Toward a Theory of Behavioral Operations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1070.0205

References

  • Aranda J., Easterbrook S. Anchoring and adjustment in software estimation. Eur. Software Engrg. Conf./ACM SIGSOFT Sympos. Foundations of Software Engrg. (ESEC/FSE'05) (2005) Sept. 5–9Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  • Arkes H. R., Blumer C. B. The psychology of sunk cost. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1985) 33:124–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aronson E., Wilson T. D., Akert R. M.Social Psychology (2004) 5th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Bazerman M. H.Judgement in Managerial Decision Making (2005) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bendoly E., Donohue K., Schulz K. Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions. J. Oper. Management (2006) 24(6):737–752CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton G. E., Katok E. Learning-by-doing in the newsvendor problem a laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback. Manafacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) . ePub ahead of print January 25, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.1060.0190Google Scholar
  • Botti S., Iyengar S. S. The psychological pleasure and pain of choosing: When people prefer choosing at the cost of subsequent satisfaction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2004) 87:312–326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau J., Hopp W., McClain J. O., Thomas L. J. On the interface between operations and human resources management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2003) 5(3):179–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bowman E. H. Consistency and optimality in managerial decision making. Management Sci. (1963) 9(2):310–321LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C. F. Behavioral economics: Reunifying psychology and economics. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA (1999) 96(19):10575–10577CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C. F., Lovallo D. Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89(1):306–318CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Croson R., Donohue K. Experimental economics and supply chain management. Interfaces (2002) 32:74–82LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Croson R., Donohue K. Behavioral causes of the bullwhip and the observed value of inventory information. Management Sci. (2006) 52(3):323–336LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeHoratius N., Raman A. Inventory record inaccuracy: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. (Forthcoming) Google Scholar
  • Dubra J. Optimism and overconfidence in search. Rev. Econom. Dynam. (2004) 7(1):198–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. Group and organizational influences on team learning. (1996) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(4):350–383CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ford D., Sterman J. D. Dynamic modeling of product development processes. System Dynam. Rev. (1998) 14(1):31–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ford D., Sterman J. D. Overcoming the 90% syndrome: Iteration management in concurrent development projects. Concurrent Engrg.: Res. Appl. (2003a) 11(3):177–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ford D., Sterman J. D. The Liar's Club: Concealing rework in concurrent development. Concurrent Engrg. (2003b) 11(3):211–219CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ford H.Today and Tomorrow (1926) (Productivity Press, Portland, OR) Google Scholar
  • Garland H. Throwing good money after bad: The effect of sunk costs on the decision to escalate commitment to an ongoing project. J. Appl. Psych. (1990) 75(6):728–731CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbreth F. B., Gilbreth L. M. Process charts and their place in management. Mech. Engrg. (1922) 70:38–41Google Scholar
  • Gilovich T., Griffin D., Kahneman D.Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (2002) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayes R., Wheelwright S., Clark K.Dynamic Manufacturing (1988) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Heath C. Escalation and de-escalation of commitment to sunk costs: The role of budgeting in mental accounting. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1995) 62:38–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heath C., Larrick R. P., Klayman J. Cognitive repairs: How organizational practices can compensate for individual shortcomings. Res. Organ. Behav. (1998) 20:1–37Google Scholar
  • Iyengar S., Lepper M. R. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2000) 79:995–1006CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahn B. E., Wansink B. The influence of assortment structure on perceived variety and consumption quantities. J. Consumer Res. (2004) 30:519–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D. Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2003) 93(5):1449–1475CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kloppenborg T. J., Opfer W. A. Forty years of project management research: Trends, interpretations, and predictions. Project management research at the turn of the millennium. Proc. PMI Res. Conf. 2000 (2000) June 21–24Paris, France:41–59Google Scholar
  • Kok A. G., Shang K. H. Inspection and replenishment policies for systems with inventory record inaccuracy. Manafacturing Service Oper. Management (2006) 9:185–205LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Laibson D. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 62:443–477CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loch C. H., Kavadias S. Dynamic portfolio selection of NPD programs using marginal returns. Management Sci. (2002) 48(10):1227–1241LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G., Prelec D.Choices Over Time (1992) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lucas R. E. Expectations and the neutrality of money. J. Econom. Theory (1972) 4:103–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mussweiler T., Strack F. The semantics of anchoring. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2001) 86(2):234–255CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Odean T. Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? J. Finance (1998) 53(5):1775–1798CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Odean T. Do investors trade too much? Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89:1279–1298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olsen R. Implications of herding behavior. Financial Analysts J. (1996) 52(4):37–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oskamp S. The relationship of clinical experience and training methods to several criteria of clinical prediction. Psych. Monographs: General Appl. (1962) 76:1–28Google Scholar
  • Oskamp S. Overconfidence in case-study judgments. J. Consulting Psych. (1965) 29:261–265CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Piasecki D. J.Inventory Accuracy: People, Processes and Technology (2003) (Ops Publishing, Kenosha, WI) Google Scholar
  • Raman A., DeHoratius N., Ton Z. Execution: The missing link in retail operations. California Management Rev. (2001) 43:136–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ratner R., Kahn B. E. Private vs. public consumption: The impact of impression management on variety seeking. J. Consumer Res. (2002) 29:246–257CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ratner R., Kahn B. E., Kahneman D. Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. J. Consumer Res. (1999) 26:1–15CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Repenning N., Sterman J. D. Capability traps and self-confirming attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:265–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross L., Nisbett R. E.The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology (1991) (Temple University Press, Philadelphia) Google Scholar
  • Schweitzer M. E., Cachon G. P. Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. (2000) 46:404–420LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shapira Z.Organizational Decision Making (1997) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Shefrin H.Beyond Greed and Fear: Understanding Behavioral Finance and the Psychology of Investing (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Shewhart W. A.Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product (1931) (Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Shiller R. J. Stock prices and social dynamics. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity (1984) 2:457–498CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shleifer A.Inefficient Markets. An Introduction to Behavioral Finance (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psych. Rev. (1956) 63:129–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H.Models of Man (1957) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Simon H. A.Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (1976) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Starr M., Buffa Elwood S. Evolving concepts in production management. Readings in Production and Operations Management (1966) (John Wiley, New York) 28–35Google Scholar
  • Sterman J. D. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Sci. (1989a) 35:321–339LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sterman J. D. Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1989b) 43(3):301–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swamidass P. M. Empirical science: New frontier in operations management research. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16(4):793–814Google Scholar
  • Thaler R. H. Towards a positive theory of consumer choice. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1980) 1:39–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R. H. From homo economicus to homo sapiens. J. Econom. Perspectives (2000) 14(1):133–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson L. L.The Social Psychology of Organizational Behavior (2003) (Psychology Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185:1124–1131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watson N., Zheng Y.-S. Adverse effects of the over-estimation of the permanence of new demand levels in subjective and quantitative decision making. (2007) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
  • Weiss H. J., Gershon M. E.Production and Operations Management (1989) (Allyn and Bacon, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.