Independence of Capacity Ordering and Financial Subsidies to Risky Suppliers

References

• Anupindi R., Akella R. Diversification under supply uncertainty. Management Sci. (1993) 39(8):944–963Link, Google Scholar
• Babich V. Vulnerable options in supply chains: Effects of supplier competition. Naval Res. Logist. (2006) 53(7):656–673Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babich V., Burnetas A. N., Ritchken P. H. Competition and diversification effects in supply chains with supplier default risk. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2007) 9(2):123–146Link, Google Scholar
• Bennett J., Haywood K. Struggling American Axle gets GM assist. Wall Street J., Eastern Edition (2009) August 19):B2Google Scholar
• Bharath S. T., Shumway T. Forecasting default with the Merton Distance to Default Model. Rev. Financial Stud. (2008) 21(3):1339–1369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black F., Scholes M. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Political Econom. (1973) 81:637–654Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briys E., de Varenne F. Valuing risky fixed rate debt: An extension. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1997) 32:239–248Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ciarrallo F. W., Akella R., Morton T. E. A periodic review, production planning model with uncertain capacity and uncertain demand—Optimality of extended myopic policies. Management Sci. (1994) 40(3):320–332Link, Google Scholar
• Dada M., Petruzzi N. C., Schwarz L. B. A newsvendor's procurement problem when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2007) 9(1):9–32Link, Google Scholar
• Fama E. F., French K. R. Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt. Rev. Financial Stud. (2002) 15(1):1–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folland G. B.Real Analysis. Modern Techniques and Their Applications (1984) (Wiley-Interscience, New York) Google Scholar
• Henig M., Gerchak Y. The structure of periodic review policies in the presence of variable yield. Oper. Res. (1990) 38(4):634–643Link, Google Scholar
• Heyman D., Sobel M. J.Stochastic Models in Operations Research (2004) 2(Dover, Mineola, New York) Google Scholar
• Jennings D. The best law X 4 X far? Supply Management (2002) 7(6):40–41Google Scholar
• Leary M. T., Roberts M. R. Do firms rebalance their capital structures? J. Finance (2005) 60(6):2575–2619Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee H. L., Padmanabhan V., Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):546–558Link, Google Scholar
• Leland H. E. Corporate debt value, bond covenants, and optimal capital structure. J. Finance (1994) 49(4):1213–1252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leland H. E., Toft K. B. Optimal capital structure, endogenous bankruptcy and the term structure of credit spreads. J. Finance (1996) 51(3):987–1019Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lester T. Making it safe to rely on a single partner. Financial Times (2002) April 1):7Google Scholar
• Merton R. C. On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates. J. Finance (1974) 29:449–470Google Scholar
• Modigliani F., Miller M. The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1958) 48:261–297Google Scholar
• Nussel P., Sherefkin R. Plastech bankruptcy could shut all of Chrysler. Automotive News (2008) February 4). http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080204/OEM/302049890Google Scholar
• Parlar M., Wang Y., Gerchak Y. A periodic review inventory model with Markovian supply availability. Internat. J. Production Econom. (1995) 42(2):131–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pliska S. R.Introduction to Mathematical Finance: Discrete Time Models (1997) (Blackwell Publishers, Ltd., Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Snyder L. V., Daskin M. S., Murray A., Grubesic T. H. Models for reliable supply chain network design. Reliability and Vulnerability in Critical Infrastructure: A Quantitative Geographic Perspective (2006) (Springer, Berlin) Advances in Spatial Science SeriesGoogle Scholar
• Swinney R., Netessine S. Long-term contracts under the threat of supplier default. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2009) 11(1):109–127Link, Google Scholar
• Tomlin B. T. On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply-chain disruption risks. Management Sci. (2006) 52(5):639–657Link, Google Scholar
• Tomlin B. T., Snyder L. V. On the value of a threat advisory system for managing supply chain disruptions. (2006) . Working paper, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
• Tomlin B. T., Wang Y. On the value of mix flexibility and dual sourcing in unreliable newsvendor networks. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2005) 7(1):37–57Link, Google Scholar
• Vidal C. J., Goetschalckx M. Modeling the effect of uncertainties on global logistics systems. J. Bus. Logist. (2000) 21(1):95–120Google Scholar
• Welch I. Capital structure and stock returns. J. Political Econom. (2004) 112(1):106–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Welch I. A first course in finance. (2005) . In development. Brown University, http://welch.econ.brown.edu/book/Google Scholar
• White J. Ford to pay up to $1.8b on Visteon. Wall Street Journal (2005) May 26):A3Google Scholar
• Yang Z., Aydin G., Babich V., Beil D. Supply disruptions, asymmetric information, and a dual sourcing option. (2008) . Working paper, Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
• Yang Z., Aydin G., Babich V., Beil D. Supply disruptions, asymmetric information, and a backup production option. Management Sci. (2009) 55(2):192–209Link, Google Scholar
• Zhou C. A jump-diffusion approach to modeling credit risk and valuing defaultable securities. (1997) . Finance and Economics Discussion Paper Series 1997/15, Board of Governors of Federal Reserve SystemGoogle Scholar