Turning Waste into By-Product

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1110.0352

References

  • Atasu A., Guide V. D. R., Van Wassenhove L. N. Product reuse economics in closed-loop supply chain research. Production Oper. Management (2008a) 17(5):483–496CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atasu A., Sarvary M., Van Wassenhove L. N. Remanufacturing as a marketing strategy. Mangement Sci. (2008b) 54(10):1731–1746LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baumgartner S., Jost F. Joint production, externalities, and the regulation of production networks. Environ. Resource Econom. (2000) 16(2):229–251CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bitran G. R., Gilbert S. M. Co-production processes with random yields in the semiconductor industry. Oper. Res. (1994) 42(3):476–491LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bitran G. R., Leong T.-Y. Deterministic approximations to co-production problems with service constraints and random yields. Management Sci. (1992) 38(5):724–742LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bulow J. I., Geanakoplos J. D., Klemperer P. D. Multimarket oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and complements. J. Political Econom. (1985) 93(3):488–511CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Z., Ross T. W. Markets linked by rising marginal costs: Implications for multimarket contact, recoupment, and retailatory entry. Rev. Indust. Organ. (2007) 31(1):1–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chertow M. R. Industrial symbiosis: Literature and taxononmy. Annual Rev. Energy Environment (2000) 25:313–337CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chertow M. R., Lombardi D. R. Quantifying economic and environmental benefits of co-located firms. Environ. Sci. Tech. (2005) 39(17):6535–6541CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Debo L. G., Toktay L. B., Van Wassenhove L. N. Market segmentation and product technology selection for remanufacturable products. Management Sci. (2005) 51(8):1193–1205LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrenfeld J., Gertler N. Industrial ecology in practice: The evolution of interdependence at Kalundborg. J. Indust. Ecology (1997) 1(1):67–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferguson M. E., Toktay L. B. The effect of competition on recovery strategies. Production Oper. Management (2006) 15(3):351–368CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferrer G., Swaminathan J. M. Managing new and remanufactured products. Management Sci. (2006) 52(1):15–26LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleischmann M., Bloemhof-Ruwaard J. M., Dekker R., van der Laan E., van Nunen J. A., Van Wassenhove L. N. Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 103(1):1–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forward G., Mangan A. By-product synergy. The Bridge (1999) 29(1):12–15Google Scholar
  • Guide V. D. R., Teunter R. H., Van Wassenhove L. N. Matching demand and supply to maximize profits from remanufacturing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2003) 5(4):303–316LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guide V. D. R., Souza G. C., Van Wassenhove L. N., Blackburn J. D. Time value of commercial product returns. Management Sci. (2006) 52(8):1200–1214LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu A., Bassok Y. Random yield and random demand in a production system with downward substitution. Oper. Res. (1999) 47(2):277–290LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jayaraman V., Patterson R. A., Erik R. The design of reverse distribution networks: Models and solution procedures. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2003) 150(2):128–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee D., Toffel M. W., Gordon R. Cook Composites and Polymers Co.. (2009) . Case 9-608-055, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Majumder P., Groenevelt H. Competition in remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10(2):125–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Industrial Symbiosis Programme (2011) . http://www.nisp.org.ukGoogle Scholar
  • National Slag Association CemStarsm process: Slag usage raises productivity, operational efficiency, lowers emissions. (2011) . CemStar Technical Bulletin NSA 201-1. http://www.nationalslag.org/archive/nsa_201-1_cemstar_technical_bulletin.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Savaskan R. C., Bhattacharya S., Van Wassenhove L. N. Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):239–252LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Toffel M. W. The growing strategic importance of end-of-life product management. California Management Rev. (2003) 45(3):102–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tomlin B., Wang Y. Pricing and operational recourse in coproduction systems. Management Sci. (2008) 54(3):522–537LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tripsas M. Technology, identity, and inertia: Through the lens of “the digital photography company”. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(2):441–460LinkGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Business Council for Sustainable Development By-product synergy. (2011) . http://usbcsd.org/projects.phpGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency, and Renewal Energy Chemicals: Best practices plant-wide assessment case study. (2005) . U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyGuide for Industrial Waste Management (2011) (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC) . http://www.epa.gov/waste/nonhaz/industrial/guide/index.htmGoogle Scholar
  • van Beers D., Corder G., Bossilkov A., van Berkel R. Industrial symbiosis in the Australian mineral industry. J. Indust. Ecology (2007) 11(1):55–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang X. H. Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model. Econom. Lett. (1998) 60(1):55–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu Q., Lowe E. A., Wei Y.-A., Barnes D. A case study of the Guitang Group. J. Indust. Ecology (2007) 11(1):31–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.