Ordering Behavior Under Supply Risk:An Experimental Investigation

References

• Anderson JC, Thomson JBL, Wynstra F (2000) Combining value and price to make purchase decisions in business markets. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 17(4):307–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, de Palma A, Thisse JF (1992) Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babich V, Burnetas AN, Ritchken PH (2007) Competition and diversification effects in supply chains with supplier default risk. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(2):123–146.Link, Google Scholar
• Becker-Peth M, Katok E, Thonemann UUW (2013) Designing buyback contracts for irrational but predictable newsvendors. Management Sci. 59(8):1800–1816.Link, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Thaler RH (2001) Naive diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(1): 79–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendoly E, Croson R, Goncalves P, Schultz K (2010) Bodies of knowledge for research in behavioral operations. Production Oper. Management 19(4):434–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Zion U, Cohen Y, Peled R, Shavit T (2008) Decision-making and the newsvendor problem: An experimental study. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 59(9):1281–1287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Katok E (2008) Learning by doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(3):519–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Braunscheidel MJ, Suresh NC (2009) The organizational antecedents of a firm's supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. J. Oper. Management 27(2):119–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter JR, Maltz A, Yan T, Maltz E (2008) How procurement managers view low cost countries and georgraphis: A perceptual mapping approach. Internat. J. Physical Distribution Logist. Management 38(3):224–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casella G, Berger RL (2001) Statistical Inference, 2nd ed. (Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA).Google Scholar
• Croson R, Donohue K (2006) Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Management Sci. 52(3):323–336.Link, Google Scholar
• Dada M, Petruzzi NC, Schwarz LB (2007) A newsvendor's procurement problem when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(1):9–32.Link, Google Scholar
• Ellis SC, Henry RM, Shockley J (2010) Buyer perceptions of supply disruption risk: A behavioral view and empirical assessment. J. Oper. Management 28(1):34–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fink R (2011) Supply chain woes widen. Wall Street Journal (April 20), https://blogs.wsj.com/cfo/2011/04/20/supply-chain-woes-widen/.Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Ratner RK, Lieb DS (2005) How subjective grouping of options influences choice and allocation: Diversification bias and the phenomenon of partition dependence. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 134(4):538–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavirneni S, Xia Y (2009) Anchor selection and group dynamics in newsvendor decisions—A note. Decision Anal. 6(2):87–97.Link, Google Scholar
• Gumus M, Ray S, Gurnani H (2012) Supply-side story: Risks, guarantees, competition, and information asymmetry. Management Sci. 58(9):1694–1714.Link, Google Scholar
• Gurnani H, Shi M (2006) A bargaining model for a first-time interaction under asymmetric beliefs of supply reliability. Management Sci. 52(6):865–880.Link, Google Scholar
• Gurnani H, Akella R, Lehoczky J (2000) Supply management in assembly systems with random yield and demand. IIE Trans. 32:701–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison GW, Moritz S, Pibernik R (2009) How does the risk attitude of a purchasing manager affect the selection of suppliers? Working paper, European Business School Research Paper 09-10, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1396169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendricks KB, Singhal VR (2005) Association between supply chain glitches and operating performance. Management Sci. 51:695–711.Link, Google Scholar
• Ho TH, Zhang J (2008) Designing pricing contracts for boundedly rational customers: Does the framing of the fixed fee matter? Management Sci. 54(4):686–700.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang B, Baker RC, Frazierb GV (2009) An analysis of job dissatisfaction and turnover to reduce global supply chain risk: Evidence from china. J. Oper. Management 27(2):169–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalkanci B, Chen K-Y, Erhun F (2011) Contract complexity and performance under asymmetric demand information: An experimental evaluation. Management Sci. 57(4):689–704.Link, Google Scholar
• Katok E, Wu D (2009) Contracting in supply chains: A laboratory investigation. Management Sci. 55(12):1953–1968.Link, Google Scholar
• Kraljic P (1983) Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Bus. Rev. (September), 109–117.Google Scholar
• Loch CH, Wu Y (2008) Social preferences and supply chain performance: An experimental study. Management Sci. 54(11): 1835–1849.Link, Google Scholar
• Lurie N, Swaminathan JM (2009) Is timely information always better?: The effect of feedback frequency on performance and knowledge acquisition. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 108(2):315–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller JW (2010) Flight ban takes toll on some sectors. Wall Street Journal (April 21), http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704448304575196270378295464.html.Google Scholar
• Prasnikar V, Roth AE (1992) Considerations of fairness and strategy: Experimental data from sequential games. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):865–888.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puljic M (2010) The influence of cognitive biases on managerial perceptions of supply chain risk. Dani S, ed. Proc. 10th Internat. Res. Seminar on Supply Chain Risk Management (Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK).Google Scholar
• Read D, Loewenstein G (1995) Diversification bias: Explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking between combined and separated choices. J. Experiment. Psych.: Appl. 1(1):34–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Erev I (1995) Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games Econom. Behav. 8(1):164–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweitzer ME, Cachon GP (2000) Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. 46(3):404–420.Link, Google Scholar
• Shanks DR, Tunney RJ, McCarthy JD (2002) A re-examination of probability matching and rational choice. J. Behav. Decision Making 15(3):233–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegel S (1964) Choice, Strategy, and Utility (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Simonson I (1990) The effect of purchase quantity and timing on variety-seeking behavior. J. Marketing Res. 27(2):150–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith ME (2009) Psychological foundations of supply chain risk management. Zsidisin GA, Ritchie B, eds. Supply Chain Risk, International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 124 (Springer, New York), 219–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sodhi MS, Son B-G, Tang CS (2012) Researchers' perspectives on supply chain risk management. Production Oper. Management 21(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stone ER, Yates JF, Parker AM (1994) Risk communication: Absolute versus relative expressions of low-probability risks. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 60(3):387–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su X (2008) Bounded rationality in newsvendor models. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):566–589.Link, Google Scholar
• Tang CS (2006) Perspectives in supply chain risk management: A review. Internat. J. Production Econom. 103(2):451–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH (1999) Mental accounting matters. J. Behav. Decision Making 12(3):183–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tomlin B (2009) Disruption-management strategies for short life-cycle products. Naval Res. Logist. 56(4):318–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tomlin B, Wang Y (2005) On the value of mix flexibility and dual sourcing in unreliable newsvendor networks. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 7(1):37–57.Link, Google Scholar
• Wagner SM, Bode C (2008) An empirical examination of supply chain performance along several dimensions of risk. J. Bus. Logist. 29(1):307–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Aydin G, Babich V, Beil DR (2009) Supply disruptions, asymmetric information, and a backup production option. Management Sci. 55(2):192–209.Link, Google Scholar
• Yu H, Zeng AZ, Zhao L (2009) Single or dual sourcing: Decision-making in the presence of supply chain disruption risks. Omega 37(4):788–800.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zsidisin GA (2003) A grounded definition of supply risk. J. Purchasing Supply Management 9(5):217–224.Crossref, Google Scholar