Workforce Agility in Repair and Maintenance Environments

References

• Agnihothri S. R. Interrelationships between performance measures for the machine-repairman problem. Naval Res. Logist. (1989) 36:265–271Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bahnasawi A. A., Mahmoud M. S., Eid S. Z. Sensitivity analysis of machine interference in manufacturing systems. Comput. Indust. Engrg. (1996) 30:753–764Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandra M. J. A study of multiple finite-source queueing models. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1986) 37:275–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandra M. J., Sargent R. G. A numerical method to obtain the equilibrium results for the multiple finite source priority queueing model. Management Sci. (1983) 29:1298–1308Link, Google Scholar
• Cox D. R., Smith W. L.Queues (1961) (Methuen and Wiley, London, UK and New York) Google Scholar
• Gans N., Koole G., Mandelbaum A. Telephone call centers: Tutorial, review and research prospects. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2003) 5:79–141Link, Google Scholar
• Gurumurthi S., Benjaafar S. Modelling and analysis of flexible queueing systems. Naval Res. Logistics (2004) 51:755–782Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hopp W. J., Van Oyen M. P. Agile workforce evaluation: A framework for cross-training and coordination. IIE Trans. (2004) 36:919–940Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hopp W. J., Tekin E., Van Oyen M. P. Benefits of skill chaining in production lines with cross-trained workers. Management Sci. (2004) 50:83–98Link, Google Scholar
• Iravani S. M. R., Kolfal B. When does the cμ rule apply to finite-population queueing systems? Oper. Res. Lett. (2005) 33:301–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iravani S. M. R., Krishnamurthy V., Chao G. H. Optimal server scheduling in nonpreemptive finite-population queueing systems. Queueing Systems (2006) (Forthcoming)Google Scholar
• Iravani S. M., Sims K., Van Oyen M. P. Structural flexibility: A new perspective of manufacturing and service operations. Management Sci. (2005) 51:151–166Link, Google Scholar
• Jordan W. C., Graves S. C. Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility. Management Sci. (1995) 41:577–594Link, Google Scholar
• Jordan W. C., Inman R. R., Blumenfeld D. E. Chained cross-training of workers for robust performance. IIE Trans. (2004) 36:953–967Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kameda H. A finite-source queue with different customers. J. Assoc. Comput. Machinery (1982) 29:478–491Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kececioglu D.Reliability Engineering Handbook (1991) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Koulamas C. P. A bicriterian algorithm for minimizing machine interference and reducing job waiting time. Internat. J. Systems Sci. (1992) 23:1229–1235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koulamas C. P. Scheduling two parallel semiautomatic machines to minimize machine interference. Comput. Oper. Res. (1996) 23:945–956Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippman S. A. Applying a new device in the optimization of exponential queueing systems. Oper. Res. (1975) 23:687–710Link, Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum A., Stolyar A. Scheduling flexible servers with convex delay costs: Heavy-traffic optimality of the generalized cmu-rule. Oper. Res. (2004) 52:836–855Link, Google Scholar
• Pinker E. J., Shumsky R. A. The efficiency-quality trade-off of cross-trained workers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2:32–42Link, Google Scholar
• Shawky A. I. The single-server machine interference model with balking, reneging and an additional server for longer queues. Microelectronics Reliability (1997) 37:355–357Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheikhzadeh M., Benjaafar S., Gupta D. Machine sharing in manufacturing systems: Total flexibility versus chaining. Internat. J. Flexible Manufacturing Systems (1998) 10:351–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stecke K. E. Machine interference: Assignment of machines to operators. Handbook of Industrial Engineering (1992) 2nd ed.:1460–1494Google Scholar
• Stecke K. E., Aronson J. E. Review of operator machine interference models. Internat. J. Production Res. (1985) 23:129–151Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Mieghem J. A. Dynamic scheduling with convex delay costs: The generalized cμ rule. Ann. Appl. Probab. (1995) 5:808–833Crossref, Google Scholar