Airline Schedule Planning: Accomplishments and Opportunities

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1030.0018

References

  • Abara J. Applying integer linear programming to the fleet assignment problem. Interfaces (1989) 19(4):20–28LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ageeva Y. Approaches to incorporating robustness into airline scheduling. (2000) (Cambridge, MA). MIT thesisGoogle Scholar
  • Anbil R., Gelman E., Patty B., Tanga R. Recent advances in crew-pairing optimization at American Airlines. Interfaces (1991) 21:62–74LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Armacost A., Barnhart C., Ware K. Composite variable formulations for express shipment service network design. Transportation Sci. (2002) 36(1):1–20LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barnhart C., Farahat A., Lohatepanont M. Airline fleet assignment with enhanced revenue modeling: An alternative model and solution approach. (2002a) . Working paper, Operations Research Center, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Barnhart C., Kniker T., Lohatepanont M. Itinerary-based airline fleet assignment. Transportation Sci. (2002b) 36(2):199–217LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barnhart C., Lu F., Shenoi R., Yu G. Integrated airline scheduling. Operations Research in the Air Industry (1998a) 9:384–403International Series in Operations Research and Management ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnhart C., Johnson E., Anbil R., Hatay L., Ciriano T., Leachman R. A column generation technique for the long-haul crew assignment problem. Optimization in Industry: Vol. II (1994) (Wiley, New York) 7–22Google Scholar
  • Barnhart C., Johnson E., Nemhauser G., Savelsbergh M., Vance P. Branch-and-price: Column generation for solving huge integer programs. Oper. Res. (1998b) 46(3):316–329LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barnhart C., Boland N., Clarke L., Johnson E., Nemhauser G., Shenoi R. Flight string models for aircraft fleeting and routing. Transportation Sci. (1998c) 32(3):208–220LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barnhart C., Cohn A. M., Johnson E. L., Klabjan D., Nemhauser G. L., Vance P. H., Hall Randolph W. Airline crew scheduling. Handbook of Transportation Science (2003) 2nd ed.(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butchers E. R., Day P. R., Goldie A. P., Miller S., Meyer J. A., Ryan D. M., Scott A. C., Wallace C. A. Optimized crew scheduling at Air New Zealand. Interfaces (2001) 31:30–56LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cappanera P., Gallo G. On the airline crew rostering problem. (2001) . Technical Report TR-01-08, Department of Computer Science, University of Pisa, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  • Caprara A., Toth P., Fischetti M., Vigo D. Modeling and solving the crew rostering problem. Oper. Res. (1998) 46:820–830LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Christou I. T., Zakarian A., Liu J., Carter H. A two-phase genetic algorithm for large-scale bidline-generation problems at Delta Air Lines. Interfaces (1999) 29:51–65LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clarke L., Hane C., Johnson E., Nemhauser G. Maintenance and crew considerations in fleet assignment. Transportation Sci. (1996a) 30(3):249–260LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clarke L., Johnson E., Nemhauser G., Zhu Z. The aircraft rotation problem. Ann. Oper. Res. (1996b) 69:33–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clarke M. Development of heuristic procedures for flight rescheduling in the aftermath of irregular operations. (1997) . Working paper, Department of Aeronautical/Astronautical Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Clarke M., Smith B. The impact of operations research on the evolution of the airline industry: A review of the airline planning process. (2000) . Research paper, Sabre Inc., Dallas, TXGoogle Scholar
  • Cohn A., Barnhart C. Composite-variable modeling for service parts logistics. Ann. Oper. Res. (2002) . Submitted toGoogle Scholar
  • Cohn A., Barnhart C. Improving crew scheduling by incorporating key maintenance routing decisions. Oper. Res. (2003) 51:387–396LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cook T. Creating competitive advantage using model-driven support systems. Presentation in the MIT Global Airline Indust. Study Distinguished Speaker Sem. Ser. (2000) Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Cordeau J., Stojkociv G., Soumis F., Desrosiers J. Benders decomposition for simultaneous aircraft routing and crew scheduling. (2000) . Technical Report G-2000-37, GERAD, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Québec, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  • Dawid H., König J., Strauss C. An enhanced rostering model for airline crews. Comput. Oper. Res. (2001) 28:671–688CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Day P. R., Ryan D. M. Flight attendant rostering for short-haul airline operations. Oper. Res. (1997) 45:649–661LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Desaulniers G., Desrosiers J., Gamache M., Soumis F., Crainic T., Laporte G. Crew scheduling in air transportation. Fleet Management and Logistics (1998) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) 169–185CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desrochers M., Soumis F. A generalized permanent labeling algorithm for the shortest path problem with time windows. INFOR (1988) 26:191–212Google Scholar
  • Desrochers M., Soumis F. A column generation approach to the urban transit crew scheduling problem. Transportation Sci. (1989) 23:1–13LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Desrosiers J., Dumas Y., Solomon M. M., Soumis F. Time constrained routing and scheduling. Vehicle Routing (1995) (North-Holland, Amsterdam) Google Scholar
  • Desrosiers J., Dumas Y., Desrochers M., Soumis F., Sanso B., Trudeau P. A breakthrough in airline crew scheduling. (1991) . Report G-91-11, GERAD, Montréal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  • Erdmann A., Noltemeier A., Schrader R. Modeling and solving the airline schedule generation problem. (1999) . Technical Report zpr99-351, ZAIK, University of Cologne, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Gamache M., Soumis F. A method for optimally solving the rostering problem. (1993) . Les Cahier du GERAD, G-90-40, École des Hautes Études Commerciales, Montréal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  • Gamache M., Soumis F., Villeneuve D., Desrosiers J., Gélinas E. The preferential bidding system at Air Canada. Transportation Sci. (1998) 32:246–255LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gershkoff I. Optimizing flight crew schedules. Interfaces (1989) 19:29–43LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gopalan R., Talluri K. The aircraft maintenance routing problem. Oper. Res. (1998) 46:260–271LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hane C. A., Barnhart C., Johnson E. L., Marsten R. E., Nemhauser G. L., Sigismondi G. The fleet assignment problem: Solving a large-scale integer program. Math. Programming (1995) 70:211–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman K. L., Padberg M. Solving airline crew-scheduling problems by branch-and-cut. Management Sci. (1993) 39:657–682LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobs T. L., Johnson E. L., Smith B. C. O&D; FAM: Incorporating passenger flows into the fleeting process. AGIFORS Sympos. (1999) (New Orleans, LA)Google Scholar
  • Jarrah A., Yu G., Krishnamurthy N., Rakshit A. A decision support framework for airline flight cancellations and delays. Transportation Sci. (1993) 27(3):266–280LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klabjan J., Chebalov S. Robust airline crew pairing optimization. FAA-NEXTOR-INFORMS Sympos. (2003) (Falls Church, VA)Google Scholar
  • Kohl N., Karisch S. E. Airline crew rostering: Problem types, modeling, and optimization. (2002) . Working paper, Carmen Consulting, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  • Lavoie S., Minoux M., Odier E. A new approach for crew pairing problems by column generation with an application to air transportation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1988) 35:45–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lohatepanont M., Barnhart C. Airline schedule planning: Integrated models and algorithms for schedule design and fleet assignment. Transportation Sci. (2001) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Lustig I., Bixby R. (2001) . A historical perspective on linear programming performance. http://www.ilog.com/products/ optimization/times_winter2001/tech_historical.cfmGoogle Scholar
  • Marsten R. Crew planning at Delta Airlines. Math. Programming Sympos. XV (1994) (Ann Arbor, MI)Google Scholar
  • Martin R. C.Large Scale Linear and Integer Optimization: A Unified Approach (1999) (Kluwer Academic Press, Norwell, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mehrotra A., Trick M. A. A column generation approach for exact graph coloring. INFORMS J. Comput. (1996) 8:344–354LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Patty B., Gelman E., Tanga R., Anbil R. Recent advances in crew-pairing optimization at American Airlines. Interfaces (1991) 21:62–74LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Proussaloglou K. E., Koppelman F. S. Air carrier demand: An analysis of market share determinants. Transportation (1995) 22:371–388CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Proussaloglou K. E., Koppelman F. S. The choice of carrier, flight and fare class. J. Air Transport Management (1999) 5(4):193–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rexing B., Barnhart C., Kniker T., Jarrah A., Krishnamurthy N. Airline fleet assignment with time windows. Transportation Sci. (2000) 34(1):1–20LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenberger J., Johnson E., Nemhauser G. A robust fleet assignment model with hub isolation and short cycles. (2001a) . Working paper, SISE, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenberger J., Johnson E., Nemhauser G. Rerouting aircraft for airline recovery. (2001b) . Working paper, SISE, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  • Rushmeier R., Kontogiorgis S. Advances in the optimization of airline fleet assignment. Transportation Sci. (1997) 31(2):159–169LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ryan D. M. The solution of massive generalized set partitioning problems in air crew rostering. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1992) 43:459–467CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryan D. M., Foster B. A., Wren A. An integer programming approach to scheduling. Computer Scheduling of Public Transport Urban Passenger Vehicle and Crew Scheduling (1981) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 269–280Google Scholar
  • Savelsbergh M. W. P. A branch-and-price algorithm for the generalized assignment problem. Oper. Res. (1997) 45:831–841LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Savelsbergh M. W. P., Sol M. The general pickup and delivery problem. Transportation Sci. (1995) 29:17–29LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schaefer A., Johnson E., Kleywegt A., Nemhauser G. Airline crew scheduling under uncertainty. (2001) . Working paper, SISE, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  • Smith B. C., Leimkuhler J. F., Darrow R. M. Yield management at American Airlines. Interfaces (1992) 22:8–31LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stojkovic G., Soumis F., Desrosiers J., Solomon M. An optimization model for a real-time flight scheduling problem. Transportation Res. (2002) 36A:779–788Google Scholar
  • Thengvall B., Yu G., Bard J. Balancing user preferences for aircraft schedule recovery during irregular airline operations. IIE Trans. (2000) 32:181–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vance P. H., Barnhart C., Johnson E. L., Nemhauser G. L. Solving binary cutting stock problems by column generation and branch-and-bound. Comput. Optim. Appl. (1994) 3:111–130CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vance P. H., Barnhart C., Johnson E. L., Nemhauser G. L. Airline crew scheduling: A new formulation and decomposition algorithm. Oper. Res. (1997) 45:188–200LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vanderbeck F. On Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition in integer programming and ways to perform branching in a branch-and-price algorithm. Oper. Res. (2000) 48:111–128LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wiper D. S., Quillinan J. D., Subramanian R., Scheff R. P., Marsten R. E. Coldstart: Fleet assignment at Delta Air Lines. Interfaces (1994) 24:104–120LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yen J., Birge J. A stochastic programming approach to the airline crew scheduling problem. Oper. Res. (2001) . Submitted toGoogle Scholar
  • Yu G., Argüello M., Song G., McCowan S., White A. A new era for crew recovery at Continental Airlines. Interfaces (2003) 33:5–22LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.