The Role of Component Commonality in Product Assortment Decisions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1100.0317

References

  • Bernstein F., DeCroix G., Wang Y. Incentives and commonality in a decentralized multiproduct assembly system. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(4):630–646LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Terwiesch C., Xu Y. Retail assortment planning in the presence of consumer search. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2005) 7(4):330–346LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Desai P., Kekre S., Radhakrishnan S., Srinivasan K. Product differentiation and commonality in design: Balancing revenue and cost drivers. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):37–51LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fine C., Freund R. Optimal investment in product-flexible manufacturing capacity. Management Sci. (1990) 36(4):449–466LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gaur V., Honhon D. Product variety and inventory decisions under a locational consumer choice model. Management Sci. (2006) 52(10):1528–1543LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heese S., Swaminathan J. Product line design with component commonality and cost reduction effort. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2006) 8(2):206–219LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Holmes S. Nike. BusinessWeek Online (2003) . http://zdnet.businessweek.com/magazine/content/03_47/b3859634.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Hopp W., Xu X. Product line selection and pricing with modularity in design. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2005) 7(3):172–187LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kahn B. Dynamic relationships with customers: High-variety strategies. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1998) 26(1):45–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kök A. G., Fisher M. Demand estimation and assortment optimization under substitution: Methodology and application. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(6):1001–1021LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kök A. G., Fisher M., Vaidyanathan R., Agrawal N., Smith S. A. Assortment planning: Review of literature and industry practice. Retail Supply Chain Management (2008) (Springer, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H., Tang C. Modeling the costs and benefits of delayed production differentiation. Management Sci. (1997) 43(1):40–53LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ramdas K., Fisher M., Ulrich K. Managing variety for assembled products: Modeling component systems sharing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2003) 5(2):142–156LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith S., Agrawal N. Management of multi-item retail inventory systems with demand substitution. Oper. Res. (2000) 48(1):50–64LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Song J-S., Zhao Y. The value of commonality in a dynamic inventory system with lead times. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2009) 11(3):493–508LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Song J-S., Zipkin P., de Kok A. G., Graves S. Supply chain operations: Assemble-to-order systems. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 11. Supply Chain Management (2003) (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 561–596Google Scholar
  • Van Mieghem J. Investment strategies for flexible resources. Management Sci. (1998) 44(8):1071–1078LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van Mieghem J. Commonality strategies: Value drivers and equivalence with flexible capacity and inventory substitution. Management Sci. (2004) 50(3):419–424LinkGoogle Scholar
  • van Ryzin G., Mahajan S. On the relationship between inventory costs and variety benefits in retail assortment. Management Sci. (1999) 45(11):1496–1509LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.