An Inexact Hybrid Generalized Proximal Point Algorithm and Some New Results on the Theory of Bregman Functions

References

  • Bauschke H. H., Borwein J. M. Legendre functions and the method of random Bregman projections. J. Convex Anal. (1997) 4:27–67Google Scholar
  • Bregman L. M. The relaxation method of finding the common points of convex sets and its application to the solution of problems in convex programming. USSR Comput. Math. and Math. Phys. (1967) 7(3):200–217CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brézis H., Lions P. L. Produits infinis de résolvantes. Israel J. Math. (1978) 29:329–345CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bruck R. E. An iterative solution of a variational inequality for certain monotone operators in a Hilbert space. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (1975) 81:890–892CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bruck R. E. Corrigendum to [4]. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (1976) 82:353Google Scholar
  • Burachik R. S., Iusem A. N. A generalized proximal point algorithm for the variational inequality problem in a Hilbert space. SIAM J. Optim. (1998) 8:197–216CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burachik R. S., Iusem A. N., Svaiter B. F. Enlargement of monotone operators with applications to variational inequalities. Set-Valued Anal. (1997) 5:159–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burke J. V., Qian M. A variable metric proximal point algorithm for monotone operators. SIAM J. Control Optim. (1998) 37:353–375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Censor Y., Iusem A. N., Zenios S. A. An interior point method with Bregman functions for the variational inequality problem with paramonotone operators. Math. Programming (1998) 81:373–400CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Censor Y., Zenios S. The proximal minimization algorithm with D-functions. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (1992) 73:451–464CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen G., Teboulle M. Convergence analysis of proximal-like optimization algorithm using Bregman functions. SIAM J. Optim. (1993) 3:538–543CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cottle R. W., Giannessi F., Lions J.-L.Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems: Theory and Applications (1980) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Eckstein J. Nonlinear proximal point algorithms using Bregman functions, with applications to convex programming. Math. Oper. Res. (1993) 18:202–226LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eckstein J. Approximate iterations in Bregman-function-based proximal algorithms. Math. Programming (1998) 83:113–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eckstein J., Bertsekas D. P. On the Douglas-Rachford splitting method and the proximal point algorithm for maximal monotone operators. Mathe. Programming (1992) 55:293–318CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eggermont P. P. B. Multiplicative iterative algorithms for convex programming. Linear Algebra Appl. (1990) 130:25–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferris M. C. Finite termination of the proximal point algorithm. Math. Programming (1991) 50:359–366CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Güler O. New proximal point algorithms for convex minimization. SIAM J. Optim. (1992) 2:649–664CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iusem A. N. On some properties of generalized proximal point methods for quadratic and linear programming. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (1995) 85:596–612CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iusem A. N. On some properties of generalized proximal point methods for the variational inequality problem. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (1998a) 96:337–362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iusem A. N. On some properties of paramonotone operators. J. Convex Anal. (1998b) 5:269–278Google Scholar
  • Iusem A. N., Solodov M. V. Newton-type methods with generalized distances for constrained optimization. Optim. (1997) 41:257–278CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiwiel K. C. Proximal minimization methods with generalized Bregman functions. SIAM J. Control Optim. (1997) 35:1142–1168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lemaire B., Penot J. P. The proximal algorithm. New Methods of Optimization and Their Industrial Use (1989) 87(Birkhauser, Basel, Switzerland) 73–87International Series of Numerical MathematicsGoogle Scholar
  • Luque F. J. Asymptotic convergence analysis of the proximal point algorithm. SIAM J. Control Optim. (1984) 22:277–293CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martinet B. Regularisation d'inequations variationelles par approximations successives. Rev. Française Inform. Rech. Opér. (1970) 4:154–159Google Scholar
  • Moreau J.-J. Proximité et dualité dans un espace Hilbertien. Bull. Soc. Math. France (1965) 93:273–299CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pang J.-S., Horst R., Pardalos P. Complementarity problems. Handbook of Global Optimization (1995) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) 271–338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Passty G. B. Weak convergence theorems for nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. (1979) 67:274–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rockafellar R. T. Local boundedness of nonlinear monotone operators. Michigan Math. J. (1969) 16:397–407CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rockafellar R. T. On the maximality of sums of nonlinear monotone operators. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. (1970a) 149:75–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rockafellar R. T.Convex Analysis (1970b) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rockafellar R. T. Augmented Lagrangians and applications of the proximal point algorithm in convex programming. Math. Oper. Res. (1976a) 1:97–116LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rockafellar R. T. Monotone operators and the proximal point algorithm. SIAM J. Control Optim. (1976b) 14:877–898CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Solodov M. V., Svaiter B. F. A truly globally convergent Newton-type method for the monotone nonlinear complementarity problem. SIAM J. Optim. (2000a) 10:605–625CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Solodov M. V., Svaiter B. F., Di Pillo G., Giannessi F. A comparison of rates of convergence of two inexact proximal point algorithms. Nonlinear Optimization and Related Topics (2000b) (Kluwer Academic Publishers). ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Solodov M. V., Svaiter B. F. Forcing strong convergence of proximal point iterations in a Hilbert space. Math. Programming (2000c) 87:189–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Solodov M. V., Svaiter B. F., Fukushima M., Qi L. A globally convergent inexact Newton method for systems of monotone equations. Reformulation—Nonsmooth, Piecewise Smooth, Semismooth and Smoothing Methods (1999a) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 355–369Google Scholar
  • Solodov M. V., Svaiter B. F. A hybrid approximate extragradient—proximal point algorithm using the enlargement of a maximal monotone operator. Set-Valued Anal. (1999c) 7:323–345CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Solodov M. V., Svaiter B. F. A hybrid projection—proximal point algorithm. J. Convex Anal. (1999b) 6(1):59–70Google Scholar
  • Teboulle M. Convergence of proximal-like algorithms. SIAM J. Optim. (1997) 7:1069–1083CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.