Dynamic Inventory Management with Learning About the Demand Distribution and Substitution Probability

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1070.0165

References

  • Agrawal N., Smith S. Optimal retail assortments for substitutable items purchased in set. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. (1998) 50(7):793–822Google Scholar
  • Anupindi R., Dada M., Gupta S. Estimation of consumer demand with stockout based substitution: An application to vending machine products. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(4):406–423LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Armony M., Plambeck E. The impact of duplicate orders on demand estimation and capacity investment. Management Sci. (2005) 51(10):1505–1518LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Azoury K. S. Bayes solution to dynamic inventory models under unknown demand distribution. Management Sci. (1985) 31:1150–1160LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bensoussan A., Cakanyildirim M., Sethi S. P. A multi-period newsvendor problem with partially observed demand. Math. Oper. Res. (2005) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Chen L. Optimal information acquisition, inventory control, and forecast sharing in operations management. (2005) . Unpublished PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Ding X., Puterman M. L., Bisi A. The censored newsvendor and the optimal acquisition of information. Oper. Res. (2002) 50(3):517–527LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eppen G. D., Iyer A. V. Improved fashion buying with Bayesian updates. Oper. Res. (1997) 45(6):805–819LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ernst R., Kouvelis P. The effects of selling package goods on inventory decisions. Management Sci. (1999) 45(8):1142–1155LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ethier S. N., Kurtz T. G.Markov Processes: Characterization and Convergence (1986) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garennes C. Area car buyers line up to purchase hybrids. News-Gazette (2004) June 2). Champaign-Urbana, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Hall P., Heyde C. C.Martingale Limit Theory and Its Application (1980) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Harpaz G., Lee W. Y., Winkler R. L. Learning, experimentation, and the optimal output decisions of a competitive firm. Management Sci. (1982) 28(6):589–603LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heyman D. P., Sobel M. J. Stochastic optimization. Stochastic Models in Operations Research (1984) II(McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York) Google Scholar
  • Johnson N. L., Kotz S., Kemp A. W.Univariate Discrete Distributions (1992) 2nd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kok G. A., Fisher M. L. Demand estimation and assortment optimization under substitution: Methodology and application. Oper. Res. (2007) 55:1001–1021LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lariviere M. A., Porteus E. L. Stalking information: Bayesian inventory management with unobserved lost sales. Management Sci. (1999) 45(3):346–363LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman S. A., McCardle K. F. The competitive newsboy. Oper. Res. (1997) 45(1):54–65LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lovejoy W. S. Myopic policies for some inventory models with uncertain demand distributions. Management Sci. (1990) 36(6):724–738LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lu X., Song J. S., Zhu K. On “The censored newsvendor and the optimal acquisition of information”. Oper. Res. (2005) 53(6):1024–1026LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lu X., Song J. S., Zhu K. Analysis of perishable inventory systems with censored data. Oper. Res. (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan S., van Ryzin G., Tayur S., Ganeshan R., Magazine M. Retail inventories and consumer choice. Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) 491–551CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan S., van Ryzin G. Stocking retail assortments under dynamic consumer substitution. Oper. Res. (2001a) 49(3):334–351LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan S., van Ryzin G. Inventory competition under dynamic consumer choice. Oper. Res. (2001b) 49(5):646–657LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nahmias S., Smith S. A. Optimizing inventory levels in a two-echelon retailer system with partial lost sales. Management Sci. (1994) 40(5):582–596LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nauman M. Buyers line up and wait for the Toyota gas-electric hybrid. Mercury News (2004) August 26):1c–2cSan Jose, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Netessine S., Rudi N. Centralized and competitive inventory models with demand substitution. Oper. Res. (2003) 51(2):329–335LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Noonan P. S. When customers choose: A multi-product, multi-location newsboy model with substitution. (1995) . Working paper, Emory University, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  • Parlar M. Game theoretic analysis of the substitutable product inventory problem with random demands. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. (1988) 35(3):397–409CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parlar M., Goyal S. K. Optimal ordering decisions for two substitutable products with stochastic demand. OPSEARCH (1984) 21(1):1–15Google Scholar
  • Rajaram K., Tang C. S. The impact of product substitution on retail merchandising. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2001) 135(3):582–601CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scarf H. E. Bayes solution of the statistical inventory problem. Ann. Math. Statist. (1959) 30:490–508CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith S. A., Agrawal N. Management of multi-item retail inventory system with demand substitution. Oper. Res. (2000) 48(1):50–64LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Q., Parlar M. A three-person game theory model arising in stochastic inventory control theory. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1994) 76(1):83–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.