Design Architecture and Introduction Timing for Rapidly Improving Industrial Products

References

• ASML ASML annual report. (2001) . http://www.cubi.nl/pdf/Asml/jaarverslag2001.pdfGoogle Scholar
• ASML ASML annual report. (2005) . http://www.cubi.nl/pdf/Asml/jaarverslag2005.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B. Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(5):84–93Google Scholar
• Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B.Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (2000) 1(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya S., Krishnan V., Mahajan V. Operationalizing technology improvements in product development decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2003) 149(1):102–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bulow J. I. Durable goods monopolists. J. Political Econom. (1982) 90(2):314–332Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase R. H. Durability and monopoly. J. Law Econom. (1972) 15(1):143–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai P., Kekre S., Radhakrishnan S., Srinivasan K. Product differentiation and commonality in design: Balancing revenue and cost drivers. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):27–51Link, Google Scholar
• Dhebar A. Durable-goods monopolists, rational consumers, and improving products. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(1):100–120Link, Google Scholar
• Dhebar A. Speeding high-tech producer, meet the balking consumer. Sloan Management Rev. (1996) 37(2):37–49Google Scholar
• Erat S., Kavadias S. Introduction of new technologies to competing industrial consumers. Management Sci. (2006) 52(11):1675–1688Link, Google Scholar
• Fisher M., Ramdas K., Ulrich K. Component sharing in the management of product variety: A study of automotive-braking systems. Management Sci. (1999) 45(3):297–315Link, Google Scholar
• Fishman A., Rob R. Product innovation by a durable-good monopolist. RAND J. Econom. (2000) 31(2):237–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Tirole J. Upgrades, trade-ins, and buybacks. RAND J. Econom. (1998) 29(2):235–258Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R., Kumaraswamy A. Changing competitive dynamics in network industries: An exploration of Sun Microsystems' open systems strategy. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(5):351–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graves S. B. The time-cost trade-off in research and development: A review. Engrg. Costs Production Econom. (1989) 16:1–9Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoppe H. C. The timing of new technology adoption: Theoretical models and empirical evidence. Manchester School (2002) 70(1):56–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kekre S., Srinivasan K. Broader product line: A necessity to achieve success? Management Sci. (1990) 36(10):1216–1231Link, Google Scholar
• Kim K., Chhajed D. Commonality in product design: Cost saving, valuation change, and cannibalization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2000) 125(3):602–621Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kornish L. J. Pricing for a durable-goods monopolist under rapid sequential innovation. Management Sci. (2001) 47(11):1552–1561Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V., Ramachandran K. Credible commitment in modular sequential innovation with integrated product design and pricing. (2006) . Working paper, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
• Krishnan V., Zhu W. Designing a family of development-intensive products. Management Sci. (2006) 52(6):813–825Link, Google Scholar
• Langlois R. N., Robertson P. R. Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo-equipment industries. Res. Policy (1992) 21:297–313Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mikkola J. H., Gassmann O. Managing modularity of product architectures: Toward an integrated theory. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2003) 50(2):204–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorthy K. S., Png I. P. L. Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions. Management Sci. (1992) 38(3):345–359Link, Google Scholar
• Morris C. R., Ferguson C. H. How architecture wins technology wars. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1993) 71(2):86–96Google Scholar
• Mussa M., Rosen S. Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory (1978) 18(2):301–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newsweek Upholding Moore's law. (2002) . (March 25)Google Scholar
• PC Magazine Coming attractions. (2003) . (May 6)Google Scholar
• Sanchez R. Modular architectures in the marketing process. J. Marketing (1999) 63(Special Issue):92–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanderson S., Uzumeri M. Managing product families: The case of the Sony Walkman. Res. Policy (1995) 24(5):761–782Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silverman P. J. The Intel lithography roadmap. Intel Tech. J. (2002) 6(2):55–63Google Scholar
• Simon H. A.The Sciences of the Artificial (1969) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Stokey N. L. Intertemporal price discrimination. Quart. J. Econom. (1979) 93(3):355–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stokey N. L. Learning by doing and the introduction of new goods. J. Political Econom. (1988) 96(4):701–717Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tortoriello R. A rising star on the chipmaker scene. Business Week Online (2003) July 11). http://www.businessweek.com/Google Scholar
• Ulrich K. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy (1995) 24(3):419–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich K. T., Ellison D. Holistic consumer requirements and the design-select decision. Management Sci. (1999) 45(5):641–658Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas M. Product line design for a distribution channel. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(2):156–169Link, Google Scholar
• Waldman M. Planned obsolescence and the R&D decision. RAND J. Econom. (1996) 27(3):583–595Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wall Street Journal, The Computers: Compaq chases rivals in move to modular PCs. (1991) . (September 10)Google Scholar