Information Hang-overs in Healthcare Service Systems

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1120.0381

References

  • Adcock K. A. Initiative to improve mammogram interpretation. Permanente J. (2004) 8(2):12–18Google Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Gao G., DesRoches C., Jha A. K. Research commentary—The digital transformation of healthcare: Current status and the road ahead. Inform. Systems Res. (2010) 21(4):796–809LinkGoogle Scholar
  • American College of Radiology (ACR) ACR practice guideline for the performance of screening and diagnostic mammography. (2008) . http://www.radrounds.com/page/acr-practice-guidelinesGoogle Scholar
  • Ayal M., Seidmann A. On the role of RIS/PACS in healthcare: An empirical study. Proc. 42nd Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2009a) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Ayal M., Seidmann A. An empirical investigation of the value of integrating enterprise information systems: The case of medical imaging informatics. J. Management Inform. Systems (2009b) 26(2):43–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banker R. D., Kauffman R. J. The evolution of research on information systems: A fiftieth-year survey of the literature in management science. Management Sci. (2004) 50(3):281–298LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E. The productivity paradox of information technology. Commun. ACM (1993) 36(12):67–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. (1996) 42(4):541–559LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Yang S. Information technology and productivity: A review of the literature. Adv. in Comput. (1996) 43:179–214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buzacott J. A. Commonalities in business processes: Models and issues. Management Sci. (1996) 42(5):768–782LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chesson E. Radiology is streamlining. Health Imaging & IT (2006) August 6)). http://www.healthimaging.com/index.php?option=com_articles&view=article&id=4719Google Scholar
  • Cotteleer M. J., Bendoly E. Order lead-time improvement following enterprise information technology implementation: An empirical study. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(3):643–660CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dedrick J., Gurbaxani V., Kraemer K. L. Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Comput. Surveys (2000) 35(1):1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denning J., Buzen P. The operational analysis of queueing network models. Comput. Surveys (1978) 10(3):225–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denning J., Medina-Mora R. Completing the loops. Interfaces (1995) 25(3):42–57LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Devaraj S., Kohli R. Information technology payoff in the health care industry: A longitudinal study. J. Management Inform. Systems (2000) 16(4):41–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dewan S., Kraemer K. L. International dimensions of productivity paradox. Commun. ACM (1998) 41(8):56–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dewan S., Min C. Substitution of information technology for other factors of production: A firm-level analysis. Management Sci. (1997) 43(12):1660–1675LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dobson G., Sainathan A. On the impact of analyzing customer information and prioritizing in a service system. Decision Support Systems (2011) 51(4):875–883CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobson G., Pinker E. J., van Horn R. L. Division of labor in medical office practices. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2009) 11(3):525–537LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Duerinckx A. J., Grant E. G. Cost of PACS and computed radiography in the United States. Radiology (1998) 208(2):554–555CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green L. V., Savin S., Wang B. Managing patient service in a diagnostic medical facility. Oper. Res. (2006) 54(1):11–25LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hasija S., Pinker E. J., Shumsky R. A. Staffing and routing in a two-tier call center. Internat. J. Oper. Res. (2005) 1(1–2):8–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holt N. F., Silverman D. G., Prasad R., Dziura J., Ruskin K. J. Preanesthesia clinics, information management, and operating room delays: Results of a survey of practicing anesthesiologists. Anesthesia and Analgesia (2007) 104(3):615–618CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt L. M., Wu D. J., Zhou X. Investment in enterprise resource planning: Business impact and productivity measures. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19(1):71–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jewkes E. A queueing analysis of priority-based scheduling rules for a single-stage manufacturing system with repair. IIE Trans. (1994) 26(4):80–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karmarkar U. S., Apte U. M. Operations management in the information economy: Information products, processes, and chains. J. Oper. Management (2007) 25(2):438–453CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King R. How Kaiser Permanente went paperless. BusinessWeek.com (2009) April 7). http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2009/tc2009047_562738Google Scholar
  • Koman R. Tech stimulus: $20B for health care records. ZDNet.com (2009) January 26). http://www.zdnet.com/blog/government/tech-stimulus-20b-for-health-care-records/4300Google Scholar
  • Lahiri A., Seidmann A. Analyzing the differential impact of radiology information systems across radiology modalities. J. Amer. College of Radiology (2009) 6(20):705–714CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lahiri A., Seidmann A. The hang-over effect in information-intensive service systems. Proc. 43rd Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2010) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lehr B., Lichtenberg F. Information technology and its impact on productivity: Firm-level evidence from government and private data sources 1977–1993. Canadian J. Econom. (1999) 32(2):335–362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lu L. X., van Mieghem J. A., Savaskan R. K. Incentives for quality through endogenous routing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2009) 11(2):254–273LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee A. The impact of enterprise information technology adoption on operational performance: An empirical investigation. Production Oper. Management (2002) 11(1):1–21Google Scholar
  • McAfee A.Pharmacy Service Improvement at CVS (2005) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • McKee K. 10 ways to work smarter. Medical Econom. (2004) 81(22):36–38Google Scholar
  • Menon N. M., Lee B., Eldenburg L. Productivity of information systems in the health-care industry. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(1):83–92LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mukhopadhyay T., Kekre S., Kalathur S. Business value of information technology: A study of electronic data interchange. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):137–156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell S. G. Specialization, teamwork, and production efficiency. Internat. J. Production Econom. (2000) 67(3):205–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reiner B. I., Siegel E. L., Carrino J. A. Workflow optimization: Current trends and future directions. J. Digital Imaging (2002) 15(3):141–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ruskin K. J. Anesthesia information management systems for the office practitioner. (2011) . Bulletin report, Institute for Safety in Office-Based Surgery, Boston. Accessed March 1, 2012, http://isobsurgery.org/?page_id=195Google Scholar
  • Seidmann A., Nof S. Y. Unitary manufacturing cell design with random product feedback flow. IIE Trans. (1985) 17(2):188–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seidmann A., Sundararajan A. The effects of task and information asymmetry on business process design. Internat. J. Production Econom. (1997) 50(2–3):117–128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shumsky R. A., Pinker E. J. Gatekeepers and referrals in services. Management Sci. (2003) 49(7):839–856LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Siegel E. L., Reiner B. I., Siddiqui K. M. Ten filmless years and ten lessons: A tenth anniversary retrospective from the Baltimore VA Medical Center. J. Amer. College of Radiology (2004) 1(11):824–833CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith P. C., Araya-Guerra R., Bublitz C., Parnes B., Dickinson L. M., van Vorst R., Westfall J. M., Pace W. D. Missing clinical information during primary care visits. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. (2005) 293(5):565–571CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srinivasan M., Liederman E., Baluyot N., Jacoby R. Saving time, improving satisfaction: The impact of a digital radiology system on physician workflow and system efficiency. J. Healthcare Inform. Management (2006) 20(2):123–131Google Scholar
  • Varian H. Economic scene; Information technology may have been what cured low service-sector productivity. New York Times (2004) February 12). http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/12/business/economic-scene-information-technology-may-have-been-what-cured-low-service.html?pagewanted=all&src=pmGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.