Ill-Conditioned Convex Processes and Conic Linear Systems

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.24.4.829

References

  • Borwein J. M. Adjoint process duality. Math. Oper. Res. (1983) 8:403–434LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Borwein J. M. Norm duality for convex processes and applications. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (1986) 48:53–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freund R. M., Vera J. R. Some characterizations and properties of the “distance to ill-posedness” and the condition number of a conic linear system. (1998) . Technical report 3862-95-MSA, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Nunez M. A., Freund R. M. Condition measures and properties of the central trajectory of a linear program. Math. Programming (1998) 83:1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peña J. Understanding the geometry of infeasible perturbations of a conic linear system. SIAM J. Optim. (1998) . Technical report, Cornell University, ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Renegar J. Incorporating condition measures into the complexity theory of linear programming. SIAM J. Optim. (1995a) 5:506–524CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Renegar J. Linear programming, complexity theory and elementary functional analysis. Math. Programming (1995b) 70:279–351CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Renegar J. Condition numbers, the barrier method and the conjugate gradient method. SIAM J. Optim. (1996) 6:879–912CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson S. M. Normed convex processes. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. (1972) 174:127–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson S. M. Regularity and stability for convex multivalued functions. Math. Oper. Res. (1976) 1:130–143LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rockafellar R. T.Convex Analysis (1970) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ursescu C. Multifunctions with convex closed graph. Czech. Math. J. (1975) 7:438–441Google Scholar
  • Vera J. R. Ill-posedness and the complexity of deciding existence of solutions to linear programs. SIAM J. Optim. (1996) 6:549–569CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vera J. R. On the complexity of linear programming under finite precision arithmetic. Math. Programming (1998) 80:91–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.