Good and Bad News About the (S, T) Policy

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1110.0353

References

  • Ang M., Song J.-S., Wang M., Zhang H. Modularity and non-convexity of discrete batch-ordering inventory systems. (2011) . Working paper, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
  • Feller W.An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications (1968) II(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Fiorani F., Luciano E., Semeraro P. Single and joint default in a structural model with purely discontinuous asset prices. Quant. Finance (2010) 10(3):249–263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirsa A., Madan D. Pricing American options under variance gamma. J. Computational Finance (2003) 7(2):63–80Google Scholar
  • Lovász L., Bachem A., et al. Submodular functions and convexity. Mathematical Programmming: The State of the Art (1983) (Springer, New York) 235–257CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murota K.Discrete Convex Analysis (2003) (SIAM, Philadelphia) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao S. U. Properties of the periodic review (R, T) inventory control policy for stationary, stochastic demand. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2003) 5(1):37–53LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rausch M., Liao H. Joint production and spare part inventory control strategy driven by condition based maintenance. IEEE Trans. Reliability (2010) 59(3):507–516CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roundy R. O., Samorodnitsky G. Optimal and near-optimal (s, S) inventory policies for Levy demand processes. RAIRO–Oper. Res. (2001) 35(1):37–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaked M., Shanthikumar J. G. Stochastic convexity and its applications. Adv. Appl. Prob. (1988) 20:427–446CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaked M., Shanthikumar J. G.Stochastic Orders (2006) (Springer, New York) Springer Series in StatisticsGoogle Scholar
  • Topkis D. M.Supermodularity and Complementarity (1998) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Noortwijk J. M. A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (2009) 94(1):2–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.