Integer Programming and Arrovian Social Welfare Functions

References

  • Arrow K. J.Social Choice and Individual Values (1963) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dutta B., Jackson M., Le Breton M. Strategic candidacy and voting procedures. Econometrica (2001) 69:1013–1038CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ehlers L., Storcken T. Arrow's Theorem in spatial environments. (2001) Google Scholar
  • Gibbard A. Manipulation of voting schemes: A general result. Econometrica (1973) 41:587–602CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalai E., Muller E. Characterization of domains admitting nondictatorial social welfare functions and nonmanipulable voting procedures. J. Econom. Theory (1977) 16(2):457–469CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Le Breton M., Weymark J., Schofield Norman. An introduction to Arrovian Social Welfare Functions on economic and political domains. Collective Decision Making: Social Choice and Political Economy (1996) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Maskin E., Basu K., Pattanaik P. K., Suzumura K. Majority rule, social welfare functions, and game forms. Choice, Welfare and Development (1995) (Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • May K. O. A set of independent necessary and sufficient conditions for simple majority decision. Econometrica (1952) 20:680–684CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moulin H. Generalized condorcet winners for single peaked and single plateau preferences. Soc. Choice Welfare (1984) 1:127–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muller E. Graphs and anonymous social welfare functions. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1982) 23:609–622CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muller E., Satterthwaite M. The equivalence of strong positive association and strategy-proofness. J. Econom. Theory (1977) 14:412–418CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Satterthwaite M. Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions. J. Econom. Theory (1975) 10:187–217CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sen A. A possibility theorem on majority decisions. Econometrica (1966) 34(2):491–499CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sethuraman J., Teo C. P., Vohra R. Integer programming and Arrovian Social Welfare Functions. (2001) . Discussion paper 1316, The Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Teo C. P., Sethuraman J. Geometry of fractional stable matchings and its applications. Math. Oper. Res. (1998) 23(4):874–891LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson R. B. Social choice theory without the Pareto principle. J. Econom. Theory (1972) 5:478–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.