Using a Dual-Sourcing Option in the Presence of Asymmetric Information About Supplier Reliability: Competition vs. Diversification

References

• Aydın G., Babich V., Beil D. R., Yang Z., Kouvelis P., Boyabatli O., Dong L., Li R. Decentralized supply risk management. Handbook of Integrated Risk Management in Global Supply Chains (2012) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 389–424Google Scholar
• Babich V. Independence of capacity ordering and financial subsidies to risky suppliers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2010) 12(4):583–607Link, Google Scholar
• Babich V., Burnetas A. N., Ritchken P. H. Competition and diversification effects in supply chains with supplier default risk. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2007) 9(2):123–146Link, Google Scholar
• Babich V., Aydın G., Brunet P.-Y., Keppo J., Saigal R., Gurnani H., Mehrotra A., Ray S. Risk, financing, and the optimal number of suppliers. Managing Supply Disruptions (2010) (Springer-Verlag, London) Google Scholar
• Baiman S., Fischer P. E., Rajan M. V. Information, contracting, and quality costs. Management Sci. (2000) 46(6):776–789Link, Google Scholar
• Beil D. R., Wein L. M. An inverse-optimization-based auction mechanism to support a multiattribute RFQ process. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1529–1545Link, Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi A., Martínez-de-Albéniz V. Optimal procurement design in the presence of supply risk. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2011) 13(2):227–243Link, Google Scholar
• Corbett C. Stochastic inventory systems in a supply chain with asymmetric information: Cycle stocks, safety stocks, and consignment stock. Oper. Res. (2001) 49(4):487–500Link, Google Scholar
• Dada M., Petruzzi N. C., Schwarz L. B. A newsvendor's procurement problem when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2007) 9(1):9–32Link, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta S., Spulber D. Managing procurement auctions. Inform. Econom. Policy (1989) 4(1):5–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economist, The After the quake. (2011) May 19). http://www.economist.com/node/18712767Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby W. J., Simchi-Levi D., Wu S., Shen Z. Auctions and pricing in emarketplaces. Handbook of Qantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modeling in the e-Business Era (2004) (Springer, New York) 213–245Chap 6Crossref, Google Scholar
• Federgruen A., Yang N. Optimal supply diversification under general supply risks. Oper. Res. (2009) 57(6):1451–1468Link, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Tirole J.Game Theory (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Gümüş M., Ray S., Gurnani H. Supply side story: Risks, guarantees, competition, and information asymmetry. Management Sci. (2012) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Gurnani H., Shi M. A bargaining model for a first-time interaction under asymmetric beliefs of supply reliability. Management Sci. (2006) 52(6):865–880Link, Google Scholar
• Hendricks K. B., Singhal V. R. The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth. J. Management (2003) 21(5):501–522Google Scholar
• Jap S. An exploratory study of the introduction of online reverse auctions. J. Marketing (2003) 67(3):96–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knapp S. Usual suspects. Los Angeles Daily J. (2004) January 12):4–6Google Scholar
• Kostamis D., Beil D., Duenyas I. Total-cost procurement auctions: Impact of suppliers' cost adjustments on auction format choice. Management Sci. (2009) 55(12):1985–1999Link, Google Scholar
• Laffont J.-J., Martimort D.The Theory of Incentives (2002) (Princeton University Press, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li C. Sourcing for supplier effort and competition. (2010) . Working paper, University of Connecticut, StorrsGoogle Scholar
• Lim W. S. Producer-supplier contracts with incomplete information. Management Sci. (2001) 47(5):709–715Link, Google Scholar
• Mookherjee D., Reichelstein S. Dominant strategy implementation of Bayesian incentive compatible allocation rules. J. Econom. Theory (1992) 56(2):378–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorthy K. S. Using game theory to model competition. J. Marketing Res. (1985) 22(3):262–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson R. B. Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica (1979) 47(1):61–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tomlin B. On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Sci. (2006) 52(5):639–657Link, Google Scholar
• Tomlin B. Impact of supply learning when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2009) 11(2):192–209Link, Google Scholar
• Tomlin B. T., Wang Y. On the value of mix flexibility and dual sourcing in unreliable newsvendor networks. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2005) 7(1):37–57Link, Google Scholar
• Tomlin B., Wang Y., Kouvelis P., Boyabatli O., Dong L., Li R. Operational strategies for managing supply chain disruption risk. Handbook of Integrated Risk Management in Global Supply Chains (2010) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 79–101Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau Statistics for industry groups and industries 2005. (2006) . Technical Report M05(AS)-1. Annual Survey of Manufactures. U.S. Census Bureau, Suitland, MDGoogle Scholar
• Wan Z., Beil D. R. RFQ auctions with supplier qualification screening. Oper. Res. (2009) 57(4):934–949Link, Google Scholar
• Wu Z., Choi T. Supplier–supplier relationships in the buyer–supplier triad: Building theories from eight case studies. J. Oper. Management (2005) 24(1):27–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Z. Supply risks and asymmetric information. (2009) . Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/64812Google Scholar
• Yang Z. B., Aydın G., Babich V., Beil D. R. Supply disruptions, asymmetric information, and a backup production option. Management Sci. (2009) 55(2):192–209Link, Google Scholar