Inventory Service-Level Agreements as Coordination Mechanisms: The Effect of Review Periods

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1070.0188

References

  • Banerjee A., Paul A. Average fill rate and horizon length. Oper. Res. Lett. (2005) 33(5):525–530CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bendoly A., Donohue K., Schultz K. Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions. J. Oper. Management (2006) 24(6):747–752Google Scholar
  • Ben-Zion U., Cohen Y., Peled R., Shavit T. Decision-making and the newsvendor problem—An experimental study. (2007) . Working paper. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er-Sheva, IsraelGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton G., Katok E. Learning-by-doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. (2007) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Bostian A. J., Holt C. A., Smith A. M. The newsvendor “pull-to-center effect:” Adaptive learning in a laboratory experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. (2007) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G., Graves S., de Kok T. Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management (2003) (North Holland, Amsterdam) 229–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C. F.Behavioral Game Theory Experiments in Strategic Interactions (2003) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Chen J., Lin D., Thomas D. On the item fill-rate for a finite horizon. Oper. Res. Lett. (2003) 31(2):119–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goeree J. K., Holt C. A. An explanation of anomalous behavior in models of political participation. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (2005) 99(2):201–213CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogarth R.Judgement and Choice (1987) 2nd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kagel J. H., Roth A. E.Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47:263–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A.Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kay E. Ways to measure supplier performance. (2005) . Purchasing.com. http://www.purchasing.com/article/CA508544.html?industryid=2161&nid=2419Google Scholar
  • Keser C., Paleologo G. Experimental investigation of retailer-supplier contracts: The wholesale price contract. (2004) . Working Paper 2004s-57, CIRANO, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  • Lurie N. H., Swaminathan J. M. Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on performance and knowledge acquisition. (2007) . Working paper, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NCGoogle Scholar
  • McKay M. D., Beckman R. J., Conover W. J. A comparison of three method for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics (1979) 21(2):239–245Google Scholar
  • Rapoport A. A study of human control in a stochastic multistage decision task. Behavioral Sci. (1966) 11:18–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rapoport A. Variables affecting decisions in a multistage inventory task. Behavioral Sci. (1967) 12:194–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schweitzer M., Cachon G. Decision bias in the newsvendor problem: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. (2000) 46(3):404–420LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Selten R., Stoeker R. End behavior in sequences of finite prisoners' dilemma supergames: A learning theory approach. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1986) 7:47–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spengler J. J. Vertical integration and antitrust policy. J. Political Econom. (1950) 58(4):347–352CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S. E., Fiske S. T. Point of view and perceptions of causality. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1975) 32:439–445CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas D. Measuring item fill rate performance in a finite horizon. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2005) 7(1):74–80LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psych. (1973) 5:207–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.