Linking Cyclicality and Product Quality

References

• Aggarwal KK, Singh Y, Kaur A, Malhotra R. Investigating effect of design metrics on fault proneness in object-oriented systems. J. Object Tech. (2007) 6(10):127–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ajila SA, Wu D. Empirical study of the effects of open source adoption on software development economics. J. Systems Software (2007) 80(9):1517–1529Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen TJ. Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB. Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker SO, Ichino A. Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. Stata J. (2002) 2(4):358–377Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braha D, Bar-Yam Y. The statistical mechanics of complex product development: Empirical and analytical results. Management Sci. (2007) 53(7):1127–1145Link, Google Scholar
• Briand LC, Daly J, Wüst J. A unified framework for coupling measurement in object-oriented systems. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1999) 25(1):91–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Browning TR. Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: A review and new directions. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2001) 48(3):292–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burrows R, Ferrari FC, Lemos OAL, Garcia A, Taïani F. The impact of coupling on the fault-proneness of aspect-oriented programs: An empirical study. Proc. IEEE 21st Internat. Sympos. Software Reliability Engrg. (ISSRE) (2010) San Jose, CA:329–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabigiosu A, Camuffo A. Beyond the “mirroring” hypothesis: Product modularity and interorganizational relations in the air conditioning industry. Organ. Sci. (2012) 23(3):686–703Link, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK. Regression Analysis of Count Data (1998) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card DN, Agresti WW. Measuring software design complexity. J. Systems Software (1988) 8(3):185–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card DN, Glass RL. Measuring Software Design Quality (1990) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Cataldo M, Wagstrom P, Herbsleb JD, Carley KM. Identification of coordination requirements: Implications for the design of collaboration and awareness tools. Proc. ACM Conf. Comput.-Supported Cooperative Work (2006) (ACM, New York) 353–362Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chidamber S, Kemerer C. A metrics suite for object-oriented design. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1994) 20(6):476–493Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clarkson PJ, Simons C, Eckert C. Predicting change propagation in complex design. J. Mech. Design (2004) 126(5):788–797Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colfer L, Baldwin CY. The mirroring hypothesis: Theory, evidence and exceptions. (2010) . HBS Working Paper 10-058, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Cua KO, McKone KE, Schroeder RG. Relationships between implementation of TQM, JIT, and TPM and manufacturing performance. J. Oper. Management (2001) 19(6):675–694Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eppinger SD, Browning TR. Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications (2012) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eppinger SD, Whitney DE, Smith RP, Gebala DA. A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development. Res. Engrg. Design (1994) 6(1):1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman L. Centrality in social networks. Conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks (1979) 1(3):215–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuentes-Fuentes MM, Albacete-Sáez CA, Lloréns-Montes FJ. The impact of environmental characteristics on TQM principles and organizational performance. Omega (2004) 32(6):425–442Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giffin M, Weck OD, Bounova G, Keller R, Eckert C, Clarkson PJ. Change propagation analysis in complex technical systems. J. Mech. Design (2009) 131(8):081001-1–081001-14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gokpinar B, Hopp WJ, Iravani SMR. The impact of misalignment of organizational structure and product architecture on quality in complex product development. Management Sci. (2010) 56(3):468–484Link, Google Scholar
• Gould RJ. Graph Theory (1988) (Benjamin-Cummings, Menlo Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Harary F. Graph Theory (1969) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henry SM, Selig C. Predicting source-code complexity at the design stage. IEEE Software (1990) 7(2):36–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kan SH. Metrics and Models in Software Quality Engineering (1995) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Kataoka Y, Ernst MD, Griswold WG, Notkin D. Automated support for program refactoring using invariants. Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. Software Maintenance (2001) Florence, Italy:736–743Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klier T. From tail fins to hybrids: How Detroit lost its dominance of the U.S. auto market. Econom. Perspect. (2009) 33(2):2–17Google Scholar
• Kreft I, Leeuw Jd, Aiken L. The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models. Multivariate Behavioral Res. (1995) 30(1):1–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Eppinger SD, Whitney DE. A model-based framework to overlap product development activities. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):437–451Link, Google Scholar
• Li X, Hamblin DJ. The impact of performance and practice factors on UK manufacturing companies' survival. Internat. J. Production Res. (2003) 41(5):963–979Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A, Baldwin CY, Rusnak J. The impact of component modularity on design evolution: Evidence from the software industry. (2008) . HBS Working Paper 08-038, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• MacCormack A, Baldwin CY, Rusnak J. Exploring the duality between product and organizational architectures: A test of the “mirroring” hypothesis. Res. Policy (2012) 41(8):1309–1324Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A, Rusnak J, Baldwin CY. Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1015–1030Link, Google Scholar
• Martin RC. Agile Software Development (2002) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• McCabe T. A complexity measure. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1976) 2(4):308–320Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mens T, Tourwé T. A survey of software refactoring. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (2004) 30(2):126–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mihm J, Loch C, Huchzermeier A. Problem-solving oscillations in complex engineering projects. Management Sci. (2003) 49(6):733–750Link, Google Scholar
• Miller GA. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psych. Rev. (1956) 63(2):81–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mockus A, Fielding RT, Herbsleb J. A case study of open source software development: The Apache server. Proc. 22nd Internat. Conf. Software Engrg. (ICSE) (2000) Limerick, Ireland:263–272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohrman SA, Tenkasi RV, Edward EL, Ledford GE. Total quality management: Practice and outcomes in the largest US firms. Employee Relations (1995) 17(3):26–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parnas DL. On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Commun. ACM (1972) 15(12):1053–1058Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pich MT, Loch CH, Meyer AD. On uncertainty, ambiguity and complexity in project management. Management Sci. (2002) 48(8):1008–1023Link, Google Scholar
• Pinedo M, Sehasdri S, Zemel E. The Ford-Firestone case. (2000) . Teaching case, Stern School of Business, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata (2008) 2nd ed.(Stata Press, College Station, TX) Google Scholar
• Ramachandran K, Krishnan V. Design architecture and introduction timing for rapidly improving industrial products. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(1):149–171Link, Google Scholar
• Raudenbush S, Bryk A. Hierarchical Linear Models, Applications and Data Analysis Methods (2002) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Roberts JA, Hann I-H, Slaughter SA. Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):984–999Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P, Rubin D. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika (1983) 70(1):41–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sangal N, Jordan E, Sinha V, Jackson D. Using dependency models to manage complex software architecture. Proc. 20th Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conf. Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, Appl. (OOPSLA) (2005) (ACM, New York) 167–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharman DM, Yassine AA. Characterizing complex product architectures. Systems Engrg. (2004) 7(1):35–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw M, Garlan D. Software Architecture (1996) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Simon F, Steinbrückner F, Lewerentz C. Metrics based refactoring. Proc. 5th Eur. Conf. Software Maintenance and Reengineering (2001) Lisbon, Portugal:30–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA. The Sciences of the Artificial (1996) 3rd ed.(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Singer JD, Willett JB. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis (2003) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith RP, Eppinger SD. Identifying controlling features of engineering design iteration. Management Sci. (1997a) 43(3):276–293Link, Google Scholar
• Smith RP, Eppinger SD. A predictive model of sequential iteration in engineering design. Management Sci. (1997b) 43(8):1104–1120Link, Google Scholar
• Sosa ME, Browning T, Mihm J. Studying the dynamics of the architecture of software products. Proc. ASME Internat. Design Engrg. Tech. Conf. Comput. Inform. Engrg. Conf. (IDETC/CIE 2007) (2007a) (ASME, New York) 329–342Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sosa ME, Eppinger SD, Rowles CM. The misalignment of product architecture and organizational structure in complex product development. Management Sci. (2004) 50(12):1674–1689Link, Google Scholar
• Sosa ME, Eppinger SD, Rowles CM. A network approach to define modularity of components in product design. J. Mech. Design (2007b) 129(11):1118–1129Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sosa ME, Mihm J, Browning TR. Degree distribution and quality in complex engineered systems. J. Mech. Design (2011) 133(10):101008-1–101008-15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staats B. Unpacking team familiarity: The effects of geographic location and hierarchical role. Production Oper. Management (2012) 21(3):619–635Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevens WP, Myers GJ, Constantine LL. Structured design. IBM Systems J. (1974) 13(2):115–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steward DV. The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1981) 28(3):71–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tarjan R. Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms. SIAM J. Comput. (1972) 1(2):146–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Loch CH. Managing the process of engineering change orders: The case of the climate control system in automobile development. J. Product Innov. Management (1999) 16(2):160–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Loch CH, Meyer AD. Exchanging preliminary information in concurrent engineering: Alternative coordination strategies. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):402–419Link, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD. Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Ulrich KT. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy (1995) 24(3):419–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD. Product Design and Development (2012) 5th ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Vuong QH. Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica (1989) 57(2):307–333Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warfield JN. Binary matrices in system modeling. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics (1973) 3(5):441–449Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K. Social Network Analysis (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar