Integrated Block Sharing: A Win–Win Strategy for Hospitals and Surgeons

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1110.0372

References

  • Dexter F., Macario A. Changing allocations of operating room time from a system based on historical utilization to one where the aim is to schedule as many surgical cases as possible. Anesthesia Analgesia (2002) 94(5):1272–1279CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dexter F., Ledolter J., Wachtel R. Tactical decision making for selective expansion of operation room resources incorporating financial criteria and uncertainty in subspecialties' future workloads. Anesthesia Analgesia (2005) 100(5):1424–1432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dexter F., Macario A., Traub R. D., Lubarsky D. A. Operating room utilization alone is not an accurate metric for the allocation of operating room block time to individual surgeons with low caseloads. Anesthesiology (2003) 98(5):1243–1249CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Houdenhaven M. V., van Oostrum J. M., Hans E. W., Wullink G., Kazemier G. Improving operating room efficiency by applying bin-packing and portfolio techniques to surgical case scheduling. Anesthesia Analgesia (2007) 105(3):707–714CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson R. L. The business of surgery: Managing the OR as a profit center requires more than just IT. It requires a profit-making mindset, too. Health Management Tech. (2002) 23(7):20–22Google Scholar
  • McKesson Corporation Achieving operating room efficiency through process integration. (2002) . Online report for the Healthcare Financial Management Association (HFMA), San Francisco. Accessed January 5, 2009, http://www.allbusiness.com/health-care-social-assistance/491677-1.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Spangler W. E., Strum D. P., Vargas L. G., May J. H. A minimal cost analysis model for utilization and capacity planning in surgical services. Internat. J. Healthcare Tech. Management (2000) 2(1–4):56–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strum D. P., Vargas L. V., May J. H. Surgical subspecialty block utilization and capacity planning: A minimal cost analysis model. Anesthesiology (1999) 90(4):1176–1185CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.