What Is Interesting in Operations Management?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1110.0375

References

  • Braess D. Uber ein paradoxen der verkehrsplanung. Unternehmensforschung (1968) 12:258–268Google Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Fisher M. Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information. Management Sci. (2000) 46(8):1032–1048LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Swinney R. Purchasing, pricing, and quick response in the presence of strategic consumers. Management Sci. (2009) 55(3):497–511LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Randall T., Schmidt G. M. In search of the bullwhip effect. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2007) 9(4):457–479LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Currie J., Walker R. Traffic congestion and infant health: Evidence from E-ZPass. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. (2011) 3(1):65–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dana J., Pettruzi N. Note: The newsvendor model with endogenous demand. Management Sci. (2001) 47(11):1488–1497LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davis M. S. That's interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philos. Soc. Sci. (1971) 1(2):309–344CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeHoratius N., Raman A. Inventory record inaccuracy: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. (2008) 54(4):627–641LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher M., Raman A. Reducing the cost of demand uncertainty through accurate response to early sales. Oper. Res. (1996) 44(1):87–99LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gallego G., van Ryzin G. Optimal dynamic pricing of inventories with stochastic demand over finite horizons. Management Sci. (1994) 40(8):999–1020LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Iyer A. V., Bergen M. E. Quick response in manufacturer-retailer channels. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):559–570LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jordan W. C., Graves S. C. Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility. Management Sci. (1995) 41(4):577–594LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Karmarkar N. A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming. Combinatorica (1984) 4(4):373–395CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lariviere M. A., Porteus E. L. Selling to the newsvendor: An analysis of price-only contracts. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2001) 3(4):293–305LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H. L., Padmanabhan V., Whang S. Information distortion in the supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):546–558LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt S. D., List J. A. Was there really a Hawthorne effect at the Hawthorne plant? An analysis of the original illumination experiments. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. (2011) 3(1):224–238CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porteus E. L. Investing in reduced setups in the EOQ model. Management Sci. (1985) 31(8):998–1010LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roundy R. 98%-Effective integer-ratio lot-sizing for one-warehouse multi-retailer systems. Management Sci. (1985) 31(11):1416–1430LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schweitzer M. E., Cachon G. P. Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. (2000) 46(3):404–420LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sterman J. D. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Sci. (1989) 35(3):321–339LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Su X. Intertemporal pricing with strategic customer behavior. Management Sci. (2007) 53(5):726–741LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Su X., Zhang F. Strategic customer behavior, commitment, and supply chain performance. Management Sci. (2008) 54(10):1759–1773LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van Mieghem J. A. Investment strategies for flexible resources. Management Sci. (1998) 44(8):1071–1078LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.