Supply Chain Coordination for False Failure Returns

References

• Cachon G., de Kok A. G., Graves S. C. Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research & Management Science (2003) Vol. 11(Elsevier B. V., New York) 13–59Ch. 6Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cha A. E. Some shoppers find fewer happy returns: Databases limit “excessive” exchanges. The Washington Post (2004) November 7):A.01Google Scholar
• Choi T., Li D., Yan H. Optimal return policy for supply chain with e-marketplace. Internat. J. Production Econom. (2004) 88:205–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chowdhury J. The motivational impact of sales quotas in effort. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30:28–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darmon R. Setting sales quotas with conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. (1979) 16:133–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davey S. Personal communication with the authors. (2001) . World wide product returns manager, Inkjet Products Group, Hewlett-Packard CompanyGoogle Scholar
• Davis O., Farley J. Allocating sales force effort with commissions and quotas. Management Sci. (1971) 18:55–63Link, Google Scholar
• Davis S., Gerstner E., Hagerty M. Money back guarantees in retailing: Matching products to consumer tastes. J. Retailing (1995) 71:7–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Debo L., Toktay B., Van Wassenhove L. Market segmentation and technology selection for remanufacturable products. Management Sci. (2005) 51:1193–1205Link, Google Scholar
• Ferguson M., Toktay B. The effect of external competition on recovery strategies. Production Oper. Management (2006) 15(3Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrer G., Ketzenberg M. Value of information in remanufacturing complex products. IIE Trans. (2004) 36:265–277Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleischmann M.Quantitative Models for Reverse Logistics. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (2001) Vol. 501(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaba A., Kalra A. Risk behavior in response to quotas and contests. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18:417–434Link, Google Scholar
• Guide V. D. R. Production planning and control for remanufacturing. J. Oper. Management (2000) 18:467–483Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guide V. D. R., Van Wassenhove L. Closed-loop supply chains. Business Aspects of Closed-Loop Supply Chains (2003) (Carnegie Mellon University Press, Pittsburgh, PA) Google Scholar
• Guide V. D. R., Souza G., Van Wassenhove L., Blackburn J. Time value of commercial product returns. Management Sci. (2006) 52(8Link, Google Scholar
• Heese H., Cattani K., Ferrer G., Gilland W., Roth A. Competitive advantage through take-back of used products. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2005) 164:143–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helbig Barbara. Personal communication with the authors. (2002) . Solution and services manager, Equipment Management and Remarketing, Hewlett-Packard GmbHGoogle Scholar
• Kumar N., Guide V. D. R., Van Wassenhove L. Managing product returns at Hewlett Packard. (2002) . Teaching Case 05/2002-4940, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
• Majumder P., Groenevelt H. Competition in remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10:125–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mantrala M., Raman K., Desiraju R. Sales quota plans: Mechanisms for adaptive learning. Marketing Lett. (1997) 8:393–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mantrala M., Sinha P., Zoltners A. Structuring a multiproduct sales quota-bonus plan for a heterogeneous salesforce: A practical model-based approach. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13:121–144Link, Google Scholar
• McWilliams G. Minding the store: Analyzing customers, Best Buy decides not all are welcome; retailer aims to outsmart dogged bargain-hunters, and coddle big spenders. The Wall Street Journal (2004) November 8):A.1Google Scholar
• Padmanabhan V., Png I. Returns policies: Make money by making good. Sloan Management Rev. (1995) 37(1):65–72Google Scholar
• Padmanabhan V., Png I. Manufacturer’s returns policies and retail competition. Marketing Sci. (1997) 17:81–94Link, Google Scholar
• Pasternack B. A. Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(2):166–176Link, Google Scholar
• Raju J., Srinivasan V. Quota-based compensation plans for multiterritory heterogeneous salesforces. Management Sci. (1996) 42:1454–1462Link, Google Scholar
• Reiss H. Personal communication with the authors. (2003) . Vice-President & General Manager, Equipment Manufacturing & Remarketing, Hewlett-Packard Co., GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Savaskan R., Bhattacharya S., Van Wassenhove L. Channel choice and coordination in a remanufacturing environment. Management Sci. (2004) 50:239–252Link, Google Scholar
• Souza G., Ketzenberg M., Guide V. D. R. Capacitated remanufacturing with service level constraints. Production Oper. Management (2002) 11:231–248Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock J., Speh T., Shear H. Many happy (product) returns. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2002) 80(7):16–17Google Scholar
• Tapiero C., Farley J. Optimal control of sales force effort in time. Management Sci. (1975) 21:976–985Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor T. Supply chain coordination under channel rebates with sales effort effects. Management Sci. (2002) 48:992–1007Link, Google Scholar
• Toktay B., Guide V. D. R., Van Wassenhove L. N. Forecasting product returns. Business Aspects of Closed-Loop Supply Chains (2003) (Carnegie Mellon University Press, Pittsburgh, PA) 203–220Google Scholar
• Toktay B., Wein L., Zenios S. Inventory management of remanufacturable products. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1412–1426Link, Google Scholar
• Tsay A. Managing retail channel overstock: Markdown money and return policies. J. Retailing (2001) 77:457–492Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valenta R. Personal communication with the authors. (2002) . Director, Product Service, Robert Bosch Tool CorporationGoogle Scholar
• van der Laan E., Salomon M., Dekker R., Van Wassenhove L. Inventory control in hybrid systems with remanufacturing. Management Sci. (1999) 45:733–747Link, Google Scholar
• Winer L. The effect of product sales quotas on sales force productivity. J. Marketing Res. (1973) 10:180–183Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood S. Remote purchase environments: The influence of return policy leniency on two-stage decision processes. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38:157–169Crossref, Google Scholar