Do Random Errors Explain Newsvendor Behavior?

References

• Arkes H. Cost and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing. Psych. Bull. (1991) 110(3):486–498Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton G. E., Katok E. Learning-by-doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation of the role of the experience and feedback. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(3):519–538Link, Google Scholar
• Bostian A. J., Holt C., Smith A. The newsvendor “pull-to-center effect”: Adaptive learning in a laboratory experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(4):590–608Link, Google Scholar
• Camerer C. F., Hogarth R. M. The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. J. Risk Uncertainty (1999) 19(1):7–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goeree J. K., Holt C. A. An explanation of anomalous behavior in models of political participation. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (2005) 99(2):201–213Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haile P. A., Hortacsu A., Kosenok G. On the empirical content of quantal response equilibrium. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2008) 98(1):180–200Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hey J. D., Orme C. Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica (1994) 62(6):1291–1326Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lurie N. H., Swaminathan J. M. Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2009) 108(1):315–329Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweitzer M. E., Cachon G. P. Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. (2000) 46(3):404–420Link, Google Scholar
• Su X. Bounded rationality in newsvendor models. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(4):566–589Link, Google Scholar
• Thaler R. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1980) 1(1):39–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Slovic P., Kahneman D. The causes of preference reversal. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(1):204–217Google Scholar