Simple Relational Contracts to Motivate Capacity Investment: Price Only vs. Price and Quantity

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1060.0126

References

  • Abreu D., Pearce D. G., Selten R. A perspective on renegotiation in repeated games. Game Equilibrium Models II: Methods, Moral, and Markets (1991) (Springer Verlag, Berlin) 44–55Google Scholar
  • Atkins D., Krishnan H., Zhao X. Renegotiation-proof relational contracts in supply chains. (2006) . Working paper, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  • Baker G., Gibbons R., Murphy K. J. Bringing the market inside the firm. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(2):212–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker G., Gibbons R., Murphy K. J. Relational contracts and the theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117(1):39–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Graves S., De Kok T. Supply chain coordination with contracts. The Handbook of Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management (2003) (North Holland, Amsterdam) 229–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Lariviere M. A. Contracting to assure supply: How to share demand forecasts in a supply chain. Management Sci. (2001) 47(5):629–646LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Lariviere M. A. Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):30–44LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F., Graves S., De Kok T. Information sharing and supply chain coordination. The Handbook of Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management (2003) (North Holland, Amsterdam) 341–421CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. A., Ho T. H., Ren J. Z., Terwiesch C. Measuring imputed costs in the semiconductor equipment supply chain. Management Sci. (2003) 49(12):1653–1670LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett C. J. Stochastic inventory systems in a supply chain with asymmetric information: Cycle stocks, safety stocks, and consignment stock. Oper. Res. (2001) 49(4):487–500LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Debo L., Sun J. Repeatedly selling to the newsvendor in fluctuating markets: The impact of the discount factor on supply chain. (2004) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. H., Chu W. The determinants of trust in supplier-automaker relationships in the U.S., Japan and Korea. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2000) 31(2):259–285CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E., Gachter S., Kirchsteiger G. Reciprocity as a contract enforcement device: Experimental evidence. Econometrica (1997) 65(4):833–860CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D., Levine D., Maskin E. The folk theorem with imperfect public information. Econometrica (1994) 62:997–1039CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman S. J., Hart O. D. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94(4):691–719CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ha A. Supplier-buyer contracting: Asymmetric cost information and cutoff level policy for buyer participation. Naval Res. Logist. (2001) 48(1):41–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helper S. The automobile industry. Bus. History Rev. (1991) 65(4):781–824CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson B. Quantifying and managing supply risk and flexibility at Agilent Technologies. (2003) . Teaching case, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Lariviere M. A. A note on probability distributions with increasing generalized failure rates. Oper. Res. (2006) 54(3):602–604LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lariviere M. A., Porteus E. Selling to the newsvendor: An analysis of price-only contracts. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2001) 3(4):293–305LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levin J. Relational incentive contracts. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2003) 93(3):835–847CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nash J. The bargaining problem. Econometrica (1950) 28(2):155–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Özer Ö, Wei W. Strategic commitment for optimal capacity decision under asymmetric forecast information. Management Sci. (2006) 52(8):1238–1257LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pasternack B. A. Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(2):166–176LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Plambeck E. P., Taylor T. A. Partnership in a dynamic production system with unobservable actions and noncontractible output. Management Sci. (2006) 52(10):1509–1527LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ren J. Z., Cohen M. A., Ho T. H., Terwiesch C. Sharing forecast information in a long-term supply chain relationship. (2005) . Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Rubinstein A. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica (1982) 50(2):97–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sako M.Prices, Quality, and Trust (1992) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schweitzer M. E., Hershey J. C., Bradlow E. T. Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2005) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor T. A. Coordination under channel rebates with sales effort effects. Management Sci. (2002) 48(8):992–1007LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor T. A., Plambeck E. L. Supply chain relationships and contracts: The impact of repeated interaction on capacity investment and procurement. (2003) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor T. A., Plambeck E. L. Technical appendix to “Simple Relational Contracts to Motivate Capacity Investment: Price-Only vs. Price and Quantity.”. (2007) . http://www.informs.org/Pubs/Supplements/MSOM/1526-5498-2007-09-01-0094-ecompanion.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Tomlin B. Capacity investments in supply chains, sharing-the-gain rather than sharing-the-pain. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2003) 5(4):317–333LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tsay A. A. The quantity flexibility contract and supplier-customer incentives. Management Sci. (1999) 45(10):1339–1358LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tunca T., Zenios S. A. Supply auctions and relational contracts for procurement. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2006) 8(1):43–67LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van Mieghem J. A. Coordinating investment, production, and subcontracting. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):954–971LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.