvable cases of the no-wait flow-shop scheduling problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1991) 42:971–980CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Veinott A. F. Representation of general and polyhedral subsemilattices and sublattices of product spaces. Linear Algebra Appl. (1989) 114/115:681–704CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu X. Optimal quantization by matrix searching. J. Algorithms (1991) 12:663–673CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yao F. F. Efficient dynamic programming using quadrangle inequalities. Proc. 12th ACM Sympos. on Theory of Comput. (1980) 429–435CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yemelichev V. A., Kovalev M. M., Kratsov M. K.Polytopes, Graphs and Optimisation (1984) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.