Operational Compliance Levers, Environmental Performance, and Firm Performance Under Cap and Trade Regulation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1110.0357

References

  • American Electric Power Why SCRs at Gavin? (2003) . Accessed July 2010, http://web.archive.org/web/20060322114715/http://www.aep.com/environmental/emissioncontrol/cleanenergy/docs/gavinscr1.pptGoogle Scholar
  • Angell L. C., Klassen R. D. Integrating environmental issues into the mainstream: An agenda for research in operations management. J. Oper. Management (1999) 17(5):575–598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ball J. Wall Street shows skepticism over coal—Banks push utilities to plan for impact of emissions caps. Wall Street Journal (2008) February 4):A6Google Scholar
  • Baltagi B. H., Raj B. A survey of recent theoretical developments in the econometrics of panel data. Empirical Econom. (1992) 17(1):85–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Box G., Cox D. An analysis of transformations. J. Royal Statist. Soc.: Ser. B (1964) 26(2):211–264Google Scholar
  • Burtraw D., Mansur E. Environmental effects of SO2 trading and banking. Environment. Sci. Tech. (1999) 33(20):3489–3494CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burtraw D., Palmer K., Harrington W., Morgenstern R., Sterner T. SO2 cap-and-trade program in the United States: A “living legend” of market effectiveness. Choosing Environmental Policy: Comparing Instruments and Outcomes in the United States and Europe (2004) (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC) 41–67Google Scholar
  • Burtraw D., Evans D. A., Krupnick A., Palmer K., Toth R. Economics of pollution trading for SO2 and NOx. Annual Rev. Environment Resources (2005) 30:253–289CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burtraw D., Krupnick A., Mansur E., Austin D., Farrell D. Costs and benefits of reducing air pollutants related to acid rain. Contemporary Econom. Policy (1998) 16(4):379–401CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Business Wire PSI energy reaches settlement on environmental plan. (2005) December 14). http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20051214005614/en/PSI-Energy-Reaches-Settlement-Environmental-PlanGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Olivares M. Drivers of finished goods inventory performance in the U.S. automobile industry. Management Sci. (2010) 56(1):202–216LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Capon N., Farley J. U., Hoenig S. Determinants of financial performance: A meta-analysis. Management Sci. (1990) 36(10):1143–1159LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carlson C., Burtraw D., Cropper M., Palmer K. Sulfur dioxide control by electric utilities: What are the gains from trade? J. Political Econom. (2000) 108(6):1292–1326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEPR)Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). 2010. Accessed July 2010, http://web.mit.edu/ceepr/www/publications/emissions.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Chow G. C. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica (1960) 28(3):591–605CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M., Fenn S., Naimon J. Environmental and financial performance: Are they related? (1997) . Working paper, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TNGoogle Scholar
  • Colby B. Cap-and-trade policy challenges: A tale of three markets. Land Econom. (2000) 76(4):638–658CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett C. J., Klassen R. D. Extending the horizons: Environmental excellence as key to improving operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2006) 8(1):5–22LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett C. J., Kleindorfer P. R. Environmental management and operations management: Introduction to part 1 (manufacturing and eco-logistics). Production Oper. Management (2001) 10(2):107–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cramton P., Kerr S. Tradeable carbon permit auctions: How and why to auction not grandfather. Energy Policy (2002) 30(4):333–345CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dowell G., Hart S., Yeung B. Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Sci. (2000) 46(8):1059–1074LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Edison Electric Institute The financial crisis and its impact on the electric utility industry. (2009) . Accessed July 2010, http://www.eei.org/ourissues/finance/Documents/Financial_Crisis_and_Industry.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Ellerman A. D. Electric utility response to allowances: From autarkic to market-based compliance. (1998) . Report 98-009, MIT CEEPR, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Ellerman A. D. Ex post evaluation of tradable permits: The U.S. SO2 cap-and-trade program. (2003a) . Report 2003-003, MIT CEEPR, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Ellerman A. D. Lessons from phase 2 compliance with the U.S. Acid Rain Program. (2003b) . Report 2003-009, MIT CEEPR, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Ellerman A. D., Joskow P. L., Harrison D. Emissions trading in the U.S.: Experience, lessons, and considerations for greenhouse gases. Pew center on global climate change. (2003) . Accessed July 2010, http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/emissions_trading.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Ellerman A. D., Schmalensee R., Joskow P. L., Montero J. M., Bailey E. M. Emissions trading under the U.S. Acid Rain Program: Evaluation of compliance costs and allowance market performance. (1997) (MIT CEEPR, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Fischer C., Kerr S., Toman M. Using emissions trading to regulate U.S. greenhouse gas emissions: An overview of policy design and implementation issues. Natl. Tax J. (1998) 51(3):453–464Google Scholar
  • Gilley K. M., Worrell D. L., Davidson W. N., El-Jelly A. Corporate environmental initiatives and anticipated firm performance. J. Management (2000) 26(6):1199–1216CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W.Econometric Analysis (2003) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Han A. K., Park D. Testing for structural change in panel data: Application to a study of U.S. foreign trade in manufacturing goods. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1989) 71(1):135–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart S. L. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(4):986–1014CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart S. L., Ahuja G. Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Bus. Strategy Environment (1996) 5(1):30–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser J. R., Simmie P. Profit maximizing perceptual positions: An integrated theory for the selection of product features and price. Management Sci. (1981) 27(1):33–56LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hayashi P. M., Goo J. Y.-J., Chamberlain W. C. Vertical economies: The case of U.S. electric utility industry. Southern Econom J. (1997) 63(3):1983–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hennessy C. A. Tobin's q, debt overhang, and investment. J. Finance (2004) 59(4):1717–1742CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herzog H. J., Golomb D. Carbon capture and storage from fossil fuel use. Encyclopedia Energy (2004) 1:277–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ingebretsen M., Sweet W. SO2: Setting the best example. IEEE Spectrum (2003) 40(1):59–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobs B., Singhal V. R., Subramanian R. An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm. J. Oper. Management (2010) 28(5):430–441CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joskow P. L., Schmalensee R., Bailey E. M. The market for sulfur dioxide emissions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998) 88(4):669–685Google Scholar
  • Judd C. M., Kenny D. A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Eval. Rev. (1981) 5(5):602–619CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King A. A., Lenox M. J. Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. J. Indust. Ecology (2001) 5(1):105–116CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King A. A., Lenox M. J. Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Sci. (2002) 48(2):289–299LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klassen R. D., McLaughlin C. P. The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Sci. (1996) 42(8):1199–1214LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klassen R. D., Whybark D. C. The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(6):599–615CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kmenta J.Elements of Econometrics (1986) (MacMillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lindenberg E. B., Ross S. A. Tobin's q ratio and industrial organization. J. Bus. (1981) 54(1):1–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Linton J. D., Klassen R., Jayaraman V. Sustainable supply chains: An introduction. J. Oper. Management (2007) 25(6):1075–1082CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacKinnon D. P., Lockwood C. M., Hoffman J. M., West S. G., Sheets V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psych. Methods (2002) 7(1):83–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Majumdar S. K., Marcus A. A. Rules versus discretion: The productivity consequences of flexible regulation. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(1):170–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marcus A., Geffen D. The dialectics of competency acquisition: Pollution prevention in electric generation. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:1145–1168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Massari J. (2010) . Personal interview with James Kroes, July 26Google Scholar
  • McConnell J. J., Servaes H. Equity ownership and the two faces of debt. J. Financial Econom. (1995) 39(1):131–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKinnon J. D. Bush weighs range of emission caps. Wall Street Journal (2007) July 23):A8Google Scholar
  • Napolitano S., Schreifels J., Stevens G., Witt M., LaCount M., Forte R., Smith K. The U.S. Acid Rain Program: Key insights from the design, operation, and assessment of a cap-and-trade program. Electricity J. (2007) 20(7):47–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nolan P. S. Flue gas desulfurization technologies for coal-fired power plants. (2000) BR-1709. Presentation, Coal-Tech 2000 International ConferenceNovember 13–14(Babcock & Wilcox Company, Barberton, OH) Google Scholar
  • Porter M. E., van der Linde C. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J. Econom. Perspect. (1995) 9(4):97–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Requate T. Pollution control in a Cournot duopoly via taxes or permits. J. Econom. (1993) 58(3):255–291Google Scholar
  • Riley J. T.Routine Coal and Coke Analysis: Collection, Interpretation, and Use of Analytical Data (2007) (American Society for Testing Materials, West Conshohocken, PA) Google Scholar
  • Rooney C. Economics of pollution prevention: How waste reduction pays. Pollution Prevention Rev. (1993) 3(3):261–276Google Scholar
  • Rubin E. S., Taylor M. R., Yeha S., Hounshell D. A. Learning curves for environmental technology and their importance for climate policy analysis. Energy (2004) 29(9–10):1551–1559CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russo M. V., Fouts P. A. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 40(3):534–559CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith A. E., Platt J., Ellerman A. D. The costs of reducing utility SO2 emissions—Not as low as you might think. (1998) (MIT CEEPR, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Springer U., Varilek M. Estimating the price of tradable permits for greenhouse gas emissions in 2008–12. Energy Policy (2004) 32(5):611–621CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stavins R. N. What can we learn from the grand policy experiment? Lessons from SO2 allowance trading. J. Econom. Perspect. (1998) 12(3):69–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor R. Cap and trade. Risk Management (2009) 56(8):18–19Google Scholar
  • Taylor M., Rubin E., Hounshell D. Regulation as the mother of invention: The case of SO2 control. Law and Policy (2005) 27(2):348–378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Impacts of the Kyoto protocol on U.S. energy markets and economic activity. (1998) . Report SR/OIAF/98-03, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) International energy outlook: 2007. (2007a) . U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Residential electricity prices: A consumer's guide. Brochure DOE/EIA-X042. (2007b) . U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) EIA-767 data files. (2010) . U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC. Accessed June 2010, http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/eia767/Google Scholar
  • U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Electric power annual: Table ES1—Summary statistics for the United States, 1998 through 2009. (2011a) . U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC. Accessed June 2011, http://205.254.135.24/cneaf/electricity/epa/epates.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Electric power monthly February 2011. (2011b) . DOE/EIA-0226 (2011/02), U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final rule for 1998 reallocation of allowances. (1998) . 63 FR 51705. EPA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Clearing the air: The truth about capping and trading emissions. (2002) . EPA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air pollution control technology fact sheet. (2003) . EPA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Acid Rain Program: 2006 progress report. (2007) . EPA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Acid Rain Program SO2 allowances fact sheet. (2010a) . Accessed December 2010, http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/trading/factsheet.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Cap and trade around the globe. (2010b) . Accessed January 2010, http://www.epa.gov/captrade/international.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Technology transfer network: Clean air technology center—RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse. (2010c) . Accessed June 2010, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/catc/rblc/htm/welcome.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Clean air mercury rule. (2011) . Accessed June 2011, http://www.epa.gov/air/mercuryrule/Google Scholar
  • U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) FERC form 423 annual data: Monthly report of cost and quality of fuels for electric plants 2004. (2004) . FERC, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Walley N., Whitehead B. It's not easy being green. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1994) May–June):46–52Google Scholar
  • Yale Environment 360 Putting a price on carbon: An emissions cap or a tax? (2009) . May 7, http://e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2148Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.