Conditioning of Convex Programs from a Primal-Dual Perspective

References

  • Epelman M., Freund R. Condition number complexity of an elementary algorithm for computing a reliable solution of a conic linear system. Math. Programming (2000) 88:451–485CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Filipowski S. On the complexity of solving sparse symmetric linear programs specified with approximate data. SIAM J. Optim. (1999) 9:1010–1040CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freund R., Vera J. Some characterization and properties of the “distance to ill-posedness” and the condition measure of a conic linear system. Math. Programming (1999a) 86:225–260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freund R. Condition-based complexity of convex optimization in conic linear form via the ellipsoid algorithm. SIAM J. Optim. (1999b) 10:155–176CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis A. Ill-conditioned convex processes and linear inequalities. Math. Oper. Res. (1999) 4:829–834LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nunez M., Freund R. Condition measures and properties of the central trajectory of a linear program. Math. Programming (1998) 83:1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nesterov Y., Nemirovskii A.Interior-Point Polynomial Algorithms in Convex Programming (1994) (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nesterov Y., Todd M. J. Self-scaled barriers and interior-point methods for convex programming. Math. Oper. Res. (1997) 22:1–42LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nesterov Y. Primal-dual interior-point methods for self-scaled cones. SIAM J. Optim. (1998) 8:324–364CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peña J. Understanding the geometry on infeasible perturbations of a conic linear system. SIAM J. Optim. (2000) 10:534–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peña J., Renegar J. Computing approximate solutions for conic systems of constraints. Math. Programming (2000) 87:351–383CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Renegar J. Some perturbation theory for linear programming. Math. Programming (1994) 65:73–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Renegar J. Incorporating condition measures into the complexity theory of linear programming. SIAM J. Optim. (1995a) 5:506–524CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Renegar J. Linear programming, complexity theory and elementary functional analysis. Math. Programming (1995b) 70:279–351CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Renegar J. Condition numbers, the barrier method and the conjugate gradient method. SIAM J. Optim. (1996) 6(1996):879–912CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Renegar J.A Mathematical View of Interior-Point Methods in Convex Optimization (2000) (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA) Google Scholar
  • Stewart G., Sun J.Matrix Perturbation Theory (1990) (Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA) Google Scholar
  • Vera J. Ill-posedness and the complexity of deciding existence of solutions to linear programs. SIAM J. Optim. (1996) 6:549–569CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vera J. On the complexity of linear programming under finite precision arithmetic. Math. Programming (1998) 80:91–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.