Second Sourcing vs. Sole Sourcing with Capacity Investment and Asymmetric Information

References

• Andersson B. GM's global supply footprint. The Supplier Industry Transition: The New Geography Auto Production (2006) April 18–19ChicagoGoogle Scholar
• Anton J. J., Yao D. A. Second sourcing and the experience curve: Price competition in defense procurement. RAND J. Econom. (1987) 18(1):57–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagnoli M., Bergstrom T. Log-concave probability and its applications. Econom. Theory (2005) 26(2):445–469Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian R., Padhi A. The next wave in US offshoring. McKinsey Quart. (2005) FebruaryGoogle Scholar
• Barnes E., Dai J., Deng S., Down D., Goh M., Lau H. C., Sharafali M. Electronics manufacturing service industry. (2000) . White paper, Georgia Institute of Technology and National University of SingaporeGoogle Scholar
• Birou L., Fawcett S. E., Magnan G. M. Integrating product life cycle and purchasing life cycle. Internat. J. Purchasing Materials Management (1997) 33(1):23–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloomberg News Ford to nearly double purchase of China-made parts. New York Times (2006) October 27Google Scholar
• Cachon G., Zhang F. Procuring fast delivery: Sole sourcing with information asymmetry. Management Sci. (2006) 52(6):881–896Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon G., Zhang F. Obtaining fast service in a queueing system via performance-based allocation of demand. Management Sci. (2007) 53(3):408–420Link, Google Scholar
• Carbone J. What buyers look for in contract manufacturers. Purchasing (2000) 12832–33, 36, 38Google Scholar
• Carbone J. Cutting cost is key in consumer electronics: Buyers at electronics manufacturing service providers are handling more sourcing responsibility in consumer electronics. Purchasing.com. (2005) . http://www.purchasing.com/article/CA6283579.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Carson P. Handset vendors and component suppliers: “Symbiotic relationship” with exposure for both parties. RCRWireless News (2007) . http://www.rcrnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070728/SUB/70727017/1003/FREEGoogle Scholar
• Chen F. Auctioning supply contracts. Management Sci. (2007) 53(10):1562–1576Link, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta S. Competition for procurement contracts and underinvestment. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1990) 31(4):841–865Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deng S.-J., Elmaghraby W. J. Supplier selection via tournaments. Production Oper. Management (2005) 14(2):252–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H. How Chrysler created an American keiretsu. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74(4):42–53Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H. Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):535–556Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H.Collaborative Advantage: Winning Through Extended Enterprise Supplier Networks (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Einhorn B. A new contender in the chip race. Business Week (2004) . http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_17/b3880080.htmGoogle Scholar
• Elmaghraby W. J. Supply contract competition and sourcing policies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2(4):350–371Link, Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby W. J., Oh S.-K. Procurement auctions and eroding price contracts in the presence of learning by doing. (2004) . Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
• Fine C., Clair R. St., Lafrance J., Hillebrand D.Meeting the Challenge: U.S. Industry Faces the 21st Century—The U.S. Automobile Manufacturing Industry (1996) (U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Technology Policy, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Gottfredson M., Puryear R., Phillips S. Strategic sourcing: From periphery to the core. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2005) 132–139Google Scholar
• Gray J., Tomlin B., Roth A. The effect of learning and strategic behavior on manufacturing outsourcing decisions. (2005) . Working paper, Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
• Helper S. How much has really changed between U.S. automakers and their suppliers? Sloan Management Rev. (1991) 32(4):15–28Google Scholar
• Klotz D., Chatterjee K. Dual sourcing in repeated procurement competitions. Management Sci. (1995) 41(8):1317–1327Link, Google Scholar
• Laffont J.-J., Tirole J. Repeated auctions of incentive contracts, investment and bidding parity, with an application to takeovers. RAND J. Econom. (1988) 19:516–537Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont J.-J., Tirole J.A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation (1993) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Lester T. Making it safe to rely on a single partner. Financial Times (2002) April 1Google Scholar
• Lewis T., Yildirim H. Managing dynamic competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(4):779–797Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liker J., Choi T. Building deep supplier relationships. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82(12):104–113Google Scholar
• Lyon T. Does dual sourcing lower procurement costs? J. Indust. Econom. (2006) 54(2):223–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maurer A., Dietz F., Lang N. Beyond cost reduction: Reinventing the automotive OEM-supplier interface. (2004) . The Boston Consulting Group, BostonGoogle Scholar
• McCracken J. Ford seeks big savings by overhauling supply system. Wall Street J. (2005) September 29):A1Google Scholar
• Microsoft Annual Report. (2005) . Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WAGoogle Scholar
• Monczka R., Trent R., Handfield R.Purchasing and Supply Chain Management (2005) 3rd ed.(South-Western College Pub., Cincinnati) Google Scholar
• Myerson R. Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. (1981) 6(1):58–73Link, Google Scholar
• Pyke D. F., Johnson M. E., Harrison T. P., Lee H. L., Neale J. J. Sourcing strategy and supplier relationships—Alliances versus eProcurement. The Practice of Supply Chain Management (2003) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) 77–90chap. 5Google Scholar
• Riordan M. H. Contracting with qualified suppliers. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1996) 37(1):115–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riordan M. H., Sappington D. E. M. Second sourcing. RAND J. Econom. (1989) 20(1):41–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rob R. The design of procurement contracts. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(3):378–389Google Scholar
• Rosling K. Inventory cost rate functions with nonlinear shortage costs. Oper. Res. (2002) 50(6):1007–1017Link, Google Scholar
• Sako M.Prices, Quality, and Trust (1992) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seifert R. W., Thonemann U. W., Hausman W. H. Optimal procurement strategies for online spot markets. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2004) 152(3):781–799Crossref, Google Scholar
• Serel D. A., Dada M., Moskowitz H. Sourcing decisions with capacity reservation contracts. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2001) 131(3):635–648Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence A. M. Entry, capacity, investment and oligopolistic pricing. Bell J. Econom. (1977) 8(2):534–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stole L. Information expropriation and moral hazard in optimal second-source auctions. J. Public Econom. (1994) 54:463–484Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swinney R., Netessine S. Long-term contracts under the threat of supplier default. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2009) 11(1):109–127Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor T., Plambeck E. Supply chain relationships and contracts: The impact of repeated interaction on capacity investment and procurement. Management Sci. (2007) 53(10):1577–1593Link, Google Scholar
• Ulrich K., Eppinger S.Product Design and Development (2004) (McGraw Hill/Irwin, New York) Google Scholar
• Visteon Purchase and supply agreement between Visteon Corporation and Ford Motor Company. (2003) . http://www.secinfo.com/dsvR3.1dj.d.htmGoogle Scholar
• Wu D. J., Kleindorfer P. R., Zhang J. E. Optimal bidding and contracting strategies for capital-intensive goods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2002) 137(3):657–676Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yelle L. E. The learning curve: Historical review and comprehensive survey. Decision Sci. (1979) 10:302–328Crossref, Google Scholar