Extending the Horizons: Environmental Excellence as Key to Improving Operations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1060.0095

References

  • Angell L. C. Comparing the environmental and quality initiatives of Baldrige Award winners. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10(3):306–326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Angell L. C., Klassen R. D. Integrating environmental issues into the mainstream: An agenda for research in operations management. J. Oper. Management (1999) 17:575–598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow K. J., Harris T., Marschak J. Optimal inventory policy. Econometrica (1951) 19(3):250–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Axsäter S.Inventory Control (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ayres R. U., Ayres L. W.A Handbook of Industrial Ecology (2002) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barry J., Girard G., Perras C. Logistics planning shifts into reverse. J. Eur. Bus. (1993) 5(1):34Google Scholar
  • Beckman S., Bercovitz J., Rosen C., Madu C. N. Environmentally sound supply chain management. Handbook of Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing (2001) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) 363–383CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Besanko D., Dranove D., Shanley M.Economics of Strategy (2000) (J. Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Black J. A., Boal K. B. Strategic resources: Traits, configurations and paths to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(Special Issue):131–148Google Scholar
  • Boudreau J., Hopp W., McClain J. O., Thomas L. J. On the interface between operations and human resources management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2003) 5(3):179–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bowen F., Cousins P. D., Lamming R. C., Faruk A. C. The role of supply management capabilities in green supply. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10(2):174–189CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bragdon J., Marlin J. Is pollution profitable? Risk Management (1972) 19(4):9–18Google Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Graves S., de Kok T. Supply chain coordination with contracts, Ch. 7. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management (2003) Vol. 11(North Holland, Amsterdam) 341–422Google Scholar
  • Caldentey R., Mondschein S. Policy model for pollution control in the copper industry, including a model for the sulfuric acid market. Oper. Res. (2003) 51(1):1–16LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carter C. R. Purchasing social responsibility and firm performance: The key mediating roles of organizational learning and supplier performance. Internat. J. Physical Distribution Logist. Management (2005) 35(3/4):177–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carter C. R., Ellram L. M. Reverse logistics: A review of the literature and framework for future investigation. J. Bus. Logist. (1998) 19(1):85–102Google Scholar
  • Carter C. R., Kale R., Grimm C. M. Environmental purchasing and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Transportation Res. Part E, Logist. Transportation Rev. (2000) 36E(3):219–228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F., Graves S., de Kok T. Information sharing and supply chain coordination. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management (2002) (North Holland)Google Scholar
  • Clarkson B. E.The Corporation and Its Stakeholders: Classic and Contemporary Readings (1998) (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett C. J., DeCroix G. A. Shared savings contracts for indirect materials in supply chains: Channel profits and environmental impacts. Management Sci. (2001) 47(7):881–893LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett C. J., Kirsch D. A. International diffusion of ISO 14000 certification. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10(3):327–342CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett C. J., Pan J. Evaluating environmental performance using statistical process control techniques. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2002) 139:68–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett C. J., Van Wassenhove L. N. The green fee: Internalizing and operationalizing environmental issues. California Management Rev. (1993) 36(1):116–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett C. J., Kirsch D. A., Montes M. J. The financial impact of ISO 9000 certification. Management Sci. (2005) 51(7):1046–1059LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Crosby P. B.Quality is Free (1979) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dekker R., Fleischmann M., Inderfurth K., Van Wassenhove L. N.Reverse Logistics: Quantitative Models for Closed-Loop Supply Chains (2004) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delmas M. Stakeholders and competitive advantage: The case of ISO 14001. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10(3):343–358CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Derwall J., Guenster N., Bauer R., Koedijk K. The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts J. (2005) 61(2):51–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dierickx I., Cool K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. (1989) 35(12):1504–1511LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dodge H., Romig H. A method of sampling inspection. Bell System Tech. J. (1929) 8:613–631CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dowell G., Hart S., Yeung B. Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Sci. (2000) 46(8):1059–1074LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Easton G. S., Jarrell S. L. The effects of total quality management on corporate performance: An empirical investigation. J. Bus. (1998) 71(2):253–307CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epstein M. J., Wisner P. S. Using a balanced scorecard to implement sustainability. Environ. Quality Management (2001) 11(2):1–10CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans J. R., Lindsay W. M.Management and the Control of Quality (2001) 5th ed.(South-Western College Publishers)Google Scholar
  • Farber S., Griner B. Using conjoint analysis to value ecosystem change. Environ. Sci. Tech. (2000) 34(8):1407–1412CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischhoff B., Kahneman D., Tversky A. Value elicitation: Is there anything out there? Choices, Values, and Frames (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 620–641CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleischmann M., Beullens P., Bloemhof-Ruwaard J. M., Van Wassenhove L. N. The impact of product recovery on logistics network design. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10(2):156–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleischmann M., Bloemhof-Ruwaard J. M., Dekker R., van der Laan E., van Nunen J. A. E. E., Van Wassenhove L. N. Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 103(1):1–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Florida R. Lean and green: The move to environmentally conscious manufacturing. California Management Rev. (1996) 39(1):80–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Florida R., Davison D. Gaining from green management: Environmental management systems inside and outside the factory. California Management Rev. (2001) 43(3):64–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman H. M.Industrial Pollution Prevention Handbook (1995) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Freeman R. E.Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (1984) (Pitman, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Friedman M.Capitalism and Freedom (1962) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Garvin D. A. Quality on the line. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1983) 61(5):64–75Google Scholar
  • Geffen C. A., Rothenberg S. Suppliers and environmental innovation: The automotive paint process. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management (2000) 20(2):166–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geoffrion A. M., Powers R. F. Twenty years of strategic distribution system design: An evolutionary perspective. Interfaces (1995) 25(5):105–127LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Geyer R., Jackson T. Supply loops and their constraints: The industrial ecology of recycling and reuse. California Management Rev. (2004) 46(2):55–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R. M. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Rev. (1991) 33(3):114–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green K., Morton B., New S. Green purchasing and supply policies: Do they improve companies’ environmental performance? Supply Chain Management (1998) 3(2):89–95CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guide V. D. R. Production planning and remanufacturing: Industry practice and research needs. J. Oper. Management (2000) 18:467–483CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guide V. D. R., Van Wassenhove L. N. The reverse supply chain. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2002) 80(2):25–26Google Scholar
  • Guide V. D. R., Van Wassenhove L. N.Business Aspects of Closed-Loop Supply Chains. International Management Series (2003) Vol. 2(The Carnegie Bosch Institute, Pittsburgh, PA) Google Scholar
  • Guide V. D. R., Jayaraman V., Linton J. D. Building contingency planning for closed-loop supply chains with product recovery. J. Oper. Management (2003) 21(3):259–279CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Handfield R. B., Melnyk S. A. The scientific theory-building process: A primer using the case of TQM. J. Oper. Management (1998) 16(4):321–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Handfield R. B., Walton S. V., Seeger L. K., Melnyk S. A. Green value chain practices in the furniture industry. J. Oper. Management (1997) 15(4):293–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart S. L. A natural resource-based view of the firm. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(4):986–1014CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart S. L., Christensen C. M. The great leap: Driving innovation from the base of the pyramid. Sloan Management Rev. (2002) 44(1):51–56Google Scholar
  • Hart S. L., Milstein M. B. Global sustainability and the creative destruction of industries. Sloan Management Rev. (1999) 41(1):23–33Google Scholar
  • Hendricks K. B., Singhal V. R. Quality awards and the market value of the firm: An empirical investigation. Management Sci. (1996) 42(3):415–436LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hendricks K. B., Singhal V. R. Does implementing an effective TQM program actually improve operating performance? Empirical evidence from firms that have won quality awards. Management Sci. (1997) 43(9):1258–1274LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hendricks K. B., Singhal V. R. The long-run stock price performance of firms with effective TQM programs. Management Sci. (2001) 47(3):359–368LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hendricks K. B., Singhal V. R. The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth. J. Oper. Management (2003) 21(5):501–522CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hopfenbeck W.Fx (1993) (Prentice Hall, New York) Google Scholar
  • Juran J. M., Godfrey A. B.Juran’s Quality Handbook (1998) 5th ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74(1):75–85Google Scholar
  • Kassinis G. I., Soteriou A. C. Greening the service profit chain: The impact of environmental management practices. Production Oper. Management (2003) 12(3):386–403CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiernan M. J. Eco-value, sustainability, and shareholder value: Driving environmental performance to the bottom line. Environ. Quality Management (2001) 10(4):1–12CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King A. A., Lenox M. J. Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(4):698–716CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King A. A., Lenox M. J. Lean and green? An empirical examination of the relationship between lean production and environmental performance. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10(3):244–256CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King A. A., Lenox M. J. Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Sci. (2002) 48(2):289–299LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kitazawa S., Sarkis J. The relationship between ISO 14001 and continuous source reduction programs. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management (2000) 20(2):225–248CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klassen R. D. Just-in-time manufacturing and pollution prevention generate mutual benefits in the furniture industry. Interfaces (2000a) 30(3):95–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klassen R. D. Exploring the linkage between investment in manufacturing and environmental technologies. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management (2000b) 20(2):127–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klassen R. D., Johnson P. F., Westbrook R., New S. The green supply chain. Understanding Supply Chains—Concepts, Critiques, and Futures (2004) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 229–251Google Scholar
  • Klassen R. D., McLaughlin C. P. TQM and environmental excellence in manufacturing. Indust. Management Data Systems (1993) 93(6):14–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klassen R. D., McLaughlin C. P. The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Sci. (1996) 42(8):1199–1214LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kleindorfer P. R., Orts E. W. Informational regulation of environmental risks. Risk Anal. (1998) 18(2):155–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kleindorfer P. R., Van Wassenhove L. N., Gatignon H., Kimberly J. R. Managing risk in global supply chains. The INSEAD-Wharton Alliance on Globalizing: Strategies for Building Successful Global Businesses (2004) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 288–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kleindorfer P. R., Belke J. C., Elliott M. R., Lee K., Lowe R. A., Feldman H. I. Accident epidemiology and the U.S. chemical industry: Accident history and worst-case data from RMP*Info. Risk Anal. (2003) 23(5):865–881CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Konar S., Cohen M. A. Does the market value environmental performance? Rev. Econom. Statist. (2001) 83(2):281–289CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krause D. R., Scannell T. V., Calantone R. J. A structural analysis of the effectiveness of buying firms’ strategies to improve supplier performance. Decision Sci. (2000) 31(1):33–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuhn T. S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1970) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Lamming R., Hampson J. The environment as a supply chain management issue. Brit. J. Management (1996) 7(Special Issue):S45–S62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lapré M. A., Mukherjee A. S., Van Wassenhove L. N. Behind the learning curve: Linking learning activities to waste reduction. Management Sci. (2000) 46(5):597–611LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Larson A. L., Teisberg E. O., Johnson R. R. Sustainable business: Opportunity and value creation. Interfaces (2000) 30(3):1–12LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liker J. K.The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer (2004) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Madu C. N.Competing on Quality and Environment (2003) (Chi Publishers, Fairfield, CT) Google Scholar
  • Majumder P., Groenevelt H. Competition in remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10(2):125–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Matthews H. S. Thinking outside “the box”: Designing a packaging take-back system. California Management Rev. (2004) 46(2):105–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGuire J. B., Sungren A., Schneeweis T. Corporate social responsibility and firm performance. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(4):854–872CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mendel P. J., Hoffman A., Ventresca M. International standardization and global governance: The spread of quality and environmental management standards. Organizations, Policy, and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives (2001) (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA) Google Scholar
  • Micklethwait J., Wooldridge A.The Company: A Short History of a Revolutionary Idea (2003) (Random House, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Min H., Galle W. P. Green purchasing strategies: Trends and implications. Internat. J. Purchasing Materials Management (1997) 33(3):10–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman W. R., Hanna M. D. An empirical exploration of the relationship between manufacturing strategy and environmental management. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management (1996) 16(4):69–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pall G. A.The Process-Centered Enterprise: The Power of Commitments (2000) (St. Lucie Press, Boca Raton, FL) Google Scholar
  • Perrow C.Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pil F. K., Rothenberg S. Environmental performance as a driver of superior quality. Production Oper. Management (2003) 12(3):404–415CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter M. E., van der Linde C. Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1995) 73(5):120–134Google Scholar
  • Potoski M., Prakash A. Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities’ environmental performance. J. Policy Anal. Management (2005) 24(4):745–769CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rajaram K., Corbett C. J. Achieving environmental and productivity improvements through model-based process redesign. Oper. Res. (2002) 50(5):751–763LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reinhardt F. L. Bringing the environment down to earth. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) 77(4):149–179Google Scholar
  • Reiskin E. D., White A. L., Johnson J. K., Votta T. J. Servicizing the chemical supply chain. J. Indust. Ecology (2000) 3(2&3):19–31Google Scholar
  • Rogers D. S., Tibben-Lembke R. S.Going Backwards: Reverse Logistics Trends and Practices (1999) (Reverse Logistics Executive Council, Pittsburgh, PA) Google Scholar
  • Romm J. J.Cool Companies: How the Best Businesses Boost Profits and Productivity by Cutting Greenhouse Gas Emissions (1999) (Island Press, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
  • Rothenberg S., Pil F. K., Maxwell J. Lean, green, and the quest for superior environmental performance. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10(3):228–243CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russo M. V., Fouts P. A. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(3):534–559CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russo M. V., Harrison N. S. Organizational design and environmental performance: Clues from the electronics industry. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(4):582–593CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shah R., Ward P. T. Lean manufacturing: Context, practice bundles, and performance. J. Oper. Management (2003) 21(2):129–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shewhart W. A.The Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product (1931) (D. Van Nostrand Co., New York) Google Scholar
  • Snir E. M. Liability as a catalyst for product stewardship. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10(2):190–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sterman J. D. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Sci. (1989) 35(3):321–339LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stock J. R.Development and Implementation of Reverse Logistics Programs (1998) (Council of Logistics Management, Oak Brook, IL) Google Scholar
  • Thierry M., Salomon M., van Nunen J., van Wassenhove L. N. Strategic issues in product recovery management. California Management Rev. (1995) 37(2):114–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vachon S., Klassen R. D., Johnson P. F., Sarkis J. Customers as green suppliers: Managing the complexity of the reverse supply chain. Green Manufacturing and Operations: From Design to Delivery and Back (2001) (Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK) 136–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Hoek R. I. From reversed logistics to green supply chains. Supply Chain Management (1999) 4(3):129–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatachalam L. The contingent valuation method: A review. Environ. Impact Assessment Rev. (2004) 24:89–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wallace W.The Logic of Science in Sociology (1971) (Aldine Atherton, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Walton S. V., Handfield R. B., Melnyk S. A. The green supply chain: Integrating suppliers into environmental management processes. Internat. J. Purchasing Materials Management (1998) 34(2):2–11CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolf F. G. Operationalizing and testing normal accident theory in petrochemical plants and refineries. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10(3):292–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.