Optimal Replacement Under Partial Observations

References

  • Anderson R. F. Discounted replacement, maintenance, and repair problems in reliability. Math. Oper. Res. (1994) 19:909–945LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Astrom K. J. Optimal control of Markov processes with incomplete state information. J. Math. Anal. Appl. (1965) 10:174–205CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Astrom K. J. Optimal control of Markov processes with incomplete state-information. II. The convexity of the loss function. J. Math. Anal. Appl. (1969) 26:403–406CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aven T. Condition based replacement policies—A counting process approach. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (1996) 51:275–281CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aven T., Bergman B. Optimal replacement times—A general set-up. J. Appl. Probab. (1986) 23:432–442CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banjevic D., Jardine A. K. S., Makis V., Ennis M. A control-limit policy and software for condition-based maintenance optimization. INFOR (2001) 39:32–50Google Scholar
  • Bergman B. Optimal replacement under a general failure model. Adv. Appl. Probab. (1978) 10:431–451CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsekas D. P., Shreve S. E.Stochastic Optimal Control: The Discrete Time Case (1978) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Brémaud P.Point Processes and Queues: Martingale Dynamics (1981) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burago D., Rougemont M., Slissenko A. On the complexity of partially observed Markov decision processes. Theoret. Comput. Sci. (1996) 157:161–183CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox D. R., Oakes D.Analysis of Survival Data (1984) (Chapman & Hall, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Davis M. H. A.Markov Models and Optimization (1993) (Chapman & Hall, London, U.K.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elliott R. J.Stochastic Calculus and Applications (1982) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
  • Fernandez-Gaucherand E., Arapostathis A., Marcus S. I. On the average cost optimality equation and the structure of optimal policies for partially observable Markov decision processes. Ann. Oper. Res. (1991) 29:439–470CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauskrecht M. Value-function approximations for partially observable Markov decision processes. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. (2000) 13:33–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hernandez-Lerma O.Adaptive Markov Control Processes (1989) (Springer-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jazwinski A. H.Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory (1970) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Jensen U. Optimal replacement with nonmonotone failure rates. OR Spektrum (1984) 6:53–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen U. Monotone stopping rules for stochastic processes in a semimartingale representation with applications. Optim (1989) 20:837–852CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen U., Hsu G-H. Optimal stopping by means of point process observations with applications in reliability. Math. Oper. Res. (1993) 18:645–657LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lototsky S. V., Rozovskii B. L. Recursive nonlinear filter for a continuous discrete-time model: Separation of parameters and observations. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control (1998) 43:1154–1158CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lovejoy W. S. A survey of algorithmic methods for partially observed Markov decision processes. Ann. Oper. Res. (1991) 28:47–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Makis V., Jardine A. K. S. Optimal replacement in the proportional hazards model. INFOR (1992) 30:172–183Google Scholar
  • Makis V., Jardine A. K. S. A condition-based maintenance model. IMA J. Math. Appl. Bus. Indus. (1998) 9:201–210Google Scholar
  • Makis V., Jardine A. K. S., Cheng K. Optimal preventive replacement under minimal repair and random repair cost. Math. Oper. Res. (2000) 25:141–156LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mandl P. Estimation and control in Markov chains. Adv. Appl. Probab. (1974) 6:40–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monahan G. E. A survey of partially observable Markov decision processes: Theory, models, and algorithms. Management Sci. (1982) 28:1–16LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nummelin E. A general failure model: Optimal replacement with state dependent replacement and failure costs. Math. Oper. Res. (1980) 5:381–387LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ross S. M. Quality control under Markovian deterioration. Management Sci. (1971) 17:587–596LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sawaki K., Ichikawa A. Optimal control for partially observable Markov decision processes over an infinite horizon. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Japan (1978) 21:1–15Google Scholar
  • Smallwood R. D., Sondik E. J. The optimal control of partially observable Markov processes over a finite horizon. Oper. Res. (1973) 21:1071–1088LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sondik E. J. The optimal control of partially observable Markov processes over the infinite horizon: Discounted costs. Oper. Res. (1978) 26:282–304LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stadje W. Maximal wearing-out of a deteriorating system: An optimal stopping approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1994) 73:472–479CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Schuppen J. Filtering, prediction and smoothing observations: A Martingale approach. SIAM J. Appl. Math. (1977) 32:552–570CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White C. C. A Markov quality control process subject to partial observation. Management Sci. (1977) 23:843–852LinkGoogle Scholar
  • White C. C. Optimal control-limit strategies for a partially observed replacement problem. Internat. J. Systems Sci. (1979) 10:321–331CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White C. C. A survey of solution techniques for the partially observed Markov decision process. Ann. Oper. Res. (1991) 32:215–230CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White C. C., Harrington D. P. Application of Jensen's inequality to adaptive suboptimal design. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (1980) 32:89–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.