Sustaining Technology Leadership Can Require Both Cost Competence and Innovative Competence

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2.1.1.23266

References

  • Arrow Kenneth J., Nelson R. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (1962) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 609–625CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arthur W. Brian. Increasing returns and the new world of business. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74(4):100–109Google Scholar
  • Bowen H. Kent, Clark Kim B., Holloway Charles A., Wheelwright Steven C. Chaparral Steel Company. The Perpetual Enterprise Machine (1994) (Oxford University Press, New York) 293–314Chapter 10Google Scholar
  • Bower Joseph, Christensen Clayton. Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1995) 73(1):43–53Google Scholar
  • Cohen Morris A., Eliashberg Jehoshua, Ho Teck-Hua. New product development: The performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Management Sci. (1996) 42(2):173–186Erratum given in Management Sci. 42(12) 1753-1755LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen Morris A., Eliashberg Jehoshua, Ho Teck-Hua. An anatomy of a decision-support system for developing and launching line extensions. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(1):117–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen Morris A., Whang Seungjin. Competing in product and service: A product life-cycle model. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):535–545LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen Wesley M., Levinthal Daniel A. Fortune favors the prepared firm. Management Sci. (1994) 40(2):227–251LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fine Charles, Freund Robert M. Optimal investment in product-flexible manufacturing capacity. Management Sci. (1990) 36(4):449–466LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Forward Gordon E. Commentary: today's lions in action. The Uneasy Allicance: Managing the Productivity-Technology Dilemma (1985) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) 111–114Google Scholar
  • Gabszewicz J. Jaskold, Thisse J. F. Price competition, quality and income disparities. J. Econom. Theory (1979) 20:340–359CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geroski P. A. What do we know about entry?. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1995) 13:421–440CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghemawat Pankaj. Market incumbency and technological inertia. Marketing Sci. (1991) Spring10:161–171LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbert Richard J., Newbery David M. G. Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1982) 72(3):514–526Google Scholar
  • Ha Albert, Porteus Evan L. Optimal timing of reviews in concurrent design for manufacturability. Management Sci. (1995) 41:1431–1447LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson Rebecca M., Clark Kim B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishnan Viswanathan, Eppinger Steven D., Whitney Daniel E. A model-based framework to overlap product development activities. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):437–451LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman Steven A., McCardle Kevin F. Does cheaper, faster, or better imply sooner in the timing of innovation decisions? Management Sci. (1987) 33(August):1058–1064LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman Steven A., McCardle Kevin F. Uncertain search: A model of search among technologies of uncertain values. Management Sci. (1991) 37(November):1474–1490LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Loch Christoph H., Christian Terwiesch. Communication and uncertainty in concurrent engineering. Management Sci. (1998) 44(8):1032–1048LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mamer John W., McCardle Kevin F. Uncertainty, competition, and the adoption of new technology. Management Sci. (1987) 33(2):161–177LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mansfield Edwin, Richard Brandenburg. The allocation, characteristics, and outcome of the firm's research and development portfolio: A case study. J. Bus. (1966) 39(4):447–464CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCardle Kevin F. Information acquisition and the adoption of new technology. Management Sci. (1985) 31(11):1372–1389LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moorthy K. Sridhar. Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(2):141–168LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano Gary, Wheelwright Steven. The new logic of high-tech R&D. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1995) 73(5):93–105Google Scholar
  • Prokesch Steven E. Mastering chaos at the high-tech frontier: An interview with Silicon Graphic's Ed McCracken. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1993) 71(6):134–144Google Scholar
  • Reinganum Jennifer F. Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1983) 73(4):741–748Google Scholar
  • Reinganum Jennifer F. Practical implications of game theoretic models of R & D. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1989) 74(2):61–66Google Scholar
  • Reinganum Jennifer F. Innovation and industry evolution. Quart. J. Econom. (1985) 100(February):81–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scherer F. M. Schumpeter and plausible capitalism. J. Econom. Literature (1992) 30(September):1416–1433Google Scholar
  • Schmidt Glen M.Competing in high-tech: The roles of innovative competence and cost competence (1998) (Grad. School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA) . Unpublished doctoral dissertationGoogle Scholar
  • Schumpeter Joseph. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (1942) (Harper & Brothers, New York) Google Scholar
  • Shaked Avner, Sutton John. Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Studies (1982) 49:3–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tirole Jean. The Theory of Industrial Organization (1988) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Tushman Michael L., Anderson Philip. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(September):439–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich Karl T., Scott Pearson. Assessing the importance of design through product archaeology. Management Sci. (1998) 44:352–369LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich Karl T., David Sartorius, Pearson Scott, Mark Jakiela. Including the value of time in design-for-manufacturing decision making. Management Sci. (1993) 39(4):429–447LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Utterback James M.Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Womack James P., Jones Daniel T., Daniel Roos. The Machine That Changed the World (1990) (HarperPerennial, New York) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.