The Bilateral Consistent Prekernel, the Core, and NTU Bankruptcy Problems

References

  • Asscher N. An ordinal bargaining set for games without side payments. Math. Oper. Res. (1976) 4:381–389LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aumann R. J. On the non-transferable utility value: A comment on the Roth-Shafer examples. Econometrica (1985) 53:667–677CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aumann R. J., Maschler M. Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the talmud. J. Econom. Theory (1985) 36:195–213CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Border K. C.Fixed Point Theorems with Applications to Economics and Game Theory (1985) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chun Y., Thomson W. Bargaining problems with claims. Math. Soc. Sci. (1992) 24:19–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dagan N., Volij O. The bankruptcy problem: A cooperative bargaining approach. Math. Soc. Sci. (1993) 26:287–297CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis M., Maschler M. The kernel of a cooperative game. Naval Res. Log. Quart. (1965) 12:223–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart S., Mas-Colell A. Bargaining and value. Econometrica (1996) 64:357–380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalai E. Excess functions for cooperative games without sidepayments. SIAM J. Appl. Math. (1975) 29:60–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lensberg T. Stability and the nash solution. J. Econom. Theory (1988) 45:330–341CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maschler M., Owen G. The consistent Shapley value for hyperplane games. Internat. J. Game Theory (1989) 18:389–407CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maschler M., Peleg B. A characterization existence proof and dimension bounds for the kernel of a game. Pacific J. Math. (1966) 18:289–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maschler M., Owen G., Selten R. The consistent Shapley value for games without side payments. Rational Interaction (1992) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maschler M., Owen G., Peleg B., Roth A. Paths leading to the Nash set. The Shapley Value: Essays in Honour of L. S. Shapley (1988) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Maschler M., Owen G., Shapley L. S. The kernel and bargaining set for convex games. Internat. J. Game Theory (1972) 1:73–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nash J. F. The bargaining problem. Econometrica (1950) 18:155–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orshan G., Zarzuelo J. M. The bilateral consistent prekernel for NTU games. Games Econom. Behavior (2000) 32:67–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peleg B. An axiomatization of the core of cooperative games without side payments. J. Math. Econom. (1985) 14:203–214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peleg B. On the reduced game property and its converse. Internat. J. Game Theory (1986a) 15:187–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peleg B. A proof that the core of an ordinal convex game is a Von Neumann-Morgenstern solution. Math. Soc. Sci. (1986b) 11:83–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth A. Values for games without side payments. Econometrica (1980) 48:457–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scarf H. The core of an N person game. Econometrica (1967) 35:50–69CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmeidler D. The nucleolus of a characteristic function game. SIAM J. Appl. Math. (1969) 17:1163–1170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Serrano R. Reinterpreting the kernel. J. Econom. Theory (1997) 77:58–80CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Serrano R. Beyond Nash bargaining theory: The Nash set. J. Econom. Theory (1998) 83:286–307CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Serrano R. A comparison of the average prekernel and the prekernel. (2001) . Working paper 2001-30 Department of Economics, Brown University, Providence, RIGoogle Scholar
  • Shafer W. On the existence and interpretation of value allocations. Econometrica (1980) 48:467–477CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapley L. S., Hu T. C., Robinson S. M. On balanced games without side payments. Mathematical Programming (1973) (Academic Press, New York) 261–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sobolev A. I. The characterization of optimality principles in cooperative games by functional equations. Math. Methods in the Soc. Sci. (1975) 6:94–151(In Russian); N. N. Vorobev ed., Vilnius, LithuaniaGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.