Incentive-Compatible Revenue Management in Queueing Systems: Optimal Strategic Delay

References

• Afèche P. Incentive-compatible revenue management in queueing systems: Optimal strategic idleness and other delay tactics. (2004) . Working paper, University of Toronto, TorontoGoogle Scholar
• Afèche P. Revenue management and delay tactics under competition and customer choice. (2008) Presentation, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management ConferenceJune 5(University of Maryland, College Park, MD) Google Scholar
• Afèche P, Mendelson H. Pricing and priority auctions in queueing systems with a generalized delay cost structure. Management Sci. (2004) 50(7):869–882Link, Google Scholar
• Afèche P, Pavlin M. Optimal price-lead time menus for queues with customer choice: Priorities, pooling and strategic delay. (2011) . Working paper, University of Toronto, TorontoGoogle Scholar
• Allon G, Federgruen A. Competition in service industries with segmented markets. Management Sci. (2009) 55(4):619–634Link, Google Scholar
• Ata TL, Olsen M. Congestion-based leadtime quotation and pricing for revenue maximization with heterogeneous customers. Queueing Systems (2013) 73(1):35–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyaci T, Ray S. Product differentiation and capacity cost interaction in time and price sensitive markets. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2003) 5(1):18–36Link, Google Scholar
• Çelik S, Maglaras C. Dynamic pricing and lead-time quotation for a multiclass make-to-order queue. Management Sci. (2008) 54(6):1132–1146Link, Google Scholar
• Coffman EG, Mitrani I. A characterization of waiting time performance realizable by single-server queues. Oper. Res. (1980) 28(3):810–821Link, Google Scholar
• Cui T, Chen Y, Shen ZM. Revenue-maximizing pricing, scheduling, and probabilistic admission control for queues under information asymmetry. (2012) . Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
• Debo L, Toktay LB, Van Wassenhove LN. Queuing for expert services. Management Sci. (2008) 54(8):1497–1512Link, Google Scholar
• Federgruen A, Groenevelt H. Characterization and optimization of achievable performance in general queueing systems. Oper. Res. (1988) 36(5):733–741Link, Google Scholar
• Hassin R, Haviv M. To Queue or Not to Queue (2003) (Kluwer, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hopp WJ, Iravani SMR, Yuen GY. Operations systems with discretionary task completion. Management Sci. (2007) 53(1):61–77Link, Google Scholar
• Hsu VN, Xu SH, Jukic B. Optimal scheduling and incentive compatible pricing for a service system with quality of service guarantees. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2009) 11(3):375–396Link, Google Scholar
• Jayaswal S, Jewkes E, Ray S. Product differentiation and operations strategy in a capacitated environment. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2011) 210(3):716–728Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanet JJ, Sridharan V. Scheduling with inserted idle time: Problem taxonomy and literature review. Oper. Res. (2000) 49(1):99–110Link, Google Scholar
• Katta A, Sethuraman J. Pricing strategies and service differentiation in queues—A profit maximization perspective. (2005) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Lederer PJ, Li L. Pricing, production, scheduling and delivery-time competition. Oper. Res. (1997) 45(3):407–420Link, Google Scholar
• Maglaras C, Zeevi A, Srikant R, Voulgaris G. Pricing and performance analysis for a system with differentiated services and customer choice. Proc. 41st Annual Allerton Conf. on Communication, Control, and Comput. (2003) Allerton, ILGoogle Scholar
• Maglaras C, Zeevi A. Pricing and design of differentiated services: Approximate analysis and structural insights. Oper. Res. (2005) 53(2):242–262Link, Google Scholar
• Maglaras C, Yao J, Zeevi A. Revenue maximization in queues via service differentiation. (2013) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Mendelson H, Whang S. Optimal incentive-compatible priority pricing for the M/M/1 queue. Oper. Res. (1990) 38(5):870–883Link, Google Scholar
• Mussa M, Rosen S. Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory (1978) 18(2):301–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson RB. Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. (1981) 6(1):58–73Link, Google Scholar
• Naor P. On the regulation of queue size by levying tolls. Econometrica (1969) 37(1):15–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plambeck E. Optimal leadtime differentiation via diffusion approximations. Oper. Res. (2004) 52(2):213–228Link, Google Scholar
• Rao S, Petersen ER. Optimal pricing of priority services. Oper. Res. (1998) 46(1):46–56Link, Google Scholar
• Rochet J, Chonè P. Ironing, sweeping, and multidimensional screening. Econometrica (1998) 66(4):783–826Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stidham S. Analysis, design and control of queueing systems. Oper. Res. (2002) 50(1):197–216Link, Google Scholar
• Su X, Zenios S. Recipient choice can address the efficiency-equity trade-off in kidney transplantation: A mechanism design model. Management Sci. (2006) 52(11):1647–1660Link, Google Scholar
• Van Mieghem JA. Price and service discrimination in queuing systems: Incentive compatibility of Gcμ scheduling. Management Sci. (2000) 46(9):1249–1267Link, Google Scholar
• Yahalom T, Harrison JM, Kumar S. Designing and pricing incentive compatible grades of service in queueing systems. (2006) . Working Paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Zhao X, Stecke KE, Prasad A. Lead time and price quotation mode selection: Uniform or differentiated? Production Oper. Management (2012) 21(1):177–193Crossref, Google Scholar