Lower Bound for the Number of Iterations in Semidefinite Hierarchies for the Cut Polytope

References

  • Balas E., Ceria S., Cornuéjols G. A lift-and-project cutting plane algorithm for mixed 0–1 programs. Math. Programming (1993) 58:295–324CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bannai I., Ito T.Algebraic Combinatorics I. Association Schemes (1984) (Benjamin/Cummings, London, U.K., Tokyo, Japan) Google Scholar
  • Cook W., Dash S. On the matrix-cut rank of polyhedra. Math. Oper. Res. (2001) 26:19–30LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Curto R. E., Fialkow L. A. The truncated complex K-moment problem. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. (2000) 352:2825–2855CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dash S. On the matrix cuts of Lovász and Schrijver and their use in integer programming. (2000) . Ph.D. thesis, Rice University, Houston, TXGoogle Scholar
  • Deza M. M., Laurent M.Geometry of Cuts and Metrics (1997) (Springer Verlag, Berlin) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goemans M. X., Tunçel L. When does the positive semidefiniteness constraint help in lifting procedures? Math. Oper. Res. (2001) 26:796–815LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grigoriev D. Complexity of positivstellensatz proofs for the knapsack. Comput. Complexity (2001) 10:139–154( http://eccc.uni-trier.de/eccc)CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grigoriev D., Hirsch E. A., Pasechnik D. V. Complexity of semi-algebraic proofs. Electronic Colloquium Comput. Complexity (2001) . Report No. 103Google Scholar
  • Horn R. A., Johnson J. C.Matrix Analysis (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Lasserre J. B. Global optimization with polynomials and the problem of moments. SIAM J. Optim. (2001a) 11:796–817CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lasserre J. B., Aardal K., Gerards A. M. H. An explicit exact SDP relaxation for nonlinear 0–1 programs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 2081 (2001b) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) 293–303CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lasserre J. B. An explicit equivalent positive semidefinite program for nonlinear 0–1 programs. SIAM J. Optim. (2002) 12:756–769CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laurent M. Tighter linear and semidefinite relaxations for max-cut based on the Lovász-Schrijver lift-and-project procedure. SIAM J. Optim. (2001) 12:345–375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laurent M. A comparison of the Sherali-Adams, Lovász-Schrijver and Lasserre relaxations for 0–1 programming. Math. Oper. Res. (2003a) 28:470–496LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Laurent M., Grötschel M. Semidefinite relaxations for Max-Cut. The Sharpest Cut, Festschrift in Honor of M. Padberg's 60th Birthday (2003b) (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA) 291–327MPS-SIAM Series on OptimizationGoogle Scholar
  • Lovász L., Schrijver A. Cones of matrices and set-functions and 0–1 optimization. SIAM J. Optim. (1991) 1:166–190CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nesterov Y., Frenk J. B. G., Roos C., Terlaky T., Zhang S. Squared functional systems and optimization problems. High Performance Optimization (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 405–440CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parrilo P. A. Structured semidefinite programs and semialgebraic geometry methods in robustness and optimization. (2000) . Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Parrilo P. A. Semidefinite programming relaxations for semialgebraic problems. Math. Programming (2003) 96:293–320CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petkovsek M., Wilf H. S., Zeilberger D.A = B (1996) (A. K. Peters, Wellesley, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Putinar M. Positive polynomials on compact semi-algebraic sets. Indiana Univ. Math. J. (1993) 42:969–984CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robertson N., Seymour P. D.Graph minors XX: Wagner's Conjecture (1988) . PreprintGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H. D., Adams W. P. A hierarchy of relaxations between the continuous and convex hull representations for zero-one programming problems. SIAM J. Discrete Math. (1990) 3:411–430CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H. D., Adams W. P.A Reformulation-Linearization Technique for Solving Discrete and Continuous Nonconvex Problems (1999) (Kluwer, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shor N. Z. An approach to obtaining global extremums in polynomial mathematical programming problems. Kibernetika (1987) 5:102–106Google Scholar
  • Stephen T., Tunçel L. On a representation of the matching polytope via semidefinite liftings. Math. Oper. Res. (1999) 24:1–7LinkGoogle Scholar
  • van Lint J. H., Wilson R. M.A Course in Combinatorics (1992) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.