Salesforce Contracting Under Demand Censorship

References

• Agrawal V, Seshadri S. Impact of uncertainty and risk aversion on price and order quantity in the newsvendor problem. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2(4):410–423Link, Google Scholar
• Albers S, Mantrala M, Wierenga B. Models for sales management decisions. Handbook of Marketing Decision Models (2008) (Springer, Berlin) 163–210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson ET, Fitzsimons GJ, Simester D. Measuring and mitigating the costs of stockouts. Management Sci. (2006) 52(11):1751–1763Link, Google Scholar
• Basu A, Lal R, Srinivasan V, Staelin R. Salesforce compensation plans: An agency theoretic perspective. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(4):267–291Link, Google Scholar
• Bensoussan A, Çakanyıldırım M, Sethi SP. A multiperiod newsvendor problem with partially observed demand. Math. Oper. Res. (2007) 32(2):322–344Link, Google Scholar
• Chen F. Sales-force incentives and inventory management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2(2):186–202Link, Google Scholar
• Chen F. Salesforce incentives, market information, and production/inventory planning. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):60–75Link, Google Scholar
• Chen F, Xiao W. On compensation schemes for sales agents with superior market information. (2009) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Chen L, Plambeck EL. Dynamic inventory management with learning about the demand distribution and substitution probability. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management. (2008) 10(2):236–256Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Xiao W. Impact of reseller's forecasting accuracy on channel member performance. Production Oper. Management (2012) 21(6):1075–1089Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu LY, Sappington DE. Implementing high-powered contracts to motivate intertemporal effort supply. RAND J. Econom. (2009) 40(2):296–316Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding X, Puterman ML, Bisi A. The censored newsvendor and the optimal acquisition of information. Oper. Res. (2002) 50(3):517–527Link, Google Scholar
• Emmelhainz MA, Stock RJ, Emmelhainz LW. Consumer responses to retail stock-outs. J. Retailing (1991) 67(2):138–147Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ, Hart O. An analysis of the principal-agent problem. Econometrica (1983) 51(1):7–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruen TW, Corsten DS, Bharadwaj S. Retail out-of-stocks: A worldwide examination of extent, causes and consumer responses. The Food Institute Forum (2002) Google Scholar
• Heese HS, Swaminathan JM. Inventory and sales effort management under unobservable lost sales. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2010) 207(3):1263–1268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B. Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10(1):74–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hopp W, Iravani SMR, Liu Z. The role of wholesale-salespersons and incentive plans in promoting supply chain performance. (2010) . Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
• Innes RD. Limited liability and incentives contracting with ex-ante action choices. J. Econom. Theory (1990) 52(1):45–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jerath K, Netessine S, Zhang ZJ. Can we all get along? Incentive contracts to bridge the marketing and operations divide. (2010) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
• Jewitt I, Kadan O, Swinkels JM. Moral hazard with bounded payments. J. Econom. Theory (2008) 143(1):59–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson S. Product management and marketing survey. The Pragmatic Marketer (2010) 8(1):7–14Google Scholar
• Joseph K, Kalwani MU. The role of bonus pay in salesforce compensation plans. Indust. Marketing Management (1998) 27(2):147–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanjari N, Iravani S, Shin H. The impact of the manufacturer-hired sales agent on a supply chain with information asymmetry. (2012) . Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
• Kim SK. Limited liability and bonus contracts. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1997) 6(4):899–913Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lal R, Srinivasan V. Compensation plans for single- and multi-product salesforces: An application of the Holmström-Milgrom model. Management Sci. (1993) 39(7):777–793Link, Google Scholar
• Lal R, Staelin R. Salesforce compensation plans in environments with asymmetric information. Marketing Sci. (1986) 5(3):179–198Link, Google Scholar
• Lariviere MA, Porteus E. Stalking information: Bayesian inventory management with unobserved lost sales. Management Sci. (1999) 45(3):346–363Link, Google Scholar
• Lu X, Song JS, Zhu K. Analysis of perishable inventory systems with censored data. Oper. Res. (2006) 56(4):1034–1038Link, Google Scholar
• Oyer P. A theory of sales quotas with limited liability and rent sharing. J. Labor Econom. (2000) 18(3):405–426Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park ES. Incentive contracting under limited liability. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1995) 4(3):477–490Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petruzzi NC, Dada M. Pricing and the newsvendor problem: A review with extensions. Oper. Res. (1999) 47(2):183–194Link, Google Scholar
• Poblete J, Spulber D. The form of incentive contracts: Agency with moral hazard, risk neutrality and limited liability. RAND J. Econom. (2012) 43(2):215–234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raju JS, Srinivasan V. Quota-based compensation plans for multiterritory heterogeneous salesforces. Management Sci. (1996) 42(10):1454–1462Link, Google Scholar
• Rao R. Compensating heterogeneous salesforces: Some explicit solutions. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(4):319–341Link, Google Scholar
• Sappington D. Limited liability contracts between principal and agent. J. Econom. Theory (1983) 29(1):1–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schary PB, Christopher M. The anatomy of a stock-out. J. Retailing (1979) 55(2):59–70Google Scholar
• Zoltners A, Sinha P, Lorimer SE. Sales force effectiveness: A framework for researchers and practitioners. J. Personal Selling Sales Management (2008) 28(2):115–131Crossref, Google Scholar