Transparency of Information Acquisition in a Supply Chain

References

• Anand KS, Goyal M (2009) Strategic information management under leakage in a supply chain. Management Sci. 55(3):438–452.Link, Google Scholar
• Block H, Li Y, Savits T (2005) Mixtures of normal distributions: Modality and failure rate. Statist. Probab. Lett. 74(3):253–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon G (2003) Supply chain coordination with contracts. de Kok AG, Graves SC, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 11 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 229–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corbett CJ, Zhou D, Tang CS (2004) Designing supply contracts: Contract type and information asymmetry. Management Sci. 50(4):550–559.Link, Google Scholar
• Fu Q, Zhu K (2010) Endogenous information acquisition in supply chain management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 201(2):454–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon A (2010) The mythe of market research's failure. Research (blog). Last accessed April 16, 2014, http://www.research-live.com/the-myth-of-market-researchs-failure/4004262.blog.Google Scholar
• Guo L (2009) The benefits of downstream information acquisition. Marketing Sci. 28(3):457–471.Link, Google Scholar
• Ha A (2001) Supplier-buyer contracting: Asymmetric cost information and the cut-off level policy for buyer participation. Naval Res. Logist. 48(1):41–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ha A, Tong S (2008) Contracting and information sharing under supply chain competition. Management Sci. 54(4):701–715.Link, Google Scholar
• Jansen J (2008) Information acquisition and strategic disclosure in oligopoly. J. Econom. Management Strategy 17(1):113–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kong G, Rajagopalan S, Zhang H (2013) Revenue sharing and information leakage in a supply chain. Management Sci. 59(3):556–572.Link, Google Scholar
• Lariviere A (2002) Inducing forecast revelation through restricted returns. Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
• Li Z, Gilbert S, Lai G (2013) Supplier encroachment under asymmetric information. Management Sci. 60(2):449–462.Google Scholar
• Mas-Colell A, Whinston M, Green J (1995) Microconomic Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY).Google Scholar
• Matthews S, Postlewaite A (1985) Quality testing and disclosure. RAND J. Econom. 16(3):328–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Segal I (2002) Envelope theorems for arbitrary choice sets. Econometrica 70(2):583–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miyaoka J, Hausman WH (2008) How improved forecasts can degrade decentralized supply chains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(3):547–562.Link, Google Scholar
• Myerson RB (1979) Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica 47(1):61–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh S, Özer Ö (2013) Mechanism design for capacity planning under dynamic evolutions of asymmetric demand forecasts. Management Sci. 59(4):987–1007.Link, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Wei W (2006) Strategic commitments for optimal capacity decision under asymmetric forecast information. Management Sci. 52(8):1238–1257.Link, Google Scholar
• Shavell S (1994) Acquisition and disclosure of information prior to sale. RAND J. Econom. 25(1):20–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin H, Tunca TI (2010) Do firms invest in forecasting efficiently? The effect of competition on demand forecast investments and supply chain coordination. Oper. Res. 58(6):1592–1610.Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor TA, Xiao W (2009) Incentives for retailer forecasting: Rebates vs. returns. Management Sci. 55(10):1654–1669.Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor TA, Xiao W (2010) Does a manufacturer benefit from selling to a better-forecasting retailer? Management Sci. 56(9):1584–1598.Link, Google Scholar
• Tirole J (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Zaltman G, Zaltman L, Sturgess D, Lee A, Fujikawa Y, Carbone L (2008) The sure thing that flopped. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(7/8):29–37.Google Scholar