Pricing Time-Sensitive Services Based on Realized Performance

References

• Akan M, Ata B, Dana J. Revenue management by sequential screening. (2013) . Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
• Allon G, Federgruen A. Competition in service industries. Oper. Res. (2007) 55:37–55Link, Google Scholar
• Allon G, Bassamboo A, Gurvich I. “We will be right with you”: Managing customer expectations with vague promises and cheap talk. Oper. Res. (2011) 59:1382–1394Link, Google Scholar
• Armony M, Maglaras C. Contact center with a call-back option and real-time delay information. Oper. Res. (2004) 52:527–545Link, Google Scholar
• Armony M, Shimkin N, Whitt W. The impact of delay announcements in many-server queues with abandonments. Oper. Res. (2009) 57:66–81Link, Google Scholar
• Ata B, Olsen TL. Near-optimal dynamic lead-time quotation and scheduling under convex-concave customer delay costs. Oper. Res. (2009) 57:753–768Link, Google Scholar
• Baker K. Sequencing rules and due-date assignments in a job shop. Management Sci. (1984) 30:1093–1104Link, Google Scholar
• Bansal M, Maglaras C. Dynamic pricing when customers strategically time their purchase: Asymptotic optimality of a two-price policy. J. Revenue Pricing Management (2009a) 8:42–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal M, Maglaras C, Netessine S, Tang CS. Product design in a market with satisficing customers. Consumer-Driven Demand and Operations Models (2009b) (Springer, New York) 37–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohman R. A new twist in guaranteed LTL services. Logist. Management (2003) 42(10):23Google Scholar
• Boyaci T, Ray S. Product differentiation and capacity cost interaction in time and price sensitive markets. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2003) 5:18–36Link, Google Scholar
• Burnson R. Ocean cargo carrier performance gaps outlined in new report. Logist. Management (2012) July 18). http://www.logisticsmgmt.com/Google Scholar
• Çelik S, Maglaras C. Dynamic pricing and lead-time quotation for a multiclass make-to-order queue. Management Sci. (2008) 54:1132–1146Link, Google Scholar
• Charnsirisakskul K, Griffin PM, Keskinocak P. Pricing and scheduling decisions with leadtime flexibility. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2006) 171:153–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Frank M. State dependent pricing with a queue. IIE Trans (2001) 33:847–860Crossref, Google Scholar
• Courty P, Hao L. Sequential screening. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2000) 67:697–717Crossref, Google Scholar
• Debo L, Toktay LB, Van Wassenhove LN. Queuing for expert services. Management Sci. (2008) 54:1497–1512Link, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Mendelson H. User delay costs and internal pricing for a service facility. Management Sci. (1990) 36:1502–1517Link, Google Scholar
• Dobson G, Pinker EJ. The value of sharing lead time information. IIE Trans. (2006) 38:171–183Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duenyas I. Single facility due date setting with multiple customer classes. Management Sci. (1995) 41:608–619Link, Google Scholar
• Duenyas I, Hopp WJ. Quoting customer lead times. Management Sci. (1995) 41:43–57Link, Google Scholar
• Feng J, Liu L, Liu X. An optimal policy for joint dynamic price and lead-time quotation. Oper. Res. (2011) 59:1523–1527Link, Google Scholar
• Friedlander MC. Law and practice: Contractor marketing—Penalty clauses. (2001) . Retrieved September 2012, http://www.schiffhardin.com/binary/law_and_practice.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Gallego G, Sahin O. Revenue management with partially refundable fares. Oper. Res. (2010) 58:817–833Link, Google Scholar
• Guo P, Zipkin P. Analysis and comparison of queues with different levels of delay information. Management Sci. (2007) 53:962–970Link, Google Scholar
• Ha A. Incentive-compatible pricing for a service facility with joint production and congestion externality. Management Sci. (1998) 44:1623–1636Link, Google Scholar
• Ha A. Optimal pricing that coordinates queues with customer-chosen service requirements. Management Sci. (2001) 47:915–930Link, Google Scholar
• Harrison JM. A broader view of Brownian networks. Ann. Appl. Probab. (2003) 13:1119–1150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hassin R. Consumer information in markets with random product quality: The case of queues and balking. Econometrica (1986) 54:1185–1195Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hassin R. Decentralized regulation of a queue. Management Sci. (1995) 41:163–173Link, Google Scholar
• Hassin R, Haviv M. To Queue or Not to Queue: Equilibrium Behavior in Queueing Systems (2003) (Kluwer, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho T, Zheng Y. Setting customer expectation in service delivery: An integrated marketing-operations perspective. Management Sci. (2004) 50:479–488Link, Google Scholar
• Holt CA, Laury SK. Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92:1644–1655Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang T, Allon G, Bassamboo A. Bounded rationality in service systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2013) 15:263–279Link, Google Scholar
• Keskinocak P, Tayur S. Due date management policies. Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modeling in the eBusiness Era (2004) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) 485–554Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kittsteiner T, Moldovanu B. Priority auctions and queue disciplines that depend on processing time. Management Sci. (2005) 51:236–248Link, Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Randhawa R. Exploiting market size in service systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2010) 12:511–526Link, Google Scholar
• Landsberger M, Meilijson I. A general model of insurance under adverse selection. Econom. Theory (1999) 14:331–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Q, van Ryzin G. Strategic capacity rationing to induce early purchases. Management Sci. (2008) 54:1115–1131Link, Google Scholar
• Low D. Optimal dynamic pricing policies for an M/M/s queue. Oper. Res. (1974) 20:545–561Link, Google Scholar
• Maglaras C, Zeevi A. Pricing and design of differentiated services: Approximate analysis and structural insights. Oper. Res. (2005) 53:242–262Link, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H, Whang S. Optimal incentive-compatible priority pricing for the M/M/1 queue. Oper. Res. (1990) 38:870–883Link, Google Scholar
• Naor P. The regulation of queue size by levying tolls. Econometrica (1969) 37:15–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plambeck E. Optimal leadtime differentiation via diffusion approximations. Oper. Res. (2004) 52:213–228Link, Google Scholar
• Plambeck E, Kumar S, Harrison JM. Leadtime constraints in stochastic processing networks under heavy traffic conditions. Queueing Systems (2001) 39:23–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothschild M, Stiglitz JE. Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: An essay on the economics of imperfect information. Quart. J. Econom. (1976) 90:629–649Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shang W, Liu L. Promised delivery time and capacity games in time-based competition. Management Sci. (2011) 57:599–610Link, Google Scholar
• So KC, Song JS. Price, delivery time guarantees, and capacity selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1998) 111:28–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spearman ML, Zhang RQ. Optimal lead time policies. Management Sci. (1999) 45:290–295Link, Google Scholar
• Stiglitz JE. Monopoly, non-linear pricing and imperfect information: The insurance market. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1977) 44:407–430Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Mieghem JA. Price and service discrimination in queuing systems: Incentive compatibility of Gcμ scheduling. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1249–1267Link, Google Scholar
• Wein LM. Due-date setting and priority sequencing in a multiclass M/G/1 queue. Management Sci. (1991) 37:834–850Link, Google Scholar
• Whitt W. Improving service by informing customers about anticipated delays. Management Sci. (1999) 45:192–207Link, Google Scholar