A Comparison of the Sherali-Adams, Lovász-Schrijver, and Lasserre Relaxations for 0–1 Programming

References

  • Anjos M. F., Wolkowicz H. Strengthened semidefinite relaxations via a second lifting for the max-cut problem. Discrete Appl. Math. (2002) 119:79–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balas E., Ceria S., Cornuéjols G. A lift-and-project cutting plane algorithm for mixed 0–1 programs. Math. Programming (1993) 58:295–324CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barahona F., Mahjoub A. R. On the cut polytope. Math. Programming (1986) 36:157–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berg C., Christensen J. P. R., Jensen C. U. A remark on the multidimensional moment problem. Math. Ann. (1979) 243:163–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berg C., Christensen J. P. R., Ressel P.Harmonic Analysis and Semigroups—Theory of Positive Definite and Related Functions (1984) (Springer-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chvátal V. Edmonds polytopes and a hierarchy of combinatorial problems. Discrete Math. (1973) 4:305–337CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chvátal V., Cook W., Hartman M. On cutting-plane proofs in combinatorial optimization. Linear Algebra Appl. (1989) 114/115:455–499CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook W., Dash S. On the matrix-cut rank of polyhedra. Math. Oper. Res. (2001) 26:19–30LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cornuéjols G., Li Y., Aardal K., Gerards A. M. H. On the rank of mixed 0–1 polyhedra. Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization 2001 (2001) 71–77Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 2081CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Curto R. E., Fialkow L. A. The truncated complex K-moment problem. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. (2000) 352:2825–2855CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Klerk E., Pasechnik D. V. Approximating the stability number of a graph via copositive programming. SIAM J. Optim. (2002) 12:875–892CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenbrand F. On the membership problem for the elementary closure of a polyhedron. Combinatorica (2000) 19:299–300Google Scholar
  • Eisenbrand F., Schulz A. S., Cornuéjols G., Burkard G., Woeginger R. E. J. Bounds on the Chvátal rank of polytopes in the 0/1 cube. Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization 1999 (1999) 137–150Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 1610CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fuglede B. The multidimensional moment problem. Expositiones Math. (1983) 1:47–65Google Scholar
  • Fujie T., Kojima M. Semidefinite programming relaxation for nonconvex quadratic programs. J. Global Optim. (1997) 10:367–380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goemans M. X., Tunçel L. When does the positive semidefiniteness constraint help in lifting procedures. Math. Oper. Res. (2001) 26:796–815LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goemans M. X., Williamson D. P. Improved approximation algorithms for maximum cuts and satisfiability problems using semidefinite programming. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. (1995) 42:1115–1145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grötschel M., Lovász L., Schrijver A.Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization (1988) (Springer Verlag, Berlin, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Handelman D. Representing polynomials by positive linear functions on compact convex polyhedra. Pacific J. Math. (1988) 132:35–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haviland E. K. On the momentum problem for distributions in more than one dimension. I, II. Amer. J. Math. (1935) 57:562–568CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haviland E. K. On the momentum problem for distributions in more than one dimension. I, II. Amer. J. Math. (1936) 58:164–168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lasserre J. B. Optimality conditions and LMI relaxations for 0–1 programs. (2000) . Technical report no. 00099, CNRS-LAAS, Toulouse, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Lasserre J. B. Global optimization with polynomials and the problem of moments. SIAM J. Optim. (2001a) 11:796–817CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lasserre J. B., Aardal K., Gerards A. M. H. An explicit exact SDP relaxation for nonlinear 0–1 programs. Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization 2001 (2001b) 293–303Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 2081CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lasserre J. B. Semidefinite programming vs. LP relaxations for polynomial programming. Math. Oper. Res. (2002) 27:347–360LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Laurent M. Tighter linear and semidefinite relaxations for max-cut based on the Lovász-Schrijver lift-and-project procedure. SIAM J. Optim. (2001) 12:345–375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laurent M., Grötschel M. Semidefinite relaxations for max-cut. The Sharpest Cut: Festschrift in Honor of M. Padberg's 60th Birthday (2003) (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA) 291–327Google Scholar
  • Lovász L. On the Shannon capacity of a graph. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory (1979) IT-25:1–7CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lovász L., Schrijver A. Cones of matrices and set-functions and 0–1 optimization. SIAM J. Optim. (1991) 1:166–190CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nesterov Y., Frenk J. B. G., Roos C., Terlaky T., Zhang S. Squared functional systems and optimization problems. High Performance Optimization (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Utrecht, The Netherlands) 405–440CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parrilo P. A. Structured semidefinite programs and semialgebraic geometry methods in robustness and optimization. (2000) . Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Putinar M. Positive polynomials on compact semialgebraic sets. Indiana Univ. Math. J. (1993) 42:969–984CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reznick B. Some concrete aspects of Hilbert's 17th problem. (1998) . Report 98-002, Department of Mathematics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Schmüdgen K. The K-moment problem for compact semialgebraic sets. Math. Ann. (1991) 289:203–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H. D., Adams W. P. A hierarchy of relaxations between the continuous and convex hull representations for zero-one programming problems. SIAM J. Discrete Math. (1990) 3:411–430CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H. D., Adams W. P. A hierarchy of relaxations and convex hull characterizations for mixed-integer zero-one programming problems. Discrete Appl. Math. (1994) 52:83–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H. D., Adams W. P.A Reformulation-Linearization Technique for Solving Discrete and Continuous Nonconvex Problems (1999) (Kluwer, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H. D., Adams W. P., Driscoll P. J. Exploiting special structures in constructing a hierarchy of relaxations for 0–1 mixed integer problems. Oper. Res. (1998) 46:396–405LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H. D., Tuncbilek C. H. A global optimization algorithm for polynomial programming problems using a Reformulation-Linearization Technique. J. Global Optim. (1992) 2:101–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H. D., Tuncbilek C. H. Reformulation-linearization/convexification relaxations for univariate and multivariate polynomial programming problems. Oper. Res. Lett. (1997) 21:1–10CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shor N. Z. An approach to obtaining global extremums in polynomial mathematical programming problems. Kibernetika (1987) 5:102–106Google Scholar
  • Shor N. Z.Nondifferentiable Optimization and Polynomial Problems (1998) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stephen T., Tunçel L. On a representation of the matching polytope via semidefinite liftings. Math. Oper. Res. (1999) 24:1–7LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wilf H. S. Hadamard determinants, Möbius functions, and the chromatic number of a graph. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (1968) 74:960–964CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.