Coordinating Supply Chains by Controlling Upstream Variability Propagation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1030.0031

References

  • Anderson E. G., Fine C. H., Parker G. G. Upstream volatility in the supply chain: The machine tool industry as a case study. Production Oper. Management (2000) 9(3):239–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baganha M. P., Cohen M. A. The stabilizing effect of inventory in supply chains. Oper. Res. (1998) S46(3):S72–S83LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Balakrishnan A., Geunes J., Pangburn M. S. A constrained replenishment model for upstream variability control in two-stage distribution systems. (2002) . Working paper, Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  • Balakrishnan A., Geunes J., Pangburn M. S. Impact of variability control agreements on distribution chain performance. (2003) . Working paper, Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  • Bassok Y., Anupindi R. Analysis of supply contracts with total minimum commitment. IIE Trans. (1997) 29(5):373–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourland K. E., Powell S. G., Pyke D. F. Exploiting timely demand information to reduce inventories. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1996) 92:239–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P. Managing supply chain demand variability with scheduled ordering policies. Management Sci. (1999) 45(6):843–856LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Fisher M. Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information. Management Sci. (2000) 46(8):1032–1048LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Zipkin P. H. Competitive and cooperative inventory policies in a two-stage supply chain. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):936–953LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F. Decentralized supply chains subject to information delays. Management Sci. (1999) 45(8):1076–1090LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F. Market segmentation, advanced demand information, and supply chain performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2001) 3(1):53–67LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F., Drezner Z., Ryan J. K., Simchi-Levi D. Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information. Management Sci. (2000) 46(3):436–443LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. A., Lee H. L. Strategic analysis of integrated production-distribution systems: Models and methods. Oper. Res. (1988) 36(2):216–228LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett C. J., Decroix G. A. Shared-savings contracts for indirect materials in supply chains: Channel profits and environmental impacts. Management Sci. (2001) 47(7):881–893LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cruickshanks A. B., Drescher R. D., Graves S. C. A study of production smoothing in a job shop environment. Management Sci. (1984) 30(3):368–380LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dejonckheere J., Disney S. M., Lambrecht M. R., Towill D. R. Transfer function analysis of forecasting induced bullwhip in supply chains. Internat. J. Production Econom. (2002) 78:133–144CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dejonckheere J., Disney S. M., Lambrecht M. R., Towill D. R. Measuring and avoiding the bullwhip effect: A control theoretic approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2003) 147:567–590CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ernst R., Pyke D. F. Optimal base stock policies and truck capacity in a two-echelon system. Naval Res. Logist. (1993) 40:879–904CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallego G., Özer Ö. Integrating replenishment decisions with advance demand information. Management Sci. (2001) 47(10):1344–1360LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gavirneni S., Kapuscinski R., Tayur S. Value of information in capacitated supply chains. Management Sci. (1999) 45(1):16–24LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Graves S. C., Willems S. P. Optimizing strategic safety stock placement in supply chains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2(1):68–83LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Graves S. C., Kletter D. B., Hetzel W. B. A dynamic model for requirements planning with application to supply chain optimization. Oper. Res. (1998) 46(S3):S35–S49LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hariharan R., Zipkin P. H. Customer-order information, leadtimes, and inventories. Management Sci. (1995) 41(10):1599–1607LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Henig M., Gerchak Y., Ernst R., Pyke D. F. An inventory model embedded in designing a supply contract. Management Sci. (1997) 43(2):184–189LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H. L., Whang S. Decentralized multi-echelon supply chains: Incentives and information. Management Sci. (1999) 45(5):633–640LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H. L., Padmanabhan V., Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):546–558LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H. L., So K. C., Tang C. S. The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Sci. (2000) 46(5):626–643LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moinzadeh K., Nahmias S. Adjustment strategies for a fixed delivery contract. Oper. Res. (2000) 48(3):408–423LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nahmias S.Production and Operations Analysis (2001) 4th ed.(McGraw-Hill, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Porteus E. L., Heyman D. P., Sobel M. Stochastic inventory theory. Handbooks in OR & MS (1990) 2(North-Holland, Elsevier Publishers B.V., New York) Google Scholar
  • Stalk G., Evans P., Shulman L. E. Competing on capabilities: The new rules of corporate strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1992) 70(2):57–69Google Scholar
  • Sterman J. D. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Sci. (1989) 35(3):321–339LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tsay A. A., Nahmias S., Agrawal N., Tayur S., Ganeshan R., Magazine M. Modeling supply chain contracts: A review, Chapter 10. Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.