A Laboratory Investigation of Rank Feedback in Procurement Auctions

References

• Bichler M., Kalagnanam J. Configurable offers and winner determination in multi-attribute auctions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2005) 160(2):380–394Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bichler M., Steinberg R. Introduction to the special issue on e-auctions for procurement operations. Production Oper. Management (2007) 16(4):401–403Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carare O., Rothkopf M. Slow Dutch auctions. Management Sci. (2005) 51(3):365–373Link, Google Scholar
• Carter C. R., Stevens C. K. Electronic reverse auction conguration and its impact on buyer price and supplier perceptions of opportunism: A laboratory experiment. J. Oper. Management (2007) 25(5):1035–1054Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter C. R., Kaufmann L., Beall S., Carter P. L., Hendrick T. E., Petersen K. J. Reserve auctions—Grounded theory from the buyer and supplier perspective. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. (2004) 4(3):229–254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cason T. N. An experimental investigation of the seller incentives in the EPA's emission trading auction. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1995) 85(4):905–922Google Scholar
• Chen-Ritzo C.-H., Harrison T. P., Kwasnica A. M., Thomas D. J. Better, faster, cheaper: An experimental analysis of a multiattribute reverse auction mechanism with restricted information feedback. Management Sci. (2005) 51(12):1753–1762Link, Google Scholar
• Compte O., Jehiel P. Auctions and information acquisition: Sealed bid or dynamic formats? RAND J. Econom. (2007) 38(1):355–372Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox J. C., Roberson B., Smith V. L. Theory and behavior in single object auctions. Res. Experiment. Econom. (1982) 2:1–43Google Scholar
• Cox J. C., Smith V. L., Walker J. M. Theory and individual behavior of first-price auctions. J. Risk and Uncertainty (1988) 1(1):61–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Easley R. F., Tenorio R. Jump bidding strategies in Internet auctions. Management Sci. (2004) 50(10):1407–1419Link, Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby W. Auctions within e-sourcing events. Production Oper. Management (2007) 16(4):409–422Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht-Wiggans R., Katok E. Regret in auctions: Theory and evidence. Econom. Theory (2007) 33(1):81–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht-Wiggans R., Katok E. Regret and feedback information in first-price sealed-bid auctions. Management Sci. (2008) 54(4):808–819Link, Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht-Wiggans R., Haruvy E., Katok E. A comparison of buyer-determined and price-based multiattribute mechanisms. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(5):629–641Link, Google Scholar
• Filiz-Ozbay E., Ozbay E. Y. Auctions with anticipated regret: Theory and experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2007) 97(4):1407–1418Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U. z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. (2007) 10(2):171–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallien J., Wein L. M. A smart market for industrial procurement with capacity constraints. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):76–91Link, Google Scholar
• Goeree J. K., Holt C. A., Palfrey T. R. Quantal response equilibrium and overbidding in private-value auctions. J. Econom. Theory (2002) 104(1):247–272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haruvy E., Katok E. Increasing revenue by decreasing information in procurement auctions. (2010) . Working paper, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkGoogle Scholar
• Haruvy E., Popkowski Leszczyc P. T. L. The impact of online auction duration. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(1):99–106Link, Google Scholar
• Holt C. A. Competitive bidding for contracts under alternative auction procedures. J. Political Econom. (1980) 88(3):435–445Google Scholar
• Isaac R. M., James D. Just who are you calling risk averse? J. Risk Uncertainty (2000) 20(2):177–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaac R. M., Salmon T. C., Zillante A. An experimental test of alternative models of bidding in ascending auctions. Internat. J. Game Theory (2005) 33(2):287–313Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaac R. M., Salmon T. C., Zillante A. A theory of jump bidding in ascending auctions. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2007) 62(1):144–164Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jap S. D. Online reverse auctions: Issues, themes, and prospects for the future. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2002) 30(4):506–525Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jap S. D. The impact of online reverse auction design on buyer-supplier relationships. J. Marketing (2007) 71(1):146–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kagel J. H. Auctions: A survey of experimental research. Handbook Experiment. Econom. (1995) 89(5):501–535Google Scholar
• Kagel J. H., Levin D. Independent private value auctions: Bidder behaviour in first-, second- and third-price auctions with varying numbers of bidders. Econom. J. (1993) 103(419):868–879Google Scholar
• Kagel J. H., Roth A. E.Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995) 1st ed.(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Kagel J. H., Harstad R. M., Levin D. Information impact and allocation rules in auctions with affiliated private values: A laboratory study. Econometrica (1987) 55(6):1275–1304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katok E., Kwasnica A. M. Time is money: The effect of clock speed on sellers' revenue in Dutch auctions. Experiment. Econom. (2008) 11(4):344–357Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koppius O. R., van Heck E. Information architecture and electronic market performance in multidimensional auctions. (2003) . Doctoral dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
• Kostamis D., Beil D. R., Duenyas I. Total-cost procurement auctions: Impact of suppliers' cost adjustments on auction format choice. Management Sci. (2009) 55(12):1985–1999Link, Google Scholar
• Krishna V.Auction Theory (2002) (Academic Press, San Diego) Google Scholar
• Kwasnica A. M., Katok E. The effect of timing on jump bidding in ascending auctions. Production Oper. Management (2007) 16(4):483–494Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lucking-Reiley D. Using field experiments to test equivalence between auction formats: Magic on the Internet. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89(5):1063–1080Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S., Jones J. L. Do auction parameters affect buyer surplus in e-auctions for procurement? Production Oper. Management (2007) 16(4):455–470Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neugebauer T., Selten R. Individual behavior of first-price auctions: The importance of information feedback in computerized experimental markets. Games Econom. Behav. (2006) 54(1):183–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ockenfels A., Selten R. Impulse balance equilibrium and feedback in first price auctions. Games Econom. Behav. (2005) 51(1):155–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parkes D. C., Kalagnanam J. Models for iterative multiattribute procurement auctions. Management Sci. (2005) 51(3):435–451Link, Google Scholar
• Parkes D. C., Ungar L. H. Iterative combinatorial auctions: Theory and practice. Proc. 17th Natl. Conf. Artificial Intelligence (2000) (Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Palo Alto, CA) 74–81Google Scholar
• Raviv Y. The role of the bidding process in price determination: Jump bidding in sequential English auctions. Econom. Inquiry (2008) 46(3):325–341Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth A. E., Ockenfels A. Last-minute bidding and the rules for ending second-price auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon auctions on the Internet. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(4):1093–1103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothkopf M. H. Decision analysis: The right tool for auctions. Decision Anal. (2007) 4(3):167–172Link, Google Scholar
• Rothkopf M. H., Whinston A. B. On e-auctions for procurement operations. Production Oper. Management (2007) 16(4):404–408Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sterman J. D. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Sci. (1989) 35(3):321–339Link, Google Scholar
• Sterman J. D.Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World (2000) (McGraw-Hill, Boston) Google Scholar
• Teich J. E., Wallenius H., Wallenius J., Koppius O. R. Emerging multiple issue e-auctions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2004) 159(1):1–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vickrey W. Counter speculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance (1961) 16(1):8–37Crossref, Google Scholar