The Role of Modular Upgradability as a Green Design Strategy

References

• Agrawal V, Toktay LB (2009) Interdisciplinarity in closed-loop supply chain research. Ferguson ME, Souza GC, eds. Closed-Loop Supply Chains: New Developments to Improve the Sustainability of Business Practices (Taylor & Francis Publishing, Boca Raton, FL), 197–214.Google Scholar
• Agrawal V, Ferguson M, Toktay LB, Thomas V (2012) Is leasing greener than selling? Management Sci. 58(3):523–533.Link, Google Scholar
• Apple (2011) 15-Inch MacBook Pro: Environmental report. Report, Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA. Accessed March 13, 2011, http://images.apple.com/environment/reports/docs/MacBookPro_15-inch_Product_Environmental_Report_Oct2011.pdf.Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Subramanian R (2012) Extended producer responsibility for e-waste: Individual or collective producer responsibility? Production Oper. Management 21(6):1042–1059.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, Clark B (1997) Managing in the age of modularity. Harvard Bus. Rev. 75(5):84–93.Google Scholar
• Bras B (2009) Product design issues. Ferguson ME, Souza GC, eds. Closed-Loop Supply Chains: New Developments to Improve the Sustainability of Business Practices (Taylor & Francis Publishing, Boca Raton, FL), 39–66.Google Scholar
• Cisco (2009) Cisco corporate citizenship report. Report, Cisco, San Jose, CA. Accessed October 6, 2011, http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac227/csr2009/pdfs/CSR_09_Environment.pdf.Google Scholar
• Coase RH (1972) Durability and monopoly. J. Law Econom. 15(1):143–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MA, Eliashberg J, Ho T-H (1996) New product development: The performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Management Sci. 42(2):173–186.Link, Google Scholar
• Debo LG, Toktay LB, Van Wassenhove LN (2005) Market segmentation and product technology selection for remanufacturable products. Management Sci. 51(8):1193–1205.Link, Google Scholar
• Dell (2003) Creating a model for sustainability: Dell environmental report. Report, Dell, Round Rock, TX. Accessed November 11, 2011, http://i.dell.com/sites/content/corporate/environment/en/Documents/cr-report-2003.pdf.Google Scholar
• Economist, The (2011) Electronic waste: Garbage in, garbage out. Babbage (blog), April 24, http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2011/04/electronic_waste.Google Scholar
• EPEAT (2006) EPEAT criteria: Product longevity/life cycle extension. Accessed August 25, 2010, http://www.epeat.net/resources/criteria-discussion/pc-display-criteria/.Google Scholar
• Fishbein B, McGarry L, Dillon P (2000) Leasing: A step towards producer responsibility. Technical report, INFORM Inc., New York.Google Scholar
• Fishman A, Rob R (2000) Product innovation by a durable-good monopoly. RAND J. Econom. 31(2):237–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fixson SK (2007) Modularity and commonality research: Past developments and future opportunities. Concurrent Engrg.: Res. Appl. 15(2):85–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graedel TE, Allenby BR (1995) Industrial Ecology (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Greenpeace (2011) iPoison+iWaste. Accessed November 19, 2011, http://web.archive.org/web/20100826115725/http://www.greenpeace.org/apple/itox.html.Google Scholar
• Hewlett-Packard (2011) Product design for the environment. Accessed March 19, 2011, http://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-information/environment/design-for-environment.html.Google Scholar
• IBM (2010) Product stewardship. Accessed March 19, 2011, http://www.ibm.com/ibm/environment/products.Google Scholar
• Intel (2011) Intel server system product brief. Report, Intel, Santa Clara, CA. Accessed November 19, 2011, http://cache-www.intel.com/cd/00/00/41/40/414099_414099.pdf.Google Scholar
• Keoleian G, Menerey D (1993) Life Cycle Design Guidance Manual: Environmental Requirements and the Product System (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Kim H, Keoleian G, Horie Y (2006) Optimal household refrigerator replacement policy for life cycle energy, greenhouse gas emissions, and cost. Energy Policy 34(15):2310–2323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kornish LJ (2001) Pricing for a durable-goods monopolist under rapid sequential innovation. Management Sci. 47(11):1552–1561.Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Ramachandran K (2011) Integrated product architecture and pricing for managing sequential innovation. Management Sci. 57(11):2040–2053.Link, Google Scholar
• Kuehr R, Williams E (2003) Computers and the Environment: Understanding and Managing Their Impacts, Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science Series, Vol. 14 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lenox M, King A, Ehrenfeld J (2000) An assessment of design-for-environment practices in leading US electronics firms. Interfaces 30(3):83–94.Link, Google Scholar
• MacDonald E (2011) Seven cognitive principles for the design of sustainable products. Working paper, Iowa State University, Ames.Google Scholar
• Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (2010) Product design and the environment: Extending product life. Report, Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance, St. Paul. Accessed January 4, 2011, http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/view-document.html?gid=4678.Google Scholar
• Newcomb PJ, Bras B, Rosen DW (1996) Implications of modularity on product design for the life cycle. Proc. 1996 ASME Design Engrg. Tech. Conf. Comput. Engrg. Conf. (ASME, New York), 1–12.Google Scholar
• Plambeck EL, Denend L (2008) The greening of Wal-Mart. Stanford Soc. Innovation Rev. 6(2), http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/the_greening_of_wal_mart.Google Scholar
• Plambeck E, Wang Q (2009) Effects of e-waste regulation on new product introduction. Management Sci. 55(3):333–347.Link, Google Scholar
• Ramachandran K, Krishnan V (2008) Design architecture and introduction timing for rapidly improving industrial products. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(1):149–171.Link, Google Scholar
• Slade G (2006) Made to Break: Technology and Obsolescence in America (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Subramanian R, Ferguson M, Toktay LB (2012) Remanufacturing and the component commonality decision. Production Oper. Management. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Ülkü S, Schmidt G (2011) Matching product architecture and supply chain configuration. Production Oper. Management 20(1):16–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich K (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy 24(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2010) Resource conservation and eCycling: Buying green. Accessed March 19, 2011, http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/conserve/materials/ecycling/basic.htm.Google Scholar
• U.S. Office of Technology Assessment (1992) Green products by design: Choices for a cleaner environment. Technical report, U.S. Congress, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Whitney DE (2004) Mechanical Assemblies: Their Design, Manufacture, and Role in Product Development (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Williams E (2004) Environmental impacts in the production of personal computers. Kuehr R, Williams E, eds. Computers and the Environment: Understanding and Managing Their Impacts, Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science Series, Vol. 14 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), 41–72.Google Scholar
• Xerox (2010) Waste prevention and management: 2010 report on global citizenship. Report, Xerox Corporation, Norwalk, CT. Accessed March 19, 2011, http://www.xerox.com/corporate-citizenship-2010/sustainability/waste-prevention.html.Google Scholar