Bounded Rationality in Newsvendor Models

References

• Anderson S. P., de Palma A., Thisse J. F.Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (1992) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson S. P., Goeree J. K., Holt C. A. Noisy directional learning and the logit equilibrium. Scandinavian J. Econom. (2004) 106(3):581–602Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendoly E., Donohue K., Schultz K. Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions. J. Oper. Management (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Ben-Zion U., Cohen Y., Peled R., Shavit T. Decision-making and the newsvendor problem—An experimental study. (2005) . Working paper, Ben Gurion University of the Neger, IsraelGoogle Scholar
• Binmore K., Samuelson L. Muddling through: Noisy equilibrium selection. J. Econom. Theory (1997) 74:235–265Crossref, Google Scholar
• Block H. D., Marschak J., Olkin I. Random ordering and stochastic theories of response. Contributions to Probability and Statistics (1960) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) 97–132Google Scholar
• Blume L. E. The statistical mechanics of strategic interaction. Games Econom. Behav. (1993) 5:387–424Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton G. E., Katok E. Learning-by-doing in the newsvendor problem. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) . ePub ahead of print January 25, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.1060.0190Google Scholar
• Bostian J. A., Holt C. A., Smith A. M. The newsvendor “pull-to-center effect”: Adaptive learning in a laboratory experiment. (2007) . Working paper, University of Virginia, CharlottesvilleGoogle Scholar
• Cachon G. P., Graves S., de Kok T. Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management (2003) (Elsevier Publishing Company, Boston) 229–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon G. P., Lariviere M. Supply chain coordination with revenue sharing: Strengths and limitations. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):30–44Link, Google Scholar
• Chen H. C., Friedman J. W., Thisse J. F. Boundedly rational Nash equilibrium: A probabilistic choice approach. Games Econom. Behav. (1997) 18:32–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen J., Yao D. D., Zheng S. Optimal replenishment and rework with multiple unreliable supply sources. Oper. Res. (2001) 49(3):430–443Link, Google Scholar
• Conlisk J. Why bounded rationality? J. Econom. Literature (1996) 34(2):669–700Google Scholar
• Croson R., Donohue K. Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Management Sci. (2006) 52(3):323–336Link, Google Scholar
• Croson R., Donohue K., Katok E., Sterman J. Order stability in supply chains: Coordination risk and the role of coordination stock. (2005) . Working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
• Dada M., Petruzzi N. C., Schwarz L. B. A newsvendor's procurement problem when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Eppen G. D. Effects of centralization on expected costs in a multi-location newsboy problem. Management Sci. (1979) 25(5):498–501Link, Google Scholar
• Geigerenzer G., Selten R.Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Gerchak Y., Mossman D. On the effect of demand randomness on inventories and cost. Oper. Res. (1992) 40(4):804–807Link, Google Scholar
• Gino F., Pisano G. Toward a theory of behavioral operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) . ePub ahead of print March 11, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.1070.0205Google Scholar
• Hofbauer J., Sandholm W. On the global convergence of stochastic fictitious play. Econometrica (2002) 70:2265–2294Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlin S., Arrow K., Karlin S., Scarf H. One stage inventory models with uncertainty. Studies in the Mathematical Theory of Inventory and Production (1958) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) 109–134Google Scholar
• Katok E., Wu D. Contracting in supply chains: A laboratory investigation. (2006) . Working paper, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkGoogle Scholar
• Keser C., Paleologo G. Experimental investigation of retailer-supplier contracts: The wholesale price contract. (2004) . Working paper, IBM Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NYGoogle Scholar
• Kok A. G., Shang K. H. Inspection and replenishment policies for systems with inventory record inaccuracy. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Lee H. L., Yano C. A. Lot sizing with random yields: A review. Oper. Res. (1995) 43(2):311–334Link, Google Scholar
• Lee H. L., Padmanabhan V., Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):546–558Link, Google Scholar
• Loch C. H., Wu Y. Behavioral operations management. Foundations Trends Tech. Inform. Oper. Management (2007) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Luce R. D.Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis (1959) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Lurie N. H., Swaminathan J. M. Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on performance and knowledge acquisition. (2005) . Working paper, Georgia Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
• McFadden D., Manski C. F., McFadden D. Econometric models of probabilistic choice. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications (1981) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 198–272Google Scholar
• McKelvey R. D., Palfrey T. R. Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games Econom. Behav. (1995) 10:6–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pasternack B. A. Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(2):166–176Link, Google Scholar
• Porteus E. L.Foundations of Stochastic Inventory Theory (2002) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rong Y., Shen Z. J., Snyder L. V. The impact of ordering behavior on order-quantity variability: A study of forward and reverse bullwhip effects. (2006) . Working paper, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
• Rubinstein A.Modeling Bounded Rationality (1998) (MIT Press, Cambrige, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweitzer M. E., Cachon G. P. Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. (2000) 46(3):404–420Link, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. (1955) 69(1):99–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A.Models of Bounded Rationality (1982) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Sterman J. D. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making environment. Management Sci. (1989) 35(3):321–339Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor T. Coordination under channel rebates with sales effort effect. Management Sci. (2002) 48(8):992–1007Link, Google Scholar
• Thurstone L. L. A law of comparative judgment. Psych. Rev. (1927) 34:273–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tomlin B., Wang Y. On the value of mix flexibility and dual sourcing in unreliable newsvendor networks. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2005) 7(1):37–57Link, Google Scholar
• Tsay A. Quantity-flexibility contract and supplier-customer incentives. Management Sci. (1999) 45(10):1339–1358Link, Google Scholar
• Tsay A. Managing retail channel overstock: Markdown money and return policies. J. Retailing (2001) 77:457–492Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185:1124–1131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5(4):297–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu Y., Loch C. H. Social preferences and supply chain performance: An experimental study. (2007) . Working paper, National University of SingaporeGoogle Scholar
• Young P. The evolution of conventions. Econometrica (1993) 61:57–84Crossref, Google Scholar