Newsvendor “Pull-to-Center” Effect: Adaptive Learning in a Laboratory Experiment

References

• Arifovic J., Ledyard J. O. Computer testbeds for mechanism design. (2005) . Discussion paper, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
• Barrett G. F., Donald S. G. Consistent tests for stochastic dominance. Econometrica (2003) 71:71–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellemare C., Krause M., Kroger S., Zhang C. Myopic loss aversion, information dissemination, and the equity premium puzzle. (2004) . Working paper 04-28, Laval University, Quebec, CanadaGoogle Scholar
• Bolton G. E., Katok E. Learning-by-doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. (2008) 10(3):519–538Link, Google Scholar
• Camerer C. F., Anderson C. M. Experience-weighted attraction learning in sender-receiver signaling games. Econom. Theory (2000) 16:689–718Google Scholar
• Camerer C. F., Ho T.-H. Experienced-weighted attraction learning in normal-form games. Econometrica (1999) 67:837–874Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R., Donohoe K. Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Management Sci. (2006) 52:323–336Link, Google Scholar
• Erev I., Rapoport A. Coordination, “magic,” and reinforcement learning in a market entry game. Games Econom. Behav. (1998) 23:146–175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fellner G., Sutter M. Causes, consequences, and cures of myopic loss aversion—An experimental investigation. Econom. J. (2008) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Gneezy U., Kapteyn A., Potters J. Evaluation periods and asset prices in a market experiment. J. Finance (2003) 58:821–837Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goeree J. K., Holt C. A. An explanation of anomalous behavior in models of political participation. Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev. (2005) 99:201–213Google Scholar
• Haigh M. S., List J. A. Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis. J. Finance (2005) 60:523–534Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho T.-H., Camerer C. F., Chong J.-K. Self-tuning experience weighted attraction learning in games. J. Econom. Theory (2007) 133:177–198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langer T., Weber M. Does commitment or feedback influence myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis. (2005) . Working paper, Department of Banking and Finance, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Lurie N. H., Swaminathan J. M. The effect of feedback frequency on performance and knowledge acquisition. (2007) . Working paper, College of Management, Georgia State University, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
• Schweitzer M. E., Cachon G. P. Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. (2000) 46:404–420Link, Google Scholar
• Slonim R., Roth A. E. Learning in high stakes ultimatum games: An experiment in the Slovak Republic. Econometrica (1998) 66:569–596Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler R. H., Tversky A., Kahneman D., Schwartz A. The effect of myopia and loss aversion on risk taking: An experimental test. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 112:647–661Crossref, Google Scholar