Preference Foundations for Nonexpected Utility: A Generalized and Simplified Technique

References

  • Abdellaoui Mohammed. Parameter-free elicitation of utilities and probability weighting functions. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1497–1512LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abdellaoui Mohammed. A genuine rank-dependent generalization of the von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility theorem. Econometrica (2002) 70:717–736CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abdellaoui Mohammed, Munier Bertrand R., Machina Mark J., Munier Bertrand J. How consistent are probability tradeoffs in individual preferences under risk? Some preliminary results. Beliefs, Interactions, and Preferences in Decision-Making (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anscombe F. J., Aumann Robert J. A definition of subjective probability. Ann. Math. Statist. (1963) 34:199–205CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bewley Truman F. Knightian decision theory part I.. (1986) . Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 807Google Scholar
  • de Blaeij Arianne T., van Vuuren Daniel J. Risk perception of traffic participants. Accident Anal. and Prevention (2003) 35:167–175CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bleichrodt Han, Miyamoto John. A characterization of quality-adjusted life-years under cumulative prospect theory. Math. Oper. Res. (2003) 28:181–193LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bleichrodt Han, Pinto Jose Luis. A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision making. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1485–1496LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bleichrodt Han, Pinto Jose Luis. The validity of QALYs under nonexpected utility. (2001) . iMTA, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  • Bleichrodt Han, Pinto Jose Luis, Wakker Peter P. Making descriptive use of prospect theory to improve the prescriptive use of expected utility. Management Sci. (2001) 47:1498–1514LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bleichrodt Han, Quiggin John. Characterizing QALYs under a general rank dependent utility model. J. Risk and Uncertainty (1997) 15:151–165CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bleichrodt Han, Quiggin John. Life-cycle preferences over consumption and health: When is cost-effectiveness analysis equivalent to cost-benefit analysis? J. Health Econom. (1999) 18:681–708CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casadesus-Masanell Ramon, Kilabanoff Peter, Ozdenoren Emre. Maxmin expected utility over savage acts with a set of priors. J. Econom. Theory (2000) 92:35–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chateauneuf Alain. On the use of capacities in modeling uncertainty aversion and risk aversion. J. Math. Econom. (1991) 20:343–369CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chateauneuf Alain. Comonotonicity axioms and rank-dependent expected utility theory for arbitrary consequences. J. Math. Econom. (1999) 32:21–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chateauneuf Alain, Wakker Peter P. An axiomatization of cumulative prospect theory for decision under risk. J. Risk and Uncertainty (1999) 18:137–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chew Soo Hong. The rank-dependent quasilinear mean. (1989) . Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Irvine, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Chew Soo Hong, Karni Edi. Choquet expected utility with a finite state space: Commutativity and act-independence. J. Econom. Theory (1994) 62:469–479CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chew Soo Hong, Tversky Amos. Cumulative pospect theory: Reference-dependent axiomatization of decision under uncertainty. (1990) . Working paper, Department of Psychology, Stanford University. Presented by Tversky at the 5th Foundations of Utility and Risk (FUR) Conference. Duke University, Durham, NC, 1990Google Scholar
  • Ebert Udo. Social welfare, inequality, and poverty when needs differ: Rank-dependent evaluation functions. Soc. Choice and Welfare (2003) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Fennema Hein, van Assen Marcel A. L. M. Measuring the utility of losses by means of the tradeoff method. J. Risk and Uncertainty (1998) 17:277–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Finetti Bruno. La prévision: Ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré (1937) 7:1–68Google Scholar
  • Fishburn Peter C.The Foundations of Expected Utility (1982) (Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghirardato Paolo, Maccheroni Fabio, Marinacci Massimo, Siniscalchi Marciano. A subjective spin on roulette wheels. (2002) . Economic Department, University of Torino, Torino, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  • Ghirardato Paolo, Marinacci Massimo. Risk, ambiguity, and the separation of utility and beliefs. Math. Oper. Res. (2001) 26:864–890LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ghirardato Paolo, Marinacci Massimo. Ambiguity made precise: A comparative foundation. J. Econom. Theory (2002) 102:251–289CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilboa Itzhak. Expected utility with purely subjective nonadditive probabilities. J. Math. Econom. (1987) 16:65–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilboa Itzhak, Schmeidler David. Maxmin expected utility with a nonunique prior. J. Math. Econom. (1989) 18:141–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilboa Itzhak, Schmeidler David, Wakker Peter P. Utility in case-based decision theory. J. Econom. Theory (2002) 105:483–502CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gul Faruk. Savage's theorem with a finite number of states. J. Econom. Theory (1992) 57:99–110(Erratum. J. Econom. Theory61 1993, 184.)CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman Daniel, Tversky Amos. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47:263–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karni Edi. On the representation of beliefs by probabilities. J. Risk and Uncertainty (2003) 26:17–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Köbberling Veronika, Wakker Peter P. A simple tool for qualitatively testing, quantitatively measuring, and normatively justifying Savage's subjective expected utility. J. Risk and Uncertainty (2001) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Krantz David H., Duncan Luce R., Suppes Patrick, Tversky Amos. Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I, Additive and Polynomial Representations (1971) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • LeRoy Stephen F., Werner Jan. Principles of Financial Economics (2000) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luce R. Duncan. Rank-dependent, subjective expected-utility representations. J. Risk and Uncertainty (1988) 1:305–332CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luce R. Duncan. Utility of Gains and Losses: Measurement-Theoretical and Experimental Approaches (2000) (Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, London) Google Scholar
  • Luce R. Duncan, Krantz David H., Suppes Patric, Tversky Amos. Foundations of Measurement, Vol. III, Representation, Axiomatization, and Invariance (1990) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Mendelson Bert. Introduction to Topology (1962) (Dover, New York) . (3rd ed., 1990)Google Scholar
  • Miyamoto John M. Generic utility theory: Measurement foundations and applications in multiattribute utility theory. J. Math. Psych. (1988) 32:357–404CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miyamoto John M. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) utility models under expected utility and rank dependent utility assumptions. J. Math. Psych. (1999) 43:201–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Münnich Ákos, Maksa Gyula, Mokken Robert J. n-variable bisection. J. Math. Psych. (2000) 44:569–581CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nakamura Yutaka. Subjective expected utility with non-additive probabilities on finite state spaces. J. Econom. Theory (1990) 51:346–366CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nakamura Yutaka. Multi-symmetric structures and non-expected utility. J. Math. Psych. (1992) 36:375–395CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nakamura Yutaka. Rank dependent utility for arbitrary consequence spaces. Math. Social Sci. (1995) 29:103–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narens Louis. Abstract Measurement Theory (1985) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • von Neumann John, Morgenstern Oskar. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1944, 1947, 1953) (Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ) Google Scholar
  • Pfanzagl Johann. A general theory of measurement—applications to utility. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. (1959) 6:283–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfanzagl Johann. Theory of Measurement (1968) (Physica-Verlag, Vienna) Google Scholar
  • Prelec Drazen. The probability weighting function. Econometrica (1998) 66:497–527CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quiggin John. A theory of anticipated utility. J. Econom. Behaviour and Organization (1982) 3:323–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarin Rakesh K., Wakker Peter P. A simple axiomatization of nonadditive expected utility. Econometrica (1992) 60:1255–1272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Savage Leonard J.The Foundations of Statistics (1954) (Wiley, New York) . (2nd ed. 1972, Dover, New York)Google Scholar
  • Schmeidler David. Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica (1989) 57:571–587CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmidt Ulrich. Reference-dependence in cumulative prospect theory. J. Math. Psych. (2003) 47:122–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmidt Ulrich, Zank Horst. A new axiomatization of rank-dependent expected utility with tradeoff consistency for equally likely outcomes. J. Math. Econom. (2001a) 35:483–491CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmidt Ulrich, Zank Horst. An axiomatization of linear cumulative prospect theory with applications to portfolio selection and insurance demand. (2001b) . School of Economic Studies, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, UKGoogle Scholar
  • Segal Uzi. Anticipated utility: A measure representation approach. Ann. Oper. Res. (1989) 19:359–373CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Segal Uzi. The measure representation: A correction. J. Risk and Uncertainty (1993a) 6:99–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Segal Uzi. Order indifference and rank-dependent probabilities. J. Math. Econom. (1993b) 22:373–397CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Šipoš Ján. Integral with respect to a pre-measure. Math. Slovaca (1979) 29:141–155Google Scholar
  • Skiadas Costis. Subjective probability under additive aggregation of conditional preferences. J. Econom. Theory (1997) 76:242–271CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky Amos. Features of similarity. Psych. Rev. (1977) 84:327–352CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky Amos, Kahneman Daniel. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference dependent model. Quart. J. Econom. (1991) 106:1039–1061CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky Amos, Kahneman Daniel. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk and Uncertainty (1992) 5:297–323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky Amos, Sattath Shmuel, Slovic Paul. Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psych. Rev. (1988) 95:371–384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vind Karl. Independent preferences. J. Math. Econom. (1991) 20:119–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wakker Peter P. Cardinal coordinate independence for expected utility. J. Math. Psych. (1984) 28:110–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wakker Peter P. The algebraic versus the topological approach to additive representations. J. Math. Psych. (1988) 32:421–435CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wakker Peter P.Additive Representations of Preferences, A New Foundation of Decision Analysis (1989) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wakker Peter P. Under stochastic dominance Choquet-expected utility and anticipated utility are identical. Theory and Decision (1990) 29:119–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wakker Peter P. Additive representation for equally spaced structures. J. Math. Psych. (1991a) 35:260–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wakker Peter P. Additive representations on rank-ordered sets. I. The algebraic approach. J. Math. Psych. (1991b) 35:501–531CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wakker Peter P., Doignon Jean-Paul, Falmagne Jean-Claude. Additive representations of preferences, a new foundation of decision analysis; The algebraic approach. Mathematical Psychology: Current Developments (1991c) (Springer, Berlin) 71–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wakker Peter P. Additive representations on rank-ordered sets II. The topological approach. J. Math. Econom. (1993a) 22:1–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wakker Peter P. Unbounded utility for Savage's “Foundations of Statistics,” and other Models. Math. Oper. Res. (1993b) 18:446–485LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wakker Peter P. Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion. Theory and Decision (1994) 36:1–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wakker Peter P., Deneffe Daniel. Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities when probabilities are distorted or unknown. Management Sci. (1996) 42:1131–1150LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wakker Peter P., Tversky Amos. An axiomatization of cumulative prospect theory. J. Risk and Uncertainty (1993) 7:147–176CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wakker Peter P., Zank Horst. A unified derivation of classical subjective expected utility models through cardinal utility. J. Math. Econom. (1999) 32:1–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weymark John A. Generalized Gini inequality indices. Math. Social Sci. (1981) 1:409–430CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yaari Menahem E. The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica (1987) 55:95–115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.